Dragan Savic

Prof. Dragan Savic

KWR Water Research Institute
+1
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

38Years (1989-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 March 1997 in Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Dragan SavicDragan Savic
Dragan Savic
GWGodfrey A. Walters
Godfrey A. Walters
The paper describes the development of a computer model GANET that involves the application of an area of evolutionary computing, better known as genetic algorithms, to the problem of least-cost design of water distribution networks. Genetic algorithms represent an efficient search method for nonlinear optimization problems; this method is gaining acceptance among water resources managers/planners. These algorithms share the favorable attributes of Monte Carlo techniques over local optimization methods in that they do not require linearizing assumptions nor the calculation of partial derivatives, and they avoid numerical instabilities associated with matrix inversion. In addition, their sampling is global, rather than local, thus reducing the tendency to become entrapped in local minima and avoiding dependency on a starting point. Genetic algorithms are introduced in their original form followed by different improvements that were found to be necessary for their effective implementation in the optimizatio...

24 February 2010 in Urban Water Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
RPRaido Puust
Raido Puust
ZKZ. Kapelan
Z. Kapelan
Dragan SavicDragan Savic
Dragan Savic
TKT. Koppel
T. Koppel
Leakage in water distribution systems is an important issue which is affecting water companies and their customers worldwide. It is therefore no surprise that it has attracted a lot of attention by both practitioners and researchers over the past years. Most of the leakage management related methods developed so far can be broadly classified as follows: (1) leakage assessment methods which are focusing on quantifying the amount of water lost; (2) leakage detection methods which are primarily concerned with the detection of leakage hotspots and (3) leakage control models which are focused on the effective control of current and future leakage levels. This paper provides a comprehensive review of the above methods with the objective to identify the current state-of-the-art in the field and to then make recommendations for future work. The review ends with the main conclusion that despite all the advancements made in the past, there is still a lot of scope and need for further work, especially in area of real-time models for pipe networks which should enable fusion of leakage detection, assessment and control methods.

1 December 2014 in Environmental Modelling & Software
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
HMHolger Robert Maier
Holger Robert Maier
ZKZ. Kapelan
Z. Kapelan
JKJoseph Kasprzyk
Joseph Kasprzyk
JKJ. Kollat
J. Kollat
LML.S. Matott
L.S. Matott
PRP.M. Reed
P.M. Reed
Not availableH.R. Maier, Z. Kapelan, Kasprzyk, J. Kollat, L.S. Matott, M.C. Cunha, G.C. Dandy, M.S. Gibbs, E. Keedwell, A. Marchi, A. Ostfeld, D. Savic, D.P. Solomatine, J.A. Vrugt, A.C. Zecchin, B.S. Minsker, E.J. Barbour, G. Kuczera, F. Pasha, A. Castelletti, M. Giuliani, P.M. Ree

1 July 2010 in Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JNJohn Nicklow
John Nicklow
PRPatrick Reed
Patrick Reed
Dragan SavicDragan Savic
Dragan Savic
TDTibebe Dessalegne
Tibebe Dessalegne
LHLaura Harrell
Laura Harrell
WEWater Resources Engineering
Water Resources Engineering
During the last two decades, the water resources planning and management profession has seen a dramatic increase in the development and application of various types of evolutionary algorithms (EAs). This observation is especially true for application of genetic algorithms, arguably the most popular of the several types of EAs. Generally speaking, EAs repeatedly prove to be flexible and powerful tools in solving an array of complex water resources problems. This paper provides a comprehensive review of state-of-the-art methods and their applications in the field of water resources planning and management. A primary goal in this ASCE Task Committee effort is to identify in an organized fashion some of the seminal contributions of EAs in the areas of water distribution systems, urban drainage and sewer systems, water supply and wastewater treatment, hydrologic and fluvial modeling, groundwater systems, and parameter identification. The paper also identifies major challenges and opportunities for the future, ...

1 November 2008 in Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Avi OstfeldAvi Ostfeld
Avi Ostfeld
JUJames G. Uber
James G. Uber
Elad SalomonsElad Salomons
Elad Salomons
JBJonathan W. Berry
Jonathan W. Berry
WHWilliam E. Hart
William E. Hart
TWTom Walski
Tom Walski
Following the events of September 11, 2001, in the United States, world public awareness for possible terrorist attacks on water supply systems has increased dramatically. Among the different threats for a water distribution system, the most difficult to address is a deliberate chemical or biological contaminant injection, due to both the uncertainty of the type of injected contaminant and its consequences, and the uncertainty of the time and location of the injection. An online contaminant monitoring system is considered as a major opportunity to protect against the impacts of a deliberate contaminant intrusion. However, although optimization models and solution algorithms have been developed for locating sensors, little is known about how these design algorithms compare to the efforts of human designers, and thus, the advantages they propose for practical design of sensor networks. To explore these issues, the Battle of the Water Sensor Networks (BWSN) was undertaken as part of the 8th Annual Water Distribution Systems Analysis Symposium, Cincinnati, Ohio, August 27–29, 2006. This paper summarizes the outcome of the BWSN effort and suggests future directions for water sensor networks research and implementation.

1 February 2006 in Desalination
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
DBD. Bixio
D. Bixio
CTC. Thoeye
C. Thoeye
JKJ. De Koning
J. De Koning
Darko JoksimovicDarko Joksimovic
Darko Joksimovic
Dragan SavicDragan Savic
Dragan Savic
TMT. Melin
T. Melin