Pan Wang

Dr. Pan Wang

Singapore Institute of Manufacturing Technology, A*STAR
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

19Years (2008-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 February 2018 in Materials & Design
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
YKY. Kok
Y. Kok
XTXipeng Tan
Xipeng Tan
Pan WangPan Wang
Pan Wang
MNM.L.S. Nai
M.L.S. Nai
NLN.H. Loh
N.H. Loh
STS.B. Tor
S.B. Tor

1 February 2017 in Materials & Design
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ZBZhang Baicheng
Zhang Baicheng
LXLee Xiaohua
Lee Xiaohua
BJBai Jiaming
Bai Jiaming
GJGuo Junfeng
Guo Junfeng
Pan WangPan Wang
Pan Wang
WJWei Jun
Wei Jun

1 April 2019 in Materials & Design
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
Pan WangPan Wang
Pan Wang
PHPengfei Huang
Pengfei Huang
FNFern Lan Ng
Fern Lan Ng
WSWai Jack Sin
Wai Jack Sin
SLShenglu Lu
Shenglu Lu
JWJun Wei
Jun Wei

22 September 2017 in Materials
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Pan WangPan Wang
Pan Wang
WSWai Jack Sin
Wai Jack Sin
Sharon NaiSharon Nai
Sharon Nai
WJWei Jun
Wei Jun
As one of the powder bed fusion additive manufacturing technologies, electron beam melting (EBM) is gaining more and more attention due to its near-net-shape production capacity with low residual stress and good mechanical properties. These characteristics also allow EBM built parts to be used as produced without post-processing. However, the as-built rough surface introduces a detrimental influence on the mechanical properties of metallic alloys. Thereafter, understanding the effects of processing parameters on the part’s surface roughness, in turn, becomes critical. This paper has focused on varying the processing parameters of two types of contouring scanning strategies namely, multispot and non-multispot, in EBM. The results suggest that the beam current and speed function are the most significant processing parameters for non-multispot contouring scanning strategy. While for multispot contouring scanning strategy, the number of spots, spot time, and spot overlap have greater effects than focus offset and beam current. The improved surface roughness has been obtained in both contouring scanning strategies. Furthermore, non-multispot contouring scanning strategy gives a lower surface roughness value and poorer geometrical accuracy than the multispot counterpart under the optimized conditions. These findings could be used as a guideline for selecting the contouring type used for specific industrial parts that are built using EBM.

1 April 2021 in Materials & Design
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
YIYuuka Iijima
Yuuka Iijima
TNTakeshi Nagase
Takeshi Nagase
AMAira Matsugaki
Aira Matsugaki
Pan WangPan Wang
Pan Wang
KAKei Ameyama
Kei Ameyama
Takayoshi NakanoTakayoshi Nakano
Takayoshi Nakano