Purpose: Hans and coworkers previously developed an immunohistochemical algorithm with ∼80% concordance with the gene expression profiling (GEP) classification of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) into the germinal center B-cell–like (GCB) and activated B-cell–like (ABC) subtypes. Since then, new antibodies specific to germinal center B-cells have been developed, which might improve the performance of an immunostain algorithm.Experimental Design: We studied 84 cases of cyclophosphamide-doxorubicin-vincristine-prednisone (CHOP)–treated DLBCL (47 GCB, 37 ABC) with GCET1, CD10, BCL6, MUM1, FOXP1, BCL2, MTA3, and cyclin D2 immunostains, and compared different combinations of the immunostaining results with the GEP classification. A perturbation analysis was also applied to eliminate the possible effects of interobserver or intraobserver variations. A separate set of 63 DLBCL cases treated with rituximab plus CHOP (37 GCB, 26 ABC) was used to validate the new algorithm.Results: A new algorithm using GCET1, CD10, BCL6, MUM1, and FOXP1 was derived that closely approximated the GEP classification with 93% concordance. Perturbation analysis indicated that the algorithm was robust within the range of observer variance. The new algorithm predicted 3-year overall survival of the validation set [GCB (87%) versus ABC (44%); P < 0.001], simulating the predictive power of the GEP classification. For a group of seven primary mediastinal large B-cell lymphoma, the new algorithm is a better prognostic classifier (all “GCB”) than the Hans' algorithm (two GCB, five non-GCB).Conclusion: Our new algorithm is significantly more accurate than the Hans' algorithm and will facilitate risk stratification of DLBCL patients and future DLBCL research using archival materials. (Clin Cancer Res 2009;15(17):5494–502)

The body of literature concerning studies of the applications of CRP measurement in the pediatric population continues to grow. Based on current data serial CRP measurements appear to be most useful for monitoring patient response to therapy after the primary diagnosis of invasive infectious or inflammatory diseases, for monitoring patients after major surgical procedures and those with serious burns. Monitoring CRP over time may be used to assess for recrudescent disease, a secondary process or ineffective therapy. In addition CRP appears to be suited to most applications for which the ESR is used but offers many advantages. At present there are no objective outcome-based clinical trial data to justify using CRP values alone, whether elevated or normal, as a basis for management decisions regarding instituting or withholding antimicrobial therapy, or its early discontinuance for patients suspected of having neonatal sepsis, meningitis, bacteremia or pneumonia, regardless of immune status. In addition, because of significant inconsistencies among studies for which CRP has been applied to differential diagnosis of bacterial vs. viral diseases, including meningitis, acute otitis media and lower respiratory tract infection, we cannot recommend it for this purpose. Data do not support a role for CRP in differential diagnosis of acute appendicitis or for localizing urinary tract infections.

Bortezomib, a proteasome inhibitor with efficacy in multiple myeloma, is associated with thrombocytopenia, the cause and kinetics of which are different from those of standard cytotoxic agents. We assessed the frequency, kinetics, and mechanism of thrombocytopenia following treatment with bortezomib 1.3 mg/m2 in 228 patients with relapsed and/or refractory myeloma in 2 phase 2 trials. The mean platelet count decreased by approximately 60% during treatment but recovered rapidly between treatments in a cyclic fashion. Among responders, the pretreatment platelet count increased significantly during subsequent cycles of therapy. The mean percent reduction in platelets was independent of baseline platelet count, M-protein concentration, and marrow plasmacytosis. Plasma thrombopoietin levels inversely correlated with platelet count. Murine studies demonstrated a reduction in peripheral platelet count following a single bortezomib dose without negative effects on megakaryocytic cellularity, ploidy, or morphology. These data suggest that bortezomib-induced thrombocytopenia is due to a reversible effect on megakaryocytic function rather than a direct cytotoxic effect on megakaryocytes or their progenitors. The exact mechanism underlying bortezomib-induced thrombocytopenia remains unknown but it is unlikely to be related to marrow injury or decreased thrombopoietin production.