George Frederick Michel

Prof. Dr. George Frederick Michel

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

26Years (2001-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
16 March 2005 in Developmental Psychobiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
GMGeorge Frederick Michel
George Frederick Michel
ATAmber N. Tyler
Amber N. Tyler

2 February 2010 in Developmental Psychobiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MKMarliese Kimmerle
Marliese Kimmerle
CFClaudio L. Ferre
Claudio L. Ferre
KKKathleen A. Kotwica
Kathleen A. Kotwica
GMGeorge Frederick Michel
George Frederick Michel

2 August 2006 in Developmental Psychobiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
GMGeorge Frederick Michel
George Frederick Michel
ATAmber N. Tyler
Amber N. Tyler
CFClaudio Ferre
Claudio Ferre
CSChing‐Fan Sheu
Ching‐Fan Sheu

1 January 2013
Verified
Book Chapter
Closed access
GMGeorge Frederick Michel
George Frederick Michel
Eliza L. NelsonEliza L. Nelson
Eliza L. Nelson
IBIryna Babik
Iryna Babik
JCJulie M Campbell
Julie M Campbell
EMEmily C Marcinowski
Emily C Marcinowski

2 June 2021 in Symmetry
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
GMGeorge Frederick Michel
George Frederick Michel
The author presents his perspective on the character of science, development, and handedness and relates these to his investigations of the early development of handedness. After presenting some ideas on what hemispheric specialization of function might mean for neural processing and how handedness should be assessed, the neuroscience of control of the arms/hands and interhemispheric communication and coordination are examined for how developmental processes can affect these mechanisms. The author’s work on the development of early handedness is reviewed and placed within a context of cascading events in which different forms of handedness emerge from earlier forms but not in a deterministic manner. This approach supports a continuous rather than categorical distribution of handedness and accounts for the predominance of right-handedness while maintaining a minority of left-handedness. Finally, the relation of the development of handedness to the development of several language and cognitive skills is examined.

23 March 2016 in Frontiers in Psychology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
GMGeorge Frederick Michel
George Frederick Michel
JCJulie M. Campbell
Julie M. Campbell
EMEmily C. Marcinowski
Emily C. Marcinowski
Eliza L. NelsonEliza L. Nelson
Eliza L. Nelson
IBIryna Babik
Iryna Babik
Hand preference develops in the first two postnatal years with nearly half of infants exhibiting a consistent early preference for acquiring objects. Others exhibit a more variable developmental trajectory but by the end of their second postnatal year, most exhibit a consistent hand preference for role-differentiated bimanual manipulation. According to some forms of embodiment theory, these differences in hand use patterns should influence the way children interact with their environments, which, in turn, should affect the structure and function of brain development. Such early differences in brain development should result in different trajectories of psychological development. We present evidence that children with consistent early hand preferences exhibit advanced patterns of cognitive development as compared to children who develop a hand preference later. Differences in the developmental trajectory of hand preference are predictive of developmental differences in language, object management skills, and tool-use skills. As predicted by Cassasanto’s body-specificity hypothesis, infants with different hand preferences proceed along different developmental pathways of cognitive functioning.