Mikkel Brandt

Dr. Mikkel Brandt

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

13Years (2014-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
25 November 2015 in BMC Public Health
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MJMarkus D. Jakobsen
Markus D. Jakobsen
ESEmil Sundstrup
Emil Sundstrup
MBMikkel Brandt
Mikkel Brandt
KJKenneth Jay
Kenneth Jay
PAPer Aagaard
Per Aagaard
LALars Louis Andersen
Lars Louis Andersen
Imbalance between individual resources and work demands can lead to musculoskeletal disorders and reduced work ability. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of workplace- versus home-based physical exercise on work ability among healthcare workers. Two hundred female healthcare workers (Age: 42.0, BMI: 24.1, work ability index [WAI]: 43.1) from 18 departments at three Danish hospitals participated (Copenhagen, Denmark, Aug 2013—Jan 2014). Participants were randomly allocated at the cluster level to 10 weeks of: 1) workplace physical exercise (WORK) performed during working hours for 5x10 min per week and up to 5 group-based coaching sessions on motivation for regular physical exercise, or 2) home-based physical exercise (HOME) performed during leisure time for 5x10 min per week. Both groups received ergonomic counseling on patient handling and use of lifting aides. The main outcome measure was the change from baseline to 10-week follow-up in WAI. Significant group by time interaction was observed for WAI (p < 0.05). WAI at follow-up was 1.1 (0.3 to 1.8) higher in WORK compared with HOME corresponding to a small effect size (Cohens’d = 0.24). Within-group changes indicated that between-group differences were mainly caused by a reduction in WAI in HOME. Of the seven items of WAI, item 2 (work ability in relation to the demands of the job) and item 5 (sickness absence during the past year) were improved in WORK compared with HOME (P < 0.05). Performing physical exercise together with colleagues at the workplace prevents deterioration of work ability among female healthcare workers. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01921764 . Registered 10 August 2013.

17 October 2016 in BioMed Research International
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ESEmil Sundstrup
Emil Sundstrup
MJMarkus Due Jakobsen
Markus Due Jakobsen
MBMikkel Brandt
Mikkel Brandt
KJKenneth Jay
Kenneth Jay
PAPer Aagaard
Per Aagaard
LALars Louis Andersen
Lars Louis Andersen
Chronic musculoskeletal pain is widespread in the working population and leads to muscular fatigue, reduced work capacity, and fear of movement. While ergonomic intervention is the traditional approach to the problem, physical exercise may be an alternative strategy. This secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial investigates the effect of strength training on muscular fatigue resistance and self-rated health among workers with chronic pain. Sixty-six slaughterhouse workers with chronic upper limb pain and work disability were randomly allocated to 10 weeks of strength training or usual care ergonomic training (control). At baseline and follow-up, participants performed a handgrip muscular fatigue test (time above 50% of maximal voluntary contraction force) with simultaneous recording of electromyography. Additionally, participants replied to a questionnaire regarding self-rated health and pain. Time to fatigue, muscle strength, hand/wrist pain, and self-rated health improved significantly more following strength training than usual care (allP<0.05). Time to fatigue increased by 97% following strength training and this change was correlated to the reduction in fear avoidance (Spearman’s rho=-0.40;P=0.01). In conclusion, specific strength training improves muscular fatigue resistance and self-rated health and reduces pain of the hand/wrist in manual workers with chronic upper limb pain. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.govNCT01671267.

