David Garway-Heath

Prof. David Garway-Heath

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

34Years (1993-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 October 2000 in Ophthalmology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
DGDavid Garway-Heath
David Garway-Heath
DPDarmalingum Poinoosawmy
Darmalingum Poinoosawmy
FFFrederick W Fitzke
Frederick W Fitzke
RHRoger A Hitchings
Roger A Hitchings

1 April 2015 in The Lancet
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
DGDavid Garway-Heath
David Garway-Heath
DCDavid P Crabb
David P Crabb
CBCatey Bunce
Catey Bunce
GLGerassimos Lascaratos
Gerassimos Lascaratos
FAFrancesca Amalfitano
Francesca Amalfitano
TZThierry G Zeyen
Thierry G Zeyen
Treatments for open-angle glaucoma aim to prevent vision loss through lowering of intraocular pressure, but to our knowledge no placebo-controlled trials have assessed visual function preservation, and the observation periods of previous (unmasked) trials have typically been at least 5 years. We assessed vision preservation in patients given latanoprost compared with those given placebo. In this randomised, triple-masked, placebo-controlled trial, we enrolled patients with newly diagnosed open-angle glaucoma at ten UK centres (tertiary referral centres, teaching hospitals, and district general hospitals). Eligible patients were randomly allocated (1:1) with a website-generated randomisation schedule, stratified by centre and with a permuted block design, to receive either latanoprost 0·005% (intervention group) or placebo (control group) eye drops. Drops were administered from identical bottles, once a day, to both eyes. The primary outcome was time to visual field deterioration within 24 months. Analyses were done in all individuals with follow-up data. The Data and Safety Monitoring Committee (DSMC) recommended stopping the trial on Jan 6, 2011 (last patient visit July, 2011), after an interim analysis, and suggested a change in primary outcome from the difference in proportions of patients with incident progression between groups to time to visual field deterioration within 24 months. This trial is registered, number ISRCTN96423140. We enrolled 516 individuals between Dec 1, 2006, and March 16, 2010. Baseline mean intraocular pressure was 19·6 mm Hg (SD 4·6) in 258 patients in the latanoprost group and 20·1 mm Hg (4·8) in 258 controls. At 24 months, mean reduction in intraocular pressure was 3·8 mm Hg (4·0) in 231 patients assessed in the latanoprost group and 0·9 mm Hg (3·8) in 230 patients assessed in the placebo group. Visual field preservation was significantly longer in the latanoprost group than in the placebo group: adjusted hazard ratio (HR) 0·44 (95% CI 0·28-0·69; p=0·0003). We noted 18 serious adverse events, none attributable to the study drug. This is the first randomised placebo-controlled trial to show preservation of the visual field with an intraocular-pressure-lowering drug in patients with open-angle glaucoma. The study design enabled significant differences in vision to be assessed in a relatively short observation period. Pfizer, UK National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre.

22 January 2008 in British Journal of Ophthalmology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
BCB C Chauhan
B C Chauhan
DGDavid Garway-Heath
David Garway-Heath
FGF J Goni
F J Goni
LRLuca Rossetti
Luca Rossetti
BBB Bengtsson
B Bengtsson
AHA Heijl
A Heijl
To date, there has been a lack of evidence-based guidance on the frequency of visual field examinations required to identify clinically meaningful rates of change in glaucoma. The objective of this perspective is to provide practical recommendations for this purpose. The primary emphasis is on the period of time and number of examinations required to measure various rates of change in mean deviation (MD) with adequate statistical power. Empirical data were used to obtain variability estimates of MD while statistical modelling techniques derived the required time periods to detect change with various degrees of visual field variability. We provide the frequency of examinations per year required to detect different amounts of change in 2, 3 and 5 years. For instance, three examinations per year are required to identify an overall change in MD of 4 dB over 2 years in a patient with average visual field variability. Recommendations on other issues such as examination type, strategy and quality are also made.

29 August 2005 in Annals of Neurology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
STS. Anand Trip
S. Anand Trip
PSPatricio G. Schlottmann
Patricio G. Schlottmann
SJStephen J. Jones
Stephen J. Jones
DADaniel R. Altmann
Daniel R. Altmann
DGDavid Garway-Heath
David Garway-Heath
DMDavid H. Miller
David H. Miller

1 December 2006 in Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
AKAachal Kotecha
Aachal Kotecha
Ahmed ElsheikhAhmed Elsheikh
Ahmed Elsheikh
CRCynthia R. Roberts
Cynthia R. Roberts
HZHaogang Zhu
Haogang Zhu
DGDavid Garway-Heath
David Garway-Heath
Purpose. The Ocular Response Analyzer (ORA) is a new instrument that measures the corneal biomechanical response (corneal hysteresis, CH) to rapid indentation by an air jet. CH is the difference in applanation pressures (P1, P2) between the rising and falling phases of the air jet. The investigation had two parts: a characterization study and a validation study. In the characterization study, the purposes were to investigate the intraocular pressure (IOP)–dependence of CH and to characterize the performance of the ORA. In the validation study, the purposes were to investigate the association between CH and both age and central corneal thickness (CCT) and the agreement between ORA and Goldmann applanation tonometer (GAT) IOP measurements.