Rebeca Serrano Zamora

Mrs. Rebeca Serrano Zamora


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

5Years (2022-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
30 April 2022 in Annals of Anatomy - Anatomischer Anzeiger
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
ÓVÓscar Iglesias Velázquez
Óscar Iglesias Velázquez
RZRebeca Serrano Zamora
Rebeca Serrano Zamora
RLRosa María López-Pintor
Rosa María López-Pintor
Francisco TresguerresFrancisco Tresguerres
Francisco Tresguerres
MARIA ISABEL LECO BERROCALMARIA ISABEL LECO BERROCAL
MARIA ISABEL LECO BERROCAL
Jesús TorresJesús Torres
Jesús Torres
Implant rehabilitation of posterior mandibular defects is frequently associated to a horizontal bone loss. There exist several regenerative techniques to supply this bone deficiency, one of which is the Periosteal Pocket Flap Technique (PPF) proposed by Steigmann et al. to treat small horizontal bone defects. The present study proposes a modification of this technique based on the concurrent use of PPF with the use of xenogeneic and autologous bone and Plasma Rich in Growth Factors (PRGF). The aim of this study is to evaluate clinical and radiographic outcomes of the PPF with the use of xenogeneic and autologous bone and PRGF in comparison with conventional Guided Bone Regeneration (GBR) procedures. Nine patients were enroled in the study (7 women and 2 men, mean age: 53 ± 2.74 years) and allocated to PPF or GBR. In both groups implant placement was performed simultaneously to bone regeneration. Preoperative CBCT scans were performed for each patient. Surgical time and postoperative pain were recorded, as well as tissue healing. Moreover, horizontal bone gain (mm), graft surface area (mm2) and graft volume (mm3) were evaluated. Nine surgeries were performed: 6 PPF and 3 GBR. Regarding clinical outcomes, operative time was significative greater in GBR group than in PPF group (51.67 ± 3.51 min vs. 37 ± 5.69 min; p = 0.008). Postoperative pain was higher in GBR compared to PPF (p = 0.011). Regarding radiographical results, there were not significant differences in horizontal bone gain (PPF: 9.43 ± 1.8 mm; GBR: 9.28 ± 0.42 mm), surface area (PPF: 693.33 ± 118.73 mm2; GBR: 655.61 ± 102.43 mm2), and volume (PPF: 394.97 ± 178.72 mm3; GBR: 261.66 ± 118 mm3) between groups. This prospective study demonstrates that the combination of autograft/xenograft and PRGF in PPF technique is a simpler, cheaper, and faster technique than GBR technique for achieving moderate lateral bone augmentation in implant treatment. Future randomised clinical studies are needed to confirm the results.

1 December 2022 in Frontiers of Oral and Maxillofacial Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
RZRebeca Serrano Zamora
Rebeca Serrano Zamora
ÓVÓscar Iglesias Velázquez
Óscar Iglesias Velázquez
BGBaoluo Xing Gao
Baoluo Xing Gao
CCCarmen Martín Carreras-Presas
Carmen Martín Carreras-Presas
JLJuan López-Quiles
Juan López-Quiles
Immediate versus conventional loading (IL vs. CL) influence on implant marginal bone loss (MBL): a narrative review Rebeca Serrano Zamora, Óscar Iglesias Velázquez, Baoluo Xing Gao, Carmen Martín Carreras-Presas, Juan López-Quiles