Gerd Fastner

Dr. Gerd Fastner


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

14Years (2013-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Gabriel RinnerthalerGabriel Rinnerthaler
Gabriel Rinnerthaler
Hubert HacklHubert Hackl
Hubert Hackl
SGSimon Peter Gampenrieder
Simon Peter Gampenrieder
FHFrank Hamacher
Frank Hamacher
CHClemens Hufnagl
Clemens Hufnagl
RGRichard Greil
Richard Greil
For quantitative microRNA analyses in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue, expression levels have to be normalized to endogenous controls. To investigate the most stably-expressed microRNAs in breast cancer and its surrounding tissue, we used tumor samples from primary tumors and from metastatic sites. MiRNA profiling using TaqMan® Array Human MicroRNA Cards, enabling quantification of 754 unique human miRNAs, was performed in FFPE specimens from 58 patients with metastatic breast cancer. Forty-two (72%) samples were collected from primary tumors and 16 (28%) from metastases. In a cross-platform analysis of a validation cohort of 32 FFPE samples from patients with early breast cancer genome-wide microRNA expression analysis using SurePrintG3 miRNA (8 × 60 K)® microarrays from Agilent® was performed. Eleven microRNAs could be detected in all samples analyzed. Based on NormFinder and geNorm stability values and the high correlation (rho ≥ 0.8) with the median of all measured microRNAs, miR-16-5p, miR-29a-3p, miR-126-3p, and miR-222-3p are suitable single gene housekeeper candidates. In the cross-platform validation, 29 human microRNAs were strongly expressed (mean log2-intensity > 10) and 21 of these microRNAs including miR-16-5p and miR-29a-3p were also stably expressed (CV < 5%). Thus, miR-16-5p and miR-29a-3p are both strong housekeeper candidates. Their Normfinder stability values calculated across the primary tumor and metastases subgroup indicate that miR-29a-3p can be considered as the strongest housekeeper in a cohort with mainly samples from primary tumors, whereas miR-16-5p might perform better in a metastatic sample enriched cohort.

1 August 2013 in Radiotherapy and Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
GFGerd Fastner
Gerd Fastner
FSFelix Sedlmayer
Felix Sedlmayer
FMFlorian Merz
Florian Merz
HDHeinrich Deutschmann
Heinrich Deutschmann
RRRoland Reitsamer
Roland Reitsamer
VVVincenzo Valentini
Vincenzo Valentini

1 August 2020 in Radiotherapy and Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
GFGerd Fastner
Gerd Fastner
CGChristoph Gaisberger
Christoph Gaisberger
JKJulia Kaiser
Julia Kaiser
PSPhilipp Scherer
Philipp Scherer
ACAntonella Ciabattoni
Antonella Ciabattoni
MLMaria Cristina Leonardi
Maria Cristina Leonardi

19 January 2017 in Radiation Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
FSFelix Sedlmayer
Felix Sedlmayer
RRRoland Reitsamer
Roland Reitsamer
FWFrederik Wenz
Frederik Wenz
ESElena Sperk
Elena Sperk
CFChristoph Fussl
Christoph Fussl
GFGerd Fastner
Gerd Fastner
The term IORT (intraoperative radiotherapy) is currently used for various techniques that show huge differences in dose delivery and coverage of the tissue at risk. The largest evidence for boost IORT preceding whole breast irradiation (WBI) originates from intraoperative electron treatments (IOERT) with single doses around 10 Gy. At median follow-up periods at 6 years, outstandingly low local recurrence rates of less than 1% are observed. Higher local relapse rates were described for G3 tumors and triple negative breast cancers as well as for IORT following primary systemic treatment for locally advanced tumors. Even there, long term (>5y) local tumor control rates mostly beyond 95% were maintained. Compared to other boost methods, an intraoperative treatment has evident advantages in terms of precision (by avoiding a “spatial and/or temporal miss”), cosmetic outcome and patient comfort. Direct visualisation of a tumor bed during surgery guarantees for an accurate dose delivery, which has additionally gained importance in times of primary reconstruction techniques after lumpectomy, since IORT is performed before breast tissue including parts of the tumor bed is mobilized for plastic purposes. As a consequence of direct tissue exposure without distension by hematoma/seroma, IORT allows for small treatment volumes and complete skin sparing, both having a positive effect on late tissue tolerance and, hence, cosmetic appearance. Boost IORT marginally prolongs the surgical procedure, while significantly shortening postoperative radiotherapy. Its combination with external beam radiotherapy to the whole breast (WBI) is currently tested in two multicentric prospective trials: as kV-IORT in the multicentric TARGIT-B (oost) study, and as IOERT in the HIOB trial (3 weeks hypofractionated WBI preceded by IORT electron boost).


4 July 2014 in International Journal of Cancer
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
GFGerd Fastner
Gerd Fastner
RRRoland Reitsamer
Roland Reitsamer
IZIngrid Ziegler
Ingrid Ziegler
FZFranz Zehentmayr
Franz Zehentmayr
CFChristoph Fussl
Christoph Fussl
FSFelix Sedlmayer
Felix Sedlmayer
To evaluate retrospectively rates of local (LCR) and locoregional tumor control (LRCR) in patients with locally advanced breast cancer (LABC) who were treated with preoperative chemotherapy (primary systemic treatment, PST) followed by breast‐conserving surgery (BCS) and either intraoperative radiotherapy with electrons (IOERT) preceding whole‐breast irradiation (WBI) (Group 1) or with WBI followed by an external tumor bed boost (electrons or photons) instead of IOERT (Group 2). From 2002 to 2007, 83 patients with clinical Stage II or III breast cancer were enrolled in Group 1 and 26 in Group 2. All patients received PST followed by BCS and axillary lymph node dissection. IOERT boosts were applied by single doses of 9 Gy (90% reference isodose) versus external boosts of 12 Gy (median dose range, 6–16) in 2 Gy/fraction (ICRU). WBI in both groups was performed up to total doses of 51–57 Gy (1.7–1.8 Gy/fraction). The respective median follow‐up times for Groups 1 and 2 amount 59 months (range, 3–115) and 67.5 months (range, 13–120). Corresponding 6‐year rates for LCR, LRCR, metastasis‐free survival, disease‐specific survival and overall survival were 98.5, 97.2, 84.7, 89.2 and 86.4% for Group 1 and 88.1, 88.1, 74, 92 and 92% for Group 2, respectively, without any statistical significances. IOERT as boost modality during BCS in LABC after PST shows a trend to be superior in terms of LCR and LRCR in comparison with conventional boosts.