19 December 2018 in Journal of Medical Internet Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
MBMikkel Brandt
Mikkel Brandt
PMPascal Madeleine
Pascal Madeleine
ASAfshin Samani
Afshin Samani
JAJeppe Zielinski Nguyen Ajslev
Jeppe Zielinski Nguyen Ajslev
MJMarkus D Jakobsen
Markus D Jakobsen
LALars Louis Andersen
Lars Louis Andersen
Journal of Medical Internet Research - International Scientific Journal for Medical Research, Information and Communication on the Internet #Preprint #PeerReviewMe: Warning: This is a unreviewed preprint. Readers are warned that the document has not been peer-reviewed by expert/patient reviewers or an academic editor, may contain misleading claims, and is likely to undergo changes before final publication, if accepted, or may have been rejected/withdrawn. Readers with interest and expertise are encouraged to sign up as peer-reviewer, if the paper is within an open peer-review period. Please cite this preprint only for review purposes or for grant applications and CVs (if you are the author). Background: Construction work consists of a high degree of heavy physical work and a reduction of the physical workload should have high priority. Technological development has made it possible to obtain field measurements with surface electromyography (sEMG), kinematics measured with inertial measurement units (IMU) and video recordings. However, no studies have used these methods simultaneously to detect events with excessive physical workload (events) during a working day. Thus, knowledge about these specific events may to combat work-related risk factors. Participatory ergonomics have shown promising results, but it is unknown if it can be used as a tool to reduce the physical workload during construction work. Objective: This cluster randomized controlled trial investigated whether a participatory ergonomics intervention with technical measurements consisting of inertial measurement unit (IMU), surface electromyography (sEMG), heart rate monitoring and video recordings of physical workload would reduce the number of events with excessive physical workload during a working day. Furthermore, other outcomes were obtained from questionnaires. Methods: Eighty full-time male construction workers (19-67 years) were randomized at the cluster level (gang) to a participatory ergonomics intervention consisting of three workshops (7 gangs, 32 workers) or to a control group (8 gangs, 48 workers). The physical workload was recorded by technical measurements, i.e., IMU, sEMG, heart rate monitoring and video recordings during a full working day at baseline and 3 and 6 months’ follow-up. Based on the technical measurements, a custom-made computer programme detected the situations (events) where the construction workers were exposed to excessive physical workload. Differences in the number of events from baseline to follow-up between intervention and control were evaluated using linear mixed models (intention-to-treat), with the individual nested in clusters as a random factor. Furthermore, questionnaires were filled out at test days. Results: The results of the primary outcome showed no change in the number of events with excessive physical workload. However, compared with the control group, the other outcomes showed decreased general fatigue after a typical working day (P < .001) and increased influence at work (P = .04). Conclusions: This participatory ergonomics intervention with technical measurements did not reduce the number of events with excessive physical workload during construction work. However, the intervention led to decreased general fatigue and increased influence at work. Clinical Trial: The trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02498197).

27 March 2014 in Pain Research and Treatment
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MBMikkel Brandt
Mikkel Brandt
ESEmil Sundstrup
Emil Sundstrup
MJMarkus D. Jakobsen
Markus D. Jakobsen
KJKenneth Jay
Kenneth Jay
JCJuan C. Colado
Juan C. Colado
LALars Louis Andersen
Lars Louis Andersen
Background. Neck/shoulder pain is a common musculoskeletal disorder among adults. The pain is often assumed to be related to muscular tenderness rather than serious chronic disease. Aim. To determine the association between neck/shoulder pain intensity and trapezius muscle tenderness in office workers. Methods. 653 employees from two large office workplaces in Copenhagen, Denmark, replied to a questionnaire on health and working conditions (mean: age 43 years, body mass index 24 kg·m−2, computer use 90% of work time, 73% women). Respondents rated intensity of neck/shoulder pain during the previous three months on a scale of 0–10 and palpable tenderness of the upper trapezius muscle on a scale of “no tenderness,” “some tenderness,” or “severe tenderness.” Odds ratios for tenderness as a function of neck/shoulder pain intensity were determined using cumulative logistic regression controlled for age, gender, and chronic disease. Results. The prevalence of “no,” “some,” and “severe” tenderness of the trapezius muscle was 18%, 59%, and 23% in women and 51%, 42%, and 7% in men, respectively (chi-square, P < 0.0001). Participants with “no,” “some,” and “severe” tenderness of the trapezius muscle, respectively, rated their neck/shoulder pain intensity to 1.5 (SD 1.6), 3.8 (SD 2.0), and 5.7 (SD 1.9) for women and 1.4 (SD 1.4), 3.1 (SD 2.2), and 5.1 (SD 1.7) for men. For every unit increase in neck/shoulder pain intensity, the OR for one unit increase in trapezius tenderness was 1.86 (95% confidence interval 1.70 to 2.04). Conclusion. In office workers, a strong association between perceived neck/shoulder pain intensity and trapezius muscle tenderness exists. The present study provides reference values of pain intensity among office workers with no, some, and severe tenderness of the trapezius muscle.

