Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy is changing the paradigm in hematologic malignancies, but disparities in access exist in the real-world setting. Efforts to address and eliminate these disparities will ensure availability of this life-saving therapy. This study aimed to determine patterns of racial/ethnic distribution, socioeconomic strata, insurance coverage, and travel time of CAR T cell recipients. We used the Vizient Clinical Database (CDB) to capture and analyze elective encounters for CAR T administration as well as encounters for any reason other than CAR T administration (non-CAR T) in patients with lymphoma, myeloma, and acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Travel time and median household income were calculated based on ZIP code of residence. We found that African Americans (AA) were less likely than other racial/ethnic groups to receive CAR T cell therapy. In addition, AA and Hispanic participants were underrepresented in clinical trials. Among the patients with myeloma, all of whom received CAR T cell therapy on a clinical trial, only 1% were African American and 5.4% were Hispanic, and only 7.3% of CAR T cell therapy-related admissions were of patients from neighborhoods with a mean income <$40,000. Almost one-third of the CAR T cell recipients lived >2 hours away from the center in which they were treated; the majority of these patients were from the higher socioeconomic stratum (P < .001). There were fewer patients with Medicare and uninsured patients in the CAR T cell group. Our data indicate that socioeconomic stratum and insurance coverage are important underlying determinants of the identified disparities. Low clinical trial enrollment of minorities also feeds the inequity. Strategies to improve access need to be framed around addressing the causes for the observed disparities.

Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) from a haploidentical (haplo) donor has emerged as a suitable alternative in the absence of a matched donor. However, haplo-HCT patients have a higher risk of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). Hence, bone marrow (BM) stem cell source and post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) have been routinely used to help mitigate this. Due to ease of collection, peripheral blood (PB) stem cells are increasingly being considered for haplo-HCT. We retrospectively analyzed 74 patients (42 BM and 32 PB) who underwent haplo-HCT at Ohio State University from 2009 to 2018. Median age at transplant was 60 years (yrs) for BM and 54 yrs for PB, (p = 0.45). There was no difference in OS (p = 0.13) and NRM (p = 0.75) as well as PFS (p = 0.10) or GRFS (p = 0.90) between the groups. The BM cohort showed a 3-year OS rate of 63% (95% confidence interval (CI): 46–76), and 3-year PFS of 49% (95% CI: 33–63). For the PB group, 3-year OS and PFS were 78% (95% CI: 59–89) and 68% (95% CI: 49–82), respectively. There were no differences in the incidence of acute GVHD (grade II-IV) (p = 0.31) and chronic GVHD (p = 0.18). Patients receiving BM had a significantly higher risk for relapse with relapse rates by 2 years at 36% (95% CI: 22–50) vs. 16% (95% CI: 6–31) for PB (p = 0.03). The findings from this study suggest that PB is an excellent alternative to BM for haplo-HCT.

Role of platelet-albumin-bilirubin score in predicting re-bleeding after band ligation for acute variceal hemorrhage

CEBPA variants are frequently recurring in acute myeloid leukemia (AML). The prognostic significance of CEBPA mutations has recently undergone a major shift in the 5th edition of WHO classification of hematological neoplasms and ELN 2022 classification. Whereas prior iterations did not specify the type of CEBPA mutation, the updated schema specify that only mutations localized to the C-terminal basic zipper (bZIP) domain are considered prognostically favorable. This change is based primarily on three recently published large datasets evaluating the prognostic significance of mutation location in CEBPA mutant AML. Here, we review the evolution of the prognostic classification of CEBPA variants.