Paulo A. Maia Neto

Prof. Paulo A. Maia Neto

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

36Years (1991-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 October 2006 in New Journal of Physics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ALAstrid Lambrecht
Astrid Lambrecht
PNPaulo A. Maia Neto
Paulo A. Maia Neto
SRSerge Reynaud
Serge Reynaud

20 March 2009 in Physical Review A
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
PMPaula B. Monteiro
Paula B. Monteiro
PNPaulo A. Maia Neto
Paulo A. Maia Neto
HNH. Moysés Nussenzveig
H. Moysés Nussenzveig
We investigate in detail the focusing of a circularly polarized Laguerre-Gaussian laser beam [ℏℓ orbital angular momentum per photon; σ=1(−1) for left- (right-) handed polarization] by a high-numerical-aperture objective. The diffraction-limited focused beam has unexpected properties resulting from a strong interplay between the angular spatial structure and the local polarization in the nonparaxial regime. In the region near the beam axis, and provided that |ℓ|≥2 and ℓ and σ have opposite signs, the energy locally counterpropagates and the projection of the electric field onto the focal plane counter-rotates with respect to the circular polarization of the incident beam. We explicitly show that the total angular momentum flux per unit power is conserved after focusing, as expected by rotational symmetry, but the spin and orbital separate contributions change.

25 July 2005 in Physical Review A
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
PNPaulo A. Maia Neto
Paulo A. Maia Neto
ALAstrid Lambrecht
Astrid Lambrecht
SRSerge Reynaud
Serge Reynaud
We calculate the second-order roughness correction to the Casimir energy for two parallel metallic mirrors. Our results may also be applied to the plane-sphere geometry used in most experiments. The metallic mirrors are described by the plasma model, with arbitrary values for the plasma wavelength, the mirror separation, and the roughness correlation length, with the roughness amplitude remaining the smallest length scale for perturbation theory to hold. From the analysis of the intracavity field fluctuations, we obtain the Casimir energy correction in terms of generalized reflection operators, which account for diffraction and polarization coupling in the scattering by the rough surfaces. We present simple analytical expressions for several limiting cases, as well as numerical results that allow for a reliable calculation of the roughness correction in real experiments. The correction is larger than the result of the proximity force approximation, which is obtained from our theory as a limiting case (very smooth surfaces).

13 March 2006 in Physical Review Letters
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
RRRobson B. Rodrigues
Robson B. Rodrigues
PNPaulo A. Maia Neto
Paulo A. Maia Neto
ALAstrid Lambrecht
Astrid Lambrecht
SRSerge Reynaud
Serge Reynaud
We argue that the appropriate variable to study a nontrivial geometry dependence of the Casimir force is the lateral component of the Casimir force, which we evaluate between two corrugated metallic plates outside the validity of the proximity-force approximation. The metallic plates are described by the plasma model, with arbitrary values for the plasma wavelength, the plate separation, and the corrugation period, the corrugation amplitude remaining the smallest length scale. Our analysis shows that in realistic experimental situations the proximity-force approximation overestimates the force by up to 30%.

29 July 2008 in Physical Review A
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
PNPaulo A. Maia Neto
Paulo A. Maia Neto
ALAstrid Lambrecht
Astrid Lambrecht
SRSerge Reynaud
Serge Reynaud
The Casimir energy is computed in the geometry of interest for the most precise experiments, a plane and a sphere in electromagnetic vacuum. The scattering formula is developed on adapted plane waves and multipole basis, leading to an expression valid for arbitrary relative values of the sphere radius and interplate distance. In the limiting case of perfect reflection, the electromagnetic result is found to depart from the commonly used proximity-force approximation (PFA) significantly more rapidly than expected from scalar computations.

23 February 2007 in Physical Review E
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
NVN. B. Viana
N. B. Viana
MRMarcio Rocha
Marcio Rocha
OMO. N. Mesquita
O. N. Mesquita
AMA. Mazolli
A. Mazolli
PNPaulo A. Maia Neto
Paulo A. Maia Neto
HNH. M. Nussenzveig
H. M. Nussenzveig
Aiming at absolute force calibration of optical tweezers, following a critical review of proposed theoretical models, we present and test the results of Mie-Debye-spherical aberration (MDSA) theory, an extension of a previous (MD) model, taking account of spherical aberration at the glass-water interface. This first-principles theory is formulated entirely in terms of experimentally accessible parameters (none adjustable). Careful experimental tests of the MDSA theory, undertaken at two laboratories, with very different setups, are described. A detailed description is given of the procedures employed to measure laser beam waist, local beam power at the transparent microspheres trapped by the tweezers, microsphere radius, and the trap transverse stiffness, as a function of radius and height in the (inverted microscope) sample chamber. We find generally very good agreement with MDSA theory predictions, for a wide size range, from the Rayleigh domain to large radii, including the values most often employed in practice, and at different chamber heights, both with objective overfilling and underfilling. The results asymptotically approach geometrical optics in the mean over size intervals, as they should, and this already happens for size parameters not much larger than unity. MDSA predictions for the trapping threshold, position of stiffness peak, stiffness variation with height, multiple equilibrium points, and “hopping” effects among them are verified. Remaining discrepancies are ascribed to focus degradation, possibly arising from objective aberrations in the infrared, not yet included in MDSA theory.