David W. Jang

Dr. David W. Jang

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

13Years (2014-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
15 February 2022 in Journal of Clinical Investigation
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
AOAllison Oliva
Allison Oliva
RGRupali Gupta
Rupali Gupta
KIKhalil Issa
Khalil Issa
RHRalph Abi Hachem
Ralph Abi Hachem
DJDavid W. Jang
David W. Jang
BGBradley J. Goldstein
Bradley J. Goldstein
BACKGROUND. Presbyosmia, or aging-related olfactory loss, occurs in a majority of humans over age 65 years, yet remains poorly understood, with no specific treatment options. The olfactory epithelium (OE) is the peripheral organ for olfaction and is subject to acquired damage, suggesting a likely site of pathology in aging. Adult stem cells reconstitute the neuroepithelium in response to cell loss under normal conditions. In aged OE, patches of respiratory-like metaplasia have been observed histologically, consistent with a failure in normal neuroepithelial homeostasis. Methods. Accordingly, we have focused on identifying cellular and molecular changes in presbyosmic OE. The study combined psychophysical testing with olfactory mucosa biopsy analysis, single-cell RNA-Sequencing (scRNA-Seq), and culture studies. Results. We identified evidence for inflammation-associated changes in the OE stem cells of presbyosmic patients. The presbyosmic basal stem cells exhibited increased expression of genes involved in response to cytokines or stress or the regulation of proliferation and differentiation. Using a culture model, we found that cytokine exposure drove increased TP63, a transcription factor acting to prevent OE stem cell differentiation. Conclusions. Our data suggest aging-related inflammatory changes in OE stem cells may contribute to presbyosmia via the disruption of normal epithelial homeostasis. OE stem cells may represent a therapeutic target for restoration of olfaction. Funding. NIH grants DC018371, NS121067, DC016224; Office of Physician-Scientist Development, Burroughs-Wellcome Fund Research Fellowship for Medical Students Award, Duke University School of Medicine.

25 September 2014 in Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
DJDavid W. Jang
David W. Jang
VLVasileios A. Lachanas
Vasileios A. Lachanas
LWLauren C. White
Lauren C. White
SKStilianos E. Kountakis
Stilianos E. Kountakis

14 December 2017 in International Forum of Allergy & Rhinology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
KCKevin J. Choi
Kevin J. Choi
TCTracy Z. Cheng
Tracy Z. Cheng
AHAdam L. Honeybrook
Adam L. Honeybrook
AGAlice L. Gray
Alice L. Gray
LSLaurie D. Snyder
Laurie D. Snyder
DJDavid W. Jang
David W. Jang

14 September 2018 in International Forum of Allergy & Rhinology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
RVRicardo Villarreal
Ricardo Villarreal
BWBozena B. Wrobel
Bozena B. Wrobel
LMLuis F. Macias‐Valle
Luis F. Macias‐Valle
GDGreg E. Davis
Greg E. Davis
TPThomas J. Prihoda
Thomas J. Prihoda
PCPhilip G. Chen
Philip G. Chen
Background: Inconsistencies in the nomenclature of structures of the frontal sinus have impeded the development of a validated “reference standard” classification system that surgeons can reliably agree upon. The International Frontal Sinus Anatomy Classification (IFAC) system was developed as a consensus document, based on expert opinion, attempting to address this issue. The purposes of this study are to: establish the reliability of the IFAC as a tool for classifying cells in the frontal recess among an international group of rhinologists; and improve communication and teaching of frontal endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS).Methods: Forty‐two computed tomography (CT) scans, each with a marked frontal cell, were reviewed by 15 international fellowship‐trained rhinologists. Each marked cell was classified into 1 of 7 categories described in the IFAC, on 2 occasions separated by 2 weeks. Inter‐ and intrarater reliability were evaluated using Light's kappa (κ), the interclass correlation coefficient (ICC), and simple proportion of agreement.Results: Interrater reliability showed pairwise κ values ranging from 0.7248 to 1.0, with a mean of 0.9162 (SD, 0.0537). The ICC was 0.98. Intrarater reliability showed κ values ranging from 0.8613 to 1.0, with a mean of 0.9407 (SD, 0.0376). The within‐rater ICC was 0.98.Conclusion: Among a diverse sample of rhinologists (raters), there was substantial to almost perfect agreement between raters, and among individual raters at different timepoints. The IFAC is a reliable tool for classification of cells in the frontal sinus. Further outcome studies are still needed to determine the validity of the IFAC.

12 March 2019 in The Laryngoscope
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MRMilap D. Raikundalia
Milap D. Raikundalia
TCTracy Z. Cheng
Tracy Z. Cheng
TTTracy Truong
Tracy Truong
MKMaragatha Kuchibhatla
Maragatha Kuchibhatla
JRJiyoung Ryu
Jiyoung Ryu
DJDavid W. Jang
David W. Jang

22 September 2020 in The Laryngoscope
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
FAFeras Y. Ackall
Feras Y. Ackall
KIKhalil Issa
Khalil Issa
IBIan Barak
Ian Barak
JTJordan Teitelbaum
Jordan Teitelbaum
DJDavid W. Jang
David W. Jang
RHRalph Abi Hachem
Ralph Abi Hachem