Horvath Csaba

Dr. Horvath Csaba


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

11Years (2016-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 February 2018 in Science of The Total Environment
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
THTibor Hartel
Tibor Hartel
JHJan Hanspach
Jan Hanspach
CMCosmin I. Moga
Cosmin I. Moga
LHLucian Holban
Lucian Holban
ÁSÁrpád Szapanyos
Árpád Szapanyos
KRKinga-Olga Réti
Kinga-Olga Réti

10 July 2021 in Sustainability
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Sorin Daniel VâtcăSorin Daniel Vâtcă
Sorin Daniel Vâtcă
Valentina Ancuța StoianValentina Ancuța Stoian
Valentina Ancuța Stoian
Titus-Cristian MANTitus-Cristian MAN
Titus-Cristian MAN
HCHorvath Csaba
Horvath Csaba
Roxana VidicanRoxana Vidican
Roxana Vidican
Vlad StoianVlad Stoian
Vlad Stoian
Identifying regional variations and agronomical records can turn into a function of magnitude and timing for sustainable maize production. The crop characteristics are directly related with the temperature and precipitation from the growing season. Therefore, the main aim of this study was to highlight maize crop requirements from the most suggestive records from Romania. A literature search was performed based on keywords related to both maize crop and agrometeorological requirements. After the evaluation of the temperature requirements on maize phenology’s principal stages, some inconsistencies were identified. These are related to the leaf development stage and the development of the fruit stage, where the minimum temperature interval overlaps with the optimum. A wide variety of assessments were also made, taking into account mainly the monthly temperature and precipitation requirements. The number of principal growth stages assessed differed greatly from one source to another. The growth degree days has been incoherently expressed and calculated, and these details must be taken into account for developing further models. The results regarding phenology aim to propose the setting up of comparable records at a regional (PannEx area) and global scale. This review will help to develop new climate projections in Romania in the climate change context through the project Agroclim.

4 June 2019 in International Journal of Climatology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
GHGabriela‐Victoria Harpa
Gabriela‐Victoria Harpa
Adina-Eliza CroitoruAdina-Eliza Croitoru
Adina-Eliza Croitoru
VDVladimir Djurdjevic
Vladimir Djurdjevic
HCHorvath Csaba
Horvath Csaba
This paper presents the results of a study focused on the projected changes in extreme precipitation indices in Romania during three future periods: 2021–2040, 2041–2070, and 2071–2100. We investigated changes in future climate based on historical and modelled data sets of daily precipitation. We compared the values calculated for the three future periods with those obtained for the historical reference period 1961–1990. The historical observation data recorded at 30 weather stations and data extracted from six regional climate model outputs (ALADIN53, CCLM4‐8‐17, RACMO22E, RCA4, REMO2009, and WRF331F) under moderate (RCP4.5) and pessimistic (RCP8.5) scenarios were employed. Five indices established by the Expert Team for Climate Change Detection Monitoring and Indices were analysed: consecutive dry days, consecutive wet days, heavy precipitation days, very heavy precipitation days, and annual total wet‐day precipitation. The series of indices were generated using ClimPACT2 software. Based on bias correction methods, the quality of the modelled data considerably increased, and the errors obtained for the daily precipitation varied in the range of ±0.05 to ±1.22 mm/day. The main findings revealed an increase in three of the extreme precipitation indices based on all models considered compared to the historical period. The most important increase (more than 50%) compared to the historical period was detected in the frequency of very heavy precipitation days and the annual total wet‐day precipitation. They were followed by the heavy precipitation days index. The consecutive dry days index indicated mainly no change or a slow decrease, while inconsistencies among the results of regional climate models were detected for the consecutive wet days index. For all indices except the consecutive dry days index, the ALADIN53 and WRF331F models provided the highest projected values for both scenarios. The dispersion of values obtained as model output for each location was higher for RCP8.5 than for RCP4.5.

1 December 2016 in Zeitschrift für Geomorphologie
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
GRGheorghe Roșian
Gheorghe Roșian
HCHorvath Csaba
Horvath Csaba
RKRéti Kinga-Olga
Réti Kinga-Olga
CBCristian-Nicolae Boţan
Cristian-Nicolae Boţan
IGIonela Georgiana Gavrilă
Ionela Georgiana Gavrilă

25 June 2021 in Atmosphere
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Sidau RaulSidau Raul
Sidau Raul
HCHorvath Csaba
Horvath Csaba
MCMaria Ilinca Cheveresan
Maria Ilinca Cheveresan
ISIonut Sandric
Ionut Sandric
FSFlorin Stoica
Florin Stoica
The interaction between precipitation and vegetation plays a significant role in the formation of runoff, and it is still a widely discussed issue in hydrology. The difficulty lies in estimating the degree to which a forest influences runoff generation, especially flood peaks, on the one hand, due to the small amount of information regarding the evolution of the forest area and density, and, on the other hand, the correlations between these indicators and the runoff and precipitation values. The analysis focuses on a small basin in the mountain region of Romania, the upper basin of the Ruscova River located in northwestern Romania. In this river basin, there is no significant anthropic influence, other than the intense deforestation and reforestation actions. Using satellite images captured by Landsat missions 5, 7 and 8 for the period 1985–2019, the forest canopy density vegetation index was extracted. Using a gridded precipitation dataset, a hydrological model was calibrated based on three scenarios to assess the impact of forest vegetation on the runoff. Analysis of the results