14 December 2017 in Ergonomics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
MBMikkel Brandt
Mikkel Brandt
PMPascal Madeleine
Pascal Madeleine
ASAfshin Samani
Afshin Samani
MJMarkus Due Jakobsen
Markus Due Jakobsen
SSSebastian Skals
Sebastian Skals
LALars Louis Andersen
Lars Louis Andersen
The aim was to classify lifting activities into low and high risk categories (according to The Danish Working Environment Authority guidelines) based on surface electromyography (sEMG) and trunk inclination (tri-axial accelerometer) measurements. Lifting tasks with different weights, horizontal distance and technique were performed. The lifting tasks were characterised by a feature vector composed of either the 90th, 95th or 99th percentile of sEMG activity level and trunk inclinations during the task. Linear Discriminant Analysis and a subject-specific threshold scheme were applied and lifting tasks were classified with an accuracy of 65.1–65.5%. When lifts were classified based on the subject-specific threshold scheme from low and upper back accelerometers, the accuracy reached 52.1–58.1% and 72.7–78.1%, respectively. In conclusion, the use of subject-specific thresholds from sEMG from upper trapezius and erector spinae as well as inclination of the upper trunk enabled us to identify low and high risk lifts with an acceptable accuracy. Practitioner Summary: This study contributes to the development of a method enabling the automatic detection of high risk lifting tasks, i.e. exposure to high biomechanical loads, based on individual sEMG and kinematics from an entire working day. These methods may be more cost-effective and may complement observations commonly used by practitioners.

10 October 2017 in BMC Public Health
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MJMarkus D. Jakobsen
Markus D. Jakobsen
ESEmil Sundstrup
Emil Sundstrup
MBMikkel Brandt
Mikkel Brandt
LALars Louis Andersen
Lars Louis Andersen
While benefits of workplace physical exercise on physical health is well known, little is known about the psychosocial effects of such initiatives. This study evaluates the effect of workplace versus home-based physical exercise on psychosocial factors among healthcare workers. A total of 200 female healthcare workers (Age: 42.0, BMI: 24.1) from 18 departments at three hospitals were cluster-randomized to 10 weeks of: 1) home-based physical exercise (HOME) performed alone during leisure time for 10 min 5 days per week or 2) workplace physical exercise (WORK) performed in groups during working hours for 10 min 5 days per week and up to 5 group-based coaching sessions on motivation for regular physical exercise. Vitality and mental health (SF-36, scale 0–100), psychosocial work environment (COPSOQ, scale 0–100), work- and leisure disability (DASH, 0–100), control- (Bournemouth, scale 0–10) and concern about pain (Pain Catastrophizing Scale, scale 0–10) were assessed at baseline and at 10-week follow-up. Vitality as well as control and concern about pain improved more following WORK than HOME (all p < 0.05) in spite of increased work pace (p < 0.05). Work- and leisure disability, emotional demands, influence at work, sense of community, social support and mental health remained unchanged. Between-group differences at follow-up (WORK vs. HOME) were 7 [95% confidence interval (95% CI) 3 to 10] for vitality, −0.8 [95% CI -1.3 to −0.3] for control of pain and −0.9 [95% CI -1.4 to −0.5] for concern about pain, respectively. Performing physical exercise together with colleagues during working hours was more effective than home-based exercise in improving vitality and concern and control of pain among healthcare workers. These benefits occurred in spite of increased work pace. NCT01921764 at ClinicalTrials.gov . Registered 10 August 2013.