Daniel Laucirica

Mr. Daniel Laucirica

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

6Years (2021-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
12 August 2023 in Cells
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
RFRohan Flint
Rohan Flint
DLDaniel Laucirica
Daniel Laucirica
HCHak-Kim Chan
Hak-Kim Chan
BCBarbara Chang
Barbara Chang
SSStephen M. Stick
Stephen M. Stick
AKAnthony Kicic
Anthony Kicic
Pulmonary bacterial infections present a significant health risk to those with chronic respiratory diseases (CRDs) including cystic fibrosis (CF) and chronic-obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). With the emergence of antimicrobial resistance (AMR), novel therapeutics are desperately needed to combat the emergence of resistant superbugs. Phage therapy is one possible alternative or adjunct to current antibiotics with activity against antimicrobial-resistant pathogens. How phages are administered will depend on the site of infection. For respiratory infections, a number of factors must be considered to deliver active phages to sites deep within the lung. The inhalation of phages via nebulization is a promising method of delivery to distal lung sites; however, it has been shown to result in a loss of phage viability. Although preliminary studies have assessed the use of nebulization for phage therapy both in vitro and in vivo, the factors that determine phage stability during nebulized delivery have yet to be characterized. This review summarizes current findings on the formulation and stability of liquid phage formulations designed for nebulization, providing insights to maximize phage stability and bactericidal activity via this delivery method.

1 November 2021 in Journal of Cystic Fibrosis
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
LGLuke Garratt
Luke Garratt
OBOded Breuer
Oded Breuer
CSCraig J Schofield
Craig J Schofield
SMSamantha McLean
Samantha McLean
DLDaniel Laucirica
Daniel Laucirica
OCOn Behalf Of Arest Cf
On Behalf Of Arest Cf

11 April 2022 in Immunology & Cell Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
DLDaniel Laucirica
Daniel Laucirica
CSCraig J Schofield
Craig J Schofield
SMSamantha McLean
Samantha McLean
CMCamilla Margaroli
Camilla Margaroli
PAPatricia Agudelo-Romero
Patricia Agudelo-Romero
ACAustralian Respiratory Early Surveillance Team for CF (AREST CF)
Australian Respiratory Early Surveillance Team for CF (AREST CF)
A population of neutrophils recruited into cystic fibrosis (CF) airways is associated with proteolytic lung damage, exhibiting high expression of primary granule exocytosis marker CD63 and reduced phagocytic receptor CD16. Causative factors for this population are unknown, limiting intervention. Here we present a laboratory model to characterize responses of differentiated airway epithelium and neutrophils following respiratory infection. Pediatric primary airway epithelial cells were cultured at the air–liquid interface, challenged individually or in combination with rhinovirus (RV) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa, then apically washed with medical saline to sample epithelial infection milieus. Cytokine multiplex analysis revealed epithelial antiviral signals, including IP‐10 and RANTES, increased with exclusive RV infection but were diminished if P. aeruginosa was also present. Proinflammatory signals interleukin‐1α and β were dominant in P. aeruginosa infection milieus. Infection washes were also applied to a published model of neutrophil transmigration into the airways. Neutrophils migrating into bacterial and viral–bacterial co‐infection milieus exhibited the in vivo CF phenotype of increased CD63 expression and reduced CD16 expression, while neutrophils migrating into milieus of RV‐infected or uninfected cultures did not. Individually, bacterial products lipopolysaccharide and N‐formylmethionyl‐leucyl‐phenylalanine and isolated cytokine signals only partially activated this phenotype, suggesting that additional soluble factors in the infection microenvironment trigger primary granule release. Findings identify P. aeruginosa as a trigger of acute airway inflammation and neutrophil primary granule exocytosis, underscoring potential roles of airway microbes in prompting this neutrophil subset. Further studies are required to characterize microbes implicated in primary granule release, and identify potential therapeutic targets.

13 August 2021 in Pathogens
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SMSamantha McLean
Samantha McLean
LCLeilani Cullen
Leilani Cullen
DGDianne Gardam
Dianne Gardam
CSCraig J. Schofield
Craig J. Schofield
DLDaniel Laucirica
Daniel Laucirica
WAWaerp
Waerp
Aspergillus is increasingly associated with lung inflammation and mucus plugging in early cystic fibrosis (CF) disease during which conidia burden is low and strains appear to be highly diverse. It is unknown whether clinical Aspergillus strains vary in their capacity to induce epithelial inflammation and mucus production. We tested the hypothesis that individual colonising strains of Aspergillus fumigatus would induce different responses. Ten paediatric CF Aspergillus isolates were compared along with two systemically invasive clinical isolates and an ATCC reference strain. Isolates were first characterised by ITS gene sequencing and screened for antifungal susceptibility. Three clusters (A−C) of Aspergillus isolates were identified by ITS. Antifungal susceptibility was variable, particularly for itraconazole. Submerged CF and non-CF monolayers as well as differentiated primary airway epithelial cell cultures were incubated with conidia for 24 h to allow germination. None of the clinical isolates were found to significantly differ from one another in either IL-6 or IL-8 release or gene expression of secretory mucins. Clinical Aspergillus isolates appear to be largely homogenous in their mucostimulatory and immunostimulatory capacities and, therefore, only the antifungal resistance characteristics are likely to be clinically important.

