Ahed Al-Wahadni

Dr. Ahed Al-Wahadni


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

25Years (2002-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 February 2006 in Journal of Dental Education
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MAMahmoud K. Al‐Omiri
Mahmoud K. Al‐Omiri
AAAhed Al-Wahadni
Ahed Al-Wahadni
KSKhaled N. Saeed
Khaled N. Saeed

1 January 2004 in Journal of Oral Science
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
AAAhed Al-Wahadni
Ahed Al-Wahadni
MAMahmoud Khaled AL-Omiri
Mahmoud Khaled AL-Omiri
MKMakoto Kawamura
Makoto Kawamura
The aim of this study was to compare differences in oral health behavior between dental students and dental technology/dental hygiene students in Jordan. One hundred and five dental students and seventy-eight dental technology/dental hygiene students were recruited into this study. All subjects were recruited from the students who were receiving training at the clinics and laboratories that belong to the Faculty of Dentistry, Jordan University of Science and Technology. The Hiroshima University-Dental Behavioral Inventory (HU-DBI) was used to assess the oral heath behavior of the subjects. Significant differences were found between students from different disciplines. Dental students were found to worry more about visiting their dentist, to be less aware of bleeding gums when brushing and were less bothered by the color of their gums compared with dental technology and dental hygiene (DT/DH) students (P < 0.05, P < 0.001 and P < 0.05, respectively). Dental students tended to be more professionally educated about brushing and to have a belief that they cannot clean their teeth well without using toothpaste (P < 0.01 and P < 0.001, respectively). Most of them did not feel they have brushed well unless they brush with strong strokes (P < 0.05). A logistic regression model showed that it might be possible to distinguish dental students from DT/DH students by using three items of the HU-DBI and the level of dental education. The difference in the HU-DBI scores was not a major feature. There were significant differences in oral health attitudes/behavior between dental students and DT/DH students. The findings might reflect differences in students' training experience and education between different specialties. (J. Oral Sci. 46, 191-197, 2004)

1 November 2002 in International Endodontic Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
AAAhed Al-Wahadni
Ahed Al-Wahadni
DGD. L. Gutteridge
D. L. Gutteridge

1 August 2008 in Oral Surgery Oral Medicine Oral Pathology Oral Radiology and Endodontology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
AAAhed Al-Wahadni
Ahed Al-Wahadni
SHSami Hamdan
Sami Hamdan
MAMahmoud Khaled AL-Omiri
Mahmoud Khaled AL-Omiri
MHMohammad M. Hammad
Mohammad M. Hammad
MHMuhanad M. Hatamleh
Muhanad M. Hatamleh

1 May 2005 in The Cleft Palate Craniofacial Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
AAAhed Al-Wahadni
Ahed Al-Wahadni
EAElham Abu Alhaija
Elham Abu Alhaija
MAMohammed Amin Al-Omari
Mohammed Amin Al-Omari
Objective: To determine the levels of periodontal disease and dental caries in subjects with cleft lip and palate and to compare them with matched noncleft control subjects. Design: A total of 32 subjects with cleft lip and palate, ages 10 to 28 years, and a similar number of noncleft control subjects were examined for plaque biofilm deposits, gingivitis, periodontitis, and dental caries by using the Silness and Löe plaque index (PI), Löe and Silness gingival index (GI), probing pocket depth (PPD), and the decayed-missing-filled-teeth (DMFT) index, respectively. Setting: Faculty of Dentistry, Jordan University of Science and Technology, and Prince Rashed Hospital, Royal Medical Services, northern Jordan. Results: Scores for PI, GI, PPD, and DMFT were significantly higher in subjects with cleft lip and palate than in control subjects. Conclusion: Subjects with cleft lip and palate are at an increased risk for dental caries and periodontal disease when compared with a noncleft population.

14 December 2021 in Education Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
RFRami Al Fodeh
Rami Al Fodeh
AAAhed Al-Wahadni
Ahed Al-Wahadni
EAElham S. Abu Alhaija
Elham S. Abu Alhaija
TBThikrayat Bani-Hani
Thikrayat Bani-Hani
KAKAMRAN ALI
KAMRAN ALI
HDHasan O. Daher
Hasan O. Daher
Blended learning is growing in popularity particularly following the emergence of COVID-19 pandemic. One of the fields that the pandemic has substantially affected is dental education. Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate the quality and effectiveness of the online dental education. Students’ perceptions and experiences of blended learning were also investigated. Methods: A 28-question online survey was designed to gauge students’ perceptions of the effect of blended learning on their academic performance. Results: 314 participants in preclinical and clinical years completed the questionnaire (223 females and 91 males). The majority of students (89%) believed that clinical and practical courses cannot be given by the internet. In terms of students’ opinion in the assessment process, more females (65.8%) preferred traditional exams than males (50.5%) (p < 0.05). Most clinical students (83%) preferred a combination of online and traditional teaching compared to 72% of preclinical students (p < 0.05). Clinical year students were more willing to communicate electronically with their classmates and instructors. The majority of dental students (65%) reported that future dental courses should be blended. Conclusions: In the pandemic era, blended learning, should become the preferred method of education whereby theoretical knowledge is delivered through online tutorials and clinical training is resumed on-site, to ensure competency of dental graduates while maintaining safety of the dental team. Current facilities and course designs should be improved in order to improve students’ experiences with blended learning.