Background: Preoperative radiographic templating for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has been shown to be inaccurate. Patient demographic data, such as gender, height, weight, age, and race, may be more predictive of implanted component size in TKA.Materials and methods: A multivariate linear regression model was designed to predict implanted femoral and tibial component size using demographic data along a consecutive series of 201 patients undergoing index TKA. Traditional, two-dimensional, radiographic templating was compared to demographic-based regression predictions on a prospective 181 consecutive patients undergoing index TKA in their ability to accurately predict intraoperative implanted sizes. Surgeons were blinded of any predictions.Results: Patient gender, height, weight, age, and ethnicity/race were predictive of implanted TKA component size. The regression model more accurately predicted implanted component size compared to radiographically templated sizes for both the femoral (P = 0.04) and tibial (P < 0.01) components. The regression model exactly predicted femoral and tibial component sizes in 43.7 and 43.7% of cases, was within one size 90.1 and 95.6% of the time, and was within two sizes in every case. Radiographic templating exactly predicted 35.4 and 36.5% of cases, was within one size 86.2 and 85.1% of the time, and varied up to four sizes for both the femoral and tibial components. The regression model averaged within 0.66 and 0.61 sizes, versus 0.81 and 0.81 sizes for radiographic templating for femoral and tibial components.Conclusions: A demographic-based regression model was created based on patient-specific demographic data to predict femoral and tibial TKA component sizes. In a prospective patient series, the regression model more accurately and precisely predicted implanted component sizes compared to radiographic templating.Level of evidence: Prospective cohort, level II.

Extra-articular lower-leg deformities mandate unique considerations when planning total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Poor limb alignment may increase perioperative complications and cause early implant failure. This study reports on the safety and efficacy of staged, extra-articular deformity correction about the knee in the setting of osteoarthritis and TKA. A retrospective review was conducted from December 2007 to December 2019 identifying 30 deformities in 27 patients (average age: 52.7 years; range 31-74) who underwent staged surgical correction of extra-articular deformity in preparation for TKA. Patient demographics, surgical details, clinical and radiographic measurements, severity of knee arthritis, and complications were collected. There were 17 femur and 12 tibia deformities. There was an average improvement of 14.7° of deformity measured in the coronal plane and 12.7° of deformity in the sagittal plane in the femur and 13.5° in the coronal plane and 10.3° in the sagittal plane in the tibia. Leg length discrepancies improved by 26 mm on average (1-100 mm). After an average 3.1-year follow-up, 12 out of 27 patients proceeded with primary or revision TKA. There were no cases of blood transfusion, nerve palsy, or compartment syndrome, and all patients achieved bony union. Staged, extra-articular deformity correction is a safe and effective approach to improve limb alignment in the setting of knee osteoarthritis and TKA.

A mathematically directed osteotomy (MDO) is a surgical planning technique for correcting long bone deformities. Using a mathematically derived osteotomy plane, the single-cut correction simultaneously addresses angular deformity, axial malrotation, and minor shortening. This review describes an MDO’s indications for use, defines its input and output variables, includes the required graphs for osteotomy planning, and provides intraoperative tips and tricks for successful execution. Finally, the authors present a digital MDO calculator to simplify the complex computations and allow for more precise planning.

Background: The prevalence, indications, and preferred methods for gastrocnemius recession and tendo-Achilles lengthening—grouped as triceps surae lengthening (TSL) procedures—in foot and ankle trauma are supported by a scarcity of clinical evidence. We hypothesize that injury, practice environment, and training heritage are significantly associated with probability of performing adjunctive TSL in the operative management of foot and ankle trauma. Methods: A survey was distributed to members of the American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society and the Orthopaedic Trauma Association. Participants rated how likely they would be to perform TSL at initial management, definitive fixation, and after weightbearing in the presence and absence of a positive Silfverskiöld test in 10 clinical scenarios of closed foot and ankle trauma. Results: A total of 258 surgeons with median 14 years’ experience responded. Eighty-five percent reported foot and ankle fellowship training, 24% reported traumatology fellowship training, 13% both, and 4% no fellowship. Ninety-nine percent reported performing TSL with a median 25 TSL procedures per year, 72% open gastrocnemius recession, and 17% percutaneous tendo-Achilles lengthening). Across all scenarios, we observed low overall 8% probability with fair agreement (κ = 0.246) of performing TSL (range, 1% at initial management of an unstable Weber B bimalleolar ankle fracture with negative contralateral Silfverskiöld test to 29% at definitive fixation of tongue-type calcaneus fracture with positive contralateral Silfverskiöld test). Silfverskiöld testing significantly influenced TSL probability at all time points. University of Washington training (β = 1.5, P = .007) but not trauma vs foot fellowship training, years in practice, academic practice, urban setting, or facility trauma designation were significantly associated with likelihood of performing TSL. Conclusion: Orthopaedic traumatology and foot and ankle surgeons report similar indications, methods, and low perceived propensity to use TSL in the management of foot and ankle trauma. We found that graduates of 1 fellowship training site were more likely to perform TSL in the setting of acute trauma potentially indicating the need for better scientific data to support this practice. Level of Evidence: Level V, therapeutic.

The aim of this study is to evaluate the outcomes of acute correction of large varus and valgus deformities with simultaneous distal femoral and tibial osteotomies. Acute correction of large coronal plane deformities is complex and if done incorrectly, can lead to problems like non-union, soft tissue problems, and joint line obliquity. Radiographic, clinical, and patient-reported outcomes are analysed through a retrospective series of 21 extremities in 18 consecutive patients with coexisting femoral and tibial deformities who underwent concurrent distal femoral and proximal tibial osteotomies with acute coronal plane correction and internal fixation. The mean mechanical axis deviation (MAD) correction was 56 mm for varus deformities (n = 13) and 45 mm for valgus deformities (n = 8) with an overall mean correction of the femoral tibial angle of 15° per extremity. The accuracy of correction was 92.9% compared to the goal MAD. Two patients had peri-incisional cellulitis that resolved with antibiotics. There was no incidence of non-union, deep vein thrombosis, compartment syndrome, deep infection, or peripheral nerve palsy. Patient-reported outcome scores had clinically meaningful improvements in pain, function, and mental health. Acute correction of large coronal plane deformities can be accurately and safely performed with simultaneous distal femoral and proximal tibial osteotomies with internal fixation. This study highlights a safe method to accurately correct large coronal plane deformities in the lower extremity. Wallace SJ, Jaime MK, Fragomen AT, et al. Dual Femoral and Tibial Osteotomies for Large Varus and Valgus Deformities. Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr 2024;19(3):135–140.