26 February 2026 in bioRxiv
Verified
Preprint
Open access
PDF file
DLDaniel Laucirica
Daniel Laucirica
PCPhoebe G. Carr
Phoebe G. Carr
MHMitchell G. Hedges
Mitchell G. Hedges
AVAndrew Vaitekenas
Andrew Vaitekenas
ZVZlatibor Velickovic
Zlatibor Velickovic
PWPhage Wa
Phage Wa
Aims: Bacteriophage (phage) propagation has traditionally relied on bacterial culture media containing animal-derived ingredients; however, safety concerns with animal-derived materials for production of phages for therapeutic use limit their acceptability. We compared animal-free and traditional media formulations, and evaluated their effects on phage yield, bactericidal activity, and genomic characteristics, hypothesizing no significant differences would be observed. Methods and Results: Phages targeting Pseudomonas aeruginosa (n=8) and Staphylococcus aureus (n=1) were propagated in solid and liquid media containing animal-free (AF) or animal-derived (LB) peptones. Kinetic assays were used to assess phage suppression of host bacterial growth. In a mock therapeutic phage screen, spot tests, Efficiency of Plating (EOP) and kinetic assays were performed against novel bacterial targets. Whole genome sequencing of phages and their bacterial hosts propagated in AF or LB broth was used to observe genomic differences between formulations. Animal-free peptone did not impact phage yield, with both AF and LB phage stocks growing to high titers (≥10 8 PFU/mL). Kinetic assay results showed similar suppression indices for AF and LB-grown phages. Likewise, phage screen spot test, EOP, and kinetic assay results were similar between AF and LB phages. Comparisons of phage and bacterial genome annotations showed no major differences arising from media formulation. Conclusions: Findings suggest animal-free peptones do not significantly alter phage yield, bactericidal activity, or genomic characteristics, supporting use of animal-free medium for medicinal phage manufacture. This is one of the first studies to systematically combine phenotypic and genomic assessment of phages and hosts across animal-free and traditional media. Impact Statement: Phage therapy is increasingly used to treat antimicrobial resistance infections. Emerging guidelines and regulations for the manufacture of phage therapeutics will impact laboratory processes and materials used for phage production. Here, we explored the use of an animal-free medium for medicinal phage propagation, providing data on phage yield and metrics of phage activity.

31 August 2026 in medRxiv
Verified
Preprint
Open access
PDF file
KWK. Watts
K. Watts
Ruby CY LinRuby CY Lin
Ruby CY Lin
SLS. A. Lynch
S. A. Lynch
JWJ. Warning
J. Warning
JBJ. J. Barr
J. J. Barr
JIJ. R. Iredell
J. R. Iredell
Objective: As antimicrobial resistance (AMR) continues to threaten global public health, bacteriophage therapy products (BTPs) offer a promising alternative to conventional antimicrobials. However, translation into routine clinical practice requires best practice standards for manufacturing and quality control to ensure the consistent safety, quality, and reliability of personalised BTPs produced for individual patients or small cohorts. Design: A modified Delphi methodology was used to develop consensus statements, engaging experts from Australia’s National Bacteriophage Therapy Regulatory Working Group across the fields of clinical microbiology, phage biology, good manufacturing practice (GMP), regulatory science, and government. The process comprised three iterative phases: (1) structured statement development, (2) an anonymous REDCap survey, and (3) a hybrid consensus meeting. The strength of evidence and recommendations was assessed using the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) framework. Results: Consensus was reached on 35 statements to provide best practice manufacture and quality control guidance for BTPs. These statements address requirements for phage identification and characterisation; define the point at which GMP-aligned processes commence for ubiquitous phages; outline quality control expectations for phage active pharmaceutical ingredient (pAPI) production and maintenance of BTP and host cell repositories. Additional guidance covers quality management systems, including documentation, traceability, and governance. Conclusion: These consensus statements provide comprehensive best practice recommendations for the manufacture and quality control of BTPs in Australia. By promoting consistent, safe, and quality-assured approaches to personalised BTPs, they aim to facilitate clinical implementation while remaining aligned with existing international pharmacopoeial standards and regulatory frameworks. Significance of this study: What is already known on this subject?: Bacteriophage Therapy Products (BTPs) have re-emerged as a potential solution to antimicrobial resistance (AMR), supported by growing clinical evidence and global research activity. Data available to the regulatory working party includes more than 70 high-risk patients treated with dozens of different bacteriophages under a national open-label protocol (unpubl.). Published guidance from the European Pharmacopoeia, European Medicines Agency (EMA), UK Medicines & Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA), and World Health Oragnization (WHO) exists, yet no practical standards for personalised BTP manufacture have been established. What are the new findings?: Recommendations have been made to define minimum quality and manufacturing stasndards for the safe, consistent production of BTPs. This is the first expert endorsed, risk-based framework to support the translation of personliased BTPs into routine clinical practice, cobering manufacture, repository management, quality control and supply. How might it impact on clinical practice in the foreseeable future?: These consensus statements, developed by Australia’s National Bacteriophage Therapy Regulatory Working Group, can assist researchers, clinicians and regulatory authorities to develop BTP production protocols.