Kyle R. Upton

Dr. Kyle R. Upton


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

17Years (2010-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
30 October 2011 in Nature
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JBJ. Kenneth Baillie
J. Kenneth Baillie
MBMark W. Barnett
Mark W. Barnett
KUKyle R. Upton
Kyle R. Upton
DGDaniel J. Gerhardt
Daniel J. Gerhardt
TRTodd A. Richmond
Todd A. Richmond
GFGeoffrey Faulkner
Geoffrey Faulkner
Mobilization of retrotransposons, genetic elements able to move around in the genome where they can become incorporated and start to amplify themselves, is normally suppressed in somatic cells. However, recent reports indicate that L1 retrotransposons can be mobilized in the human brain; this has important consequences for intercellular variation. Using a high-throughput approach, Baillie et al. identify numerous germ-line mutations and putative somatic insertions in the human hippocampus and caudate nucleus, including those of Alu elements. The implication is that retrotransposition-driven somatic mosaicism may reshape the genetic circuitry that underpins normal and abnormal neurobiological processes. Retrotransposons are mobile genetic elements that use a germline ‘copy-and-paste’ mechanism to spread throughout metazoan genomes1. At least 50 per cent of the human genome is derived from retrotransposons, with three active families (L1, Alu and SVA) associated with insertional mutagenesis and disease2,3. Epigenetic and post-transcriptional suppression block retrotransposition in somatic cells4,5, excluding early embryo development and some malignancies6,7. Recent reports of L1 expression8,9 and copy number variation10,11 in the human brain suggest that L1 mobilization may also occur during later development. However, the corresponding integration sites have not been mapped. Here we apply a high-throughput method to identify numerous L1, Alu and SVA germline mutations, as well as 7,743 putative somatic L1 insertions, in the hippocampus and caudate nucleus of three individuals. Surprisingly, we also found 13,692 somatic Alu insertions and 1,350 SVA insertions. Our results demonstrate that retrotransposons mobilize to protein-coding genes differentially expressed and active in the brain. Thus, somatic genome mosaicism driven by retrotransposition may reshape the genetic circuitry that underpins normal and abnormal neurobiological processes.

1 March 2013 in Cell
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
RSRuchi Shukla
Ruchi Shukla
KUKyle R. Upton
Kyle R. Upton
MMMartin Muñoz-Lopez
Martin Muñoz-Lopez
DGDaniel J. Gerhardt
Daniel J. Gerhardt
MFMalcolm E. Fisher
Malcolm E. Fisher
GFGeoffrey Faulkner
Geoffrey Faulkner
LINE-1 (L1) retrotransposons are mobile genetic elements comprising ~17% of the human genome. New L1 insertions can profoundly alter gene function and cause disease, though their significance in cancer remains unclear. Here, we applied enhanced retrotransposon capture sequencing (RC-seq) to 19 hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) genomes and elucidated two archetypal L1-mediated mechanisms enabling tumorigenesis. In the first example, 4/19 (21.1%) donors presented germline retrotransposition events in the tumor suppressor mutated in colorectal cancers (MCC). MCC expression was ablated in each case, enabling oncogenic β-catenin/Wnt signaling. In the second example, suppression of tumorigenicity 18 (ST18) was activated by a tumor-specific L1 insertion. Experimental assays confirmed that the L1 interrupted a negative feedback loop by blocking ST18 repression of its enhancer. ST18 was also frequently amplified in HCC nodules from Mdr2(-/-) mice, supporting its assignment as a candidate liver oncogene. These proof-of-principle results substantiate L1-mediated retrotransposition as an important etiological factor in HCC.

1 April 2015 in Cell
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
KUKyle R. Upton
Kyle R. Upton
DGDaniel J. Gerhardt
Daniel J. Gerhardt
JJJ. Samuel Jesuadian
J. Samuel Jesuadian
SRSandra R. Richardson
Sandra R. Richardson
FSFrancisco J. Sánchez-Luque
Francisco J. Sánchez-Luque
GFGeoffrey Faulkner
Geoffrey Faulkner
Somatic LINE-1 (L1) retrotransposition during neurogenesis is a potential source of genotypic variation among neurons. As a neurogenic niche, the hippocampus supports pronounced L1 activity. However, the basal parameters and biological impact of L1-driven mosaicism remain unclear. Here, we performed single-cell retrotransposon capture sequencing (RC-seq) on individual human hippocampal neurons and glia, as well as cortical neurons. An estimated 13.7 somatic L1 insertions occurred per hippocampal neuron and carried the sequence hallmarks of target-primed reverse transcription. Notably, hippocampal neuron L1 insertions were specifically enriched in transcribed neuronal stem cell enhancers and hippocampus genes, increasing their probability of functional relevance. In addition, bias against intronic L1 insertions sense oriented relative to their host gene was observed, perhaps indicating moderate selection against this configuration in vivo. These experiments demonstrate pervasive L1 mosaicism at genomic loci expressed in hippocampal neurons.

11 September 2012 in Genome Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SSSzilvia Solyom
Szilvia Solyom
AEAdam Ewing
Adam Ewing
EREric P. Rahrmann
Eric P. Rahrmann
TDTara Doucet
Tara Doucet
HNHeather H. Nelson
Heather H. Nelson
HKHaig H. Kazazian
Haig H. Kazazian
L1 retrotransposons comprise 17% of the human genome and are its only autonomous mobile elements. Although L1-induced insertional mutagenesis causes Mendelian disease, their mutagenic load in cancer has been elusive. Using L1-targeted resequencing of 16 colorectal tumor and matched normal DNAs, we found that certain cancers were excessively mutagenized by human-specific L1s, while no verifiable insertions were present in normal tissues. We confirmed de novo L1 insertions in malignancy by both validating and sequencing 69/107 tumor-specific insertions and retrieving both 5′ and 3′ junctions for 35. In contrast to germline polymorphic L1s, all insertions were severely 5′ truncated. Validated insertion numbers varied from up to 17 in some tumors to none in three others, and correlated with the age of the patients. Numerous genes with a role in tumorigenesis were targeted, including ODZ3, ROBO2, PTPRM, PCM1, and CDH11. Thus, somatic retrotransposition may play an etiologic role in colorectal cancer.

1 November 2018 in The Journal of Immunology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CPClare Pridans
Clare Pridans
ARAnna Raper
Anna Raper
GDGemma M. Davis
Gemma M. Davis
JAJoana Alves
Joana Alves
KSKristin A Sauter
Kristin A Sauter
DHDavid A Hume
David A Hume
We have produced Csf1r-deficient rats by homologous recombination in embryonic stem cells. Consistent with the role of Csf1r in macrophage differentiation, there was a loss of peripheral blood monocytes, microglia in the brain, epidermal Langerhans cells, splenic marginal zone macrophages, bone-associated macrophages and osteoclasts, and peritoneal macrophages. Macrophages of splenic red pulp, liver, lung, and gut were less affected. The pleiotropic impacts of the loss of macrophages on development of multiple organ systems in rats were distinct from those reported in mice. Csf1r−/− rats survived well into adulthood with postnatal growth retardation, distinct skeletal and bone marrow abnormalities, infertility, and loss of visceral adipose tissue. Gene expression analysis in spleen revealed selective loss of transcripts associated with the marginal zone and, in brain regions, the loss of known and candidate novel microglia-associated transcripts. Despite the complete absence of microglia, there was little overt phenotype in brain, aside from reduced myelination and increased expression of dopamine receptor-associated transcripts in striatum. The results highlight the redundant and nonredundant functions of CSF1R signaling and of macrophages in development, organogenesis, and homeostasis.

8 January 2016 in Nature Communications
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
SKSabine Klawitter
Sabine Klawitter
NFNina V Fuchs
Nina V Fuchs
KUKyle R. Upton
Kyle R. Upton
MMMartin Muñoz-Lopez
Martin Muñoz-Lopez
RSRuchi Shukla
Ruchi Shukla
GSGerald G. Schumann
Gerald G. Schumann
Human induced pluripotent stem cells (hiPSCs) are capable of unlimited proliferation and can differentiate in vitro to generate derivatives of the three primary germ layers. Genetic and epigenetic abnormalities have been reported by Wissing and colleagues to occur during hiPSC derivation, including mobilization of engineered LINE-1 (L1) retrotransposons. However, incidence and functional impact of endogenous retrotransposition in hiPSCs are yet to be established. Here we apply retrotransposon capture sequencing to eight hiPSC lines and three human embryonic stem cell (hESC) lines, revealing endogenous L1, Alu and SINE-VNTR-Alu (SVA) mobilization during reprogramming and pluripotent stem cell cultivation. Surprisingly, 4/7 de novo L1 insertions are full length and 6/11 retrotransposition events occurred in protein-coding genes expressed in pluripotent stem cells. We further demonstrate that an intronic L1 insertion in the CADPS2 gene is acquired during hiPSC cultivation and disrupts CADPS2 expression. These experiments elucidate endogenous retrotransposition, and its potential consequences, in hiPSCs and hESCs.