PURPOSE: The phase III SKYSCRAPER-02 study determined whether the benefits of atezolizumab plus carboplatin and etoposide (CE) could be enhanced by the addition of tiragolumab in untreated extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC). We report final progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) analyses. METHODS: Patients received tiragolumab 600 mg/placebo, plus atezolizumab 1,200 mg and CE (four cycles), then maintenance tiragolumab/placebo plus atezolizumab. Primary end points were investigator-assessed PFS and OS in patients without history/presence of brain metastases (primary analysis set [PAS]). Additional end points included PFS and OS in all patients regardless of brain metastases status (full analysis set [FAS]), response, and safety. RESULTS: Four hundred ninety patients were randomly assigned (FAS): 243 to tiragolumab arm and 247 to control arm. At the cutoff date (February 6, 2022; median duration of follow-up, 14.3 months [PAS] and 13.9 months [FAS]), final analysis of PFS in the PAS (n = 397) did not reach statistical significance (stratified hazard ratio [HR], 1.11; P = .3504; median, 5.4 months tiragolumab v 5.6 months control). At the cutoff date (September 6, 2022; median duration of follow-up, 21.2 months [FAS]), median OS in the PAS at final OS analysis was 13.1 months in both arms (stratified HR, 1.14; P = .2859). Median PFS and OS in the FAS were consistent with the PAS. The proportion of patients with immune-mediated adverse events (AEs) in the tiragolumab and control arms was 54.4% and 49.2%, respectively (grade 3/4: 7.9% and 7.7%). AEs leading to treatment withdrawal occurred in 8.4% and 9.3% of tiragolumab- and control-treated patients, respectively. CONCLUSION: Tiragolumab did not provide additional benefit over atezolizumab and CE in untreated ES-SCLC. The combination was well tolerated with no new safety signals.

Background: High-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) oxygen therapy may provide effective respiratory management of hypoxemic respiratory failure in patients with interstitial lung disease (ILD) with a do-not-intubate (DNI) order. Objectives: The aim was to assess the efficacy and tolerability of HFNC for these patients. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the records of patients requesting a DNI order for hypoxemic respiratory failure associated with ILD, comparing treatment with HFNC and noninvasive positive pressure ventilation (NPPV). Outcomes measured were 30-day survival, in-hospital mortality, temporary interruption and discontinuation of the treatment at the patient’s request, adverse events, oral intake, and communication ability at the end of life. Results: A total of 84 patients (HFNC, n = 54; NPPV, n = 30) were analyzed. Neither 30-day survival (HFNC 31.5% vs. NPPV 30.0%; p = 0.86) nor in-hospital mortality (HFNC 79.6% vs. NPPV 83.3%; p = 0.78) differed significantly. The temporary interruption and discontinuation rates were significantly lower in the HFNC group than in the NPPV group (3.7 vs. 23.3%; p = 0.009 and 0 vs. 10%; p = 0.043, respectively), and that group had significantly fewer adverse events. Among patients who died in the hospital, those treated with HFNC had significantly better oral intake and ability to converse until just before death. Conclusion: HFNC had a survival rate equivalent to that of NPPV and was better tolerated by patients with hypoxemic respiratory failure associated with ILD who had a DNI order. HFNC allowed patients to eat and converse until just before death, suggesting that HFNC in these patients is a reasonable palliative treatment.

Purpose: Although the efficacy of programmed cell death–1 (PD-1) blockade is generally poor for non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with activating mutations of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene, EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) may improve the tumor immune microenvironment. We performed a randomized study to assess whether nivolumab improves outcome compared with chemotherapy in such patients previously treated with EGFR-TKIs. Patients and Methods: Patients with EGFR-mutated NSCLC who acquired EGFR-TKI resistance not due to a secondary T790M mutation of EGFR were randomized 1:1 to nivolumab (n = 52) or carboplatin–pemetrexed (n = 50). The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Results: Median PFS and 1-year PFS probability were 1.7 months and 9.6% for nivolumab versus 5.6 months and 14.0% for carboplatin–pemetrexed [log-rank P < 001; hazard ratio (HR) of 1.92, with a 60% confidence interval (CI) of 1.61–2.29]. Overall survival was 20.7 and 19.9 months [HR, 0.88 (95% CI, 0.53–1.47)], and response rate was 9.6% and 36.0% for nivolumab and carboplatin–pemetrexed, respectively. No subgroup including patients with a high tumor mutation burden showed a substantially longer PFS with nivolumab than with carboplatin-pemetrexed. The T-cell–inflamed gene expression profile score (0.11 vs. −0.17, P = 0.036) and expression of genes related to cytotoxic T lymphocytes or their recruitment were higher in tumors that showed a benefit from nivolumab. Conclusions: Nivolumab did not confer a longer PFS compared with carboplatin-pemetrexed in the study patients. Gene expression profiling identified some cases with a favorable tumor immune microenvironment that was associated with nivolumab efficacy.

Background. Although predictive value of immune‐related adverse events (irAEs) induced by immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have been suggested by several studies, their assessments were insufficient because patients were categorized only by the occurrence of irAEs. It has not been elucidated whether irAEs also play a significant role even in responders. Materials and Methods. Between December 2015 and September 2018, 106 patients with advanced non‐small cell lung cancer treated with ICIs were enrolled in our prospective biomarker study. Twenty‐three of these were responders, defined as those with complete or partial response. We investigated the proportion of irAEs among overall and responders. For responders, progression‐free survival (PFS) and overall survival of ICIs were compared between those with and without irAEs. As an exploratory analysis, we measured 41 proteins from peripheral blood before and after ICI treatment. Results. The proportion of irAEs was significantly higher in responders than nonresponders (65.2% vs. 19.3%, p < .01). Among responders, clinical characteristics did not differ regardless of the occurrence of irAEs. However, there was a significant difference in PFS among responders (irAE group 19.1 months vs. non‐irAE group 5.6 months; hazard ratio: 0.30 [95% confidence interval: 0.10–0.85]; p = .02). Of 41 protein analyses, fibroblast growth factor‐2 at baseline and monocyte chemoattractant protein fold change showed significant differences between them (p < .04). Conclusion. Although this is a small sample–sized study, irAE might be a predictive factor of durable efficacy, even in patients who responded to ICIs. Investigation into the significance of irAEs in responders will contribute to the establishment of optimal administration of ICI. Implications for Practice. Although the predictive value of immune‐related adverse events (irAEs) induced by immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has been suggested by several studies, it has not been elucidated whether irAEs also play a significant role even in responders. This study showed that more than 60% of responders had irAEs. It demonstrated the strong correlation between irAEs and efficacy even in responders. Investigation into the significance of irAEs in responders will contribute to the establishment of optimal administration of ICI.