Inferior wisdom teeth extraction surgery may have some complications that, in some cases, could be prevented by a correct diagnosis and minimal surgery. Coronectomy is a technique used for wisdom teeth surgery where only the crown is extracted and the root/roots are left in situ. This procedure may be controversial, but it could limit the common risks of the extraction procedure. Nowadays, the indication and contraindication of this technique are debated, and clinicians normally extract the entire tooth. The following case series includes the data and follow-up radiographs of 130 patients who received a coronectomy, reporting the safety of the procedure. After a mean follow-up period of four years, no complications occurred. A total of 13 patients showed mobile roots but had no complications or symptoms. The roots migrated in a mesial or coronal direction in 31 patients; in 4 cases, they were removed because of patient preference. Coronectomy is a useful oral surgical procedure in certain complicated cases of mandibular wisdom tooth extraction.

Background: After tooth extraction, the alveolar bone loses volume in height and width over time, meaning that reconstructive procedures may be necessary to perform implant placement. In the maxilla, to increase the bone volume, a mini-invasive surgery, such as a sinus lift using the crestal approach, could be performed. Methods: A crestal approach was used in this study to perform the sinus lift, fracturing the bone and inserting collagen (Condress^®). The single dental implant was placed in the healed bone after six months. Results: The newly formed bone was histologically analyzed after healing. Histomorphological analyses confirmed the quality of the new bone formation even without graft biomaterials. This is probably due to the enlargement of the space, meaning more vascularization and stabilization of the coagulum. Conclusion: Using just collagen could be sufficient to induce proper new bone formation in particular clinical situations, with a minimally invasive surgery to perform a sinus lift.

Background: Orthopantomography (OPG) is usually used as a primary diagnostic radiological exam in the planning of third molar surgery because it is deeply available in dental clinics and has lower radiation doses compared to Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). The OPG provides a bi-dimensional image, but several radiological signs have been proposed to study the position of the lower third molar and to predict surgical risks. Methods: Patients were divided into two groups, the OPG with a radiolucent area (D-group) and the OPG without any sign (C-group) in correspondence of inferior wisdom tooth roots. Results: The mean distance between the inferior third molar root and the lingual cortical mandibular bone was −1.09 ± 1.5 mm. The nearness of the root that is less than 1 mm was more frequent in the D-group (84.85%) compared to the C-group (14.58%) with statistical significance (Odd ratio: 32.8) using the Chi-square test. Conclusions: When the root of the impacted inferior third molar is impacted into the lingual cortical plate, a periapical band-like radiolucent sign may appear in the OPG image. It could be useful for the prediction of root position and surgical risks.

The reconstruction of a severely resorbed alveolar bone is a significant challenge in dental implantology and maxillofacial surgery. Traditional bone grafting materials, including autogenous, allogeneic, xenogeneic, and alloplastic materials, have limitations such as donor site morbidity, limited availability, and prolonged maturation periods. To address these challenges, recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 (rhBMP-2) has emerged as a potent osteoinductive factor that facilitates bone regeneration without the need for additional donor site surgery. This study introduces a box technique which combines rhBMP-2 (CowellBMP^®, Cowellmedi, Busan, Republic of Korea) with a 3D-preformed titanium mesh (3D-PFTM), utilizing a mixture of allografts and xenografts for horizontal and vertical alveolar ridge augmentation. The technique leverages the structural stability provided by the OssBuilder^® (Osstem, Seoul, Republic of Korea), a preformed titanium mesh, that allows for simultaneous implant placement and vertical ridge augmentation. This technique not only reduces the treatment time compared to traditional methods but also minimizes post-operative discomfort by eliminating the need for autogenous bone harvesting. Clinical outcomes from this technique demonstrate successful bone regeneration within a shorter period than previously reported techniques, with excellent bone quality and implant stability being observed just four months after vertical augmentation. In conclusion, the so called BOXAM (BMP-2, Oss-builder, Xenograft, Allograft, Maintenance) technique presents a promising therapeutic strategy for alveolar bone reconstruction, particularly in cases of severe bone resorption. Further studies are needed to evaluate the long-term outcomes and potential limitations of this approach, especially in scenarios where the inferior alveolar nerve proximity poses challenges for fixture placement.

Introduction: The aim of this study was to investigate the spatial relationship between the incisive canal (IC) and apical region of the maxillary central incisors in the Korean population, using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) imaging. The findings are intended to inform and improve the planning and execution of immediate implant placement in the maxillary esthetic zone. Materials and methods: CBCT data were collected from 94 patients (48 men, 46 women) aged 20–79 years at Gangnam Dental Clinic, Seoul, South Korea. The sample was divided according to age into three groups: 20–39 years, 40–59 years, and 60–79 years. Exclusion criteria included missing maxillary anterior teeth, severe crowding, periodontitis, pathology, and image artifacts. Measurements of the distance from the root apex to the incisive canal (RIC-11-P, RIC-21-P) and from the root apex to the buccal bone (RBB-11-B, RBB-21-B) were taken from CBCT images. Statistical analyses were conducted using Welch’s t-test, ANOVA, and Pearson correlation, with significance set at p < 0.05. Results: The mean distances from the root apex to the incisive canal were 3.77 mm (RIC-11-P) and 3.62 mm (RIC-21-P), while the mean distances to the buccal bone were 0.86 mm and 0.94 mm, respectively. Males exhibited significantly greater distances compared to females, both in the NPC-to-root apex and buccal bone measurements. Age-related variations were observed, with younger individuals showing shorter distances from the IC to the root apex. However, ANOVA tests and Pearson correlation analysis indicated no statistically significant correlation in these distances across different age groups. The study highlights significant gender differences in maxillary central incisor anatomy, with males having larger distances from the root apex to both the IC and buccal bone, which has implications for implant placement. While age-related changes were observed, they did not significantly affect the mean distances in a statistically meaningful way. Conclusions: These findings underscore the need for personalized treatment planning in immediate implant placement, particularly in relation to gender and age. Comparisons with other population studies suggest that these anatomical differences may be consistent across various ethnic groups, though individual variance factors should still be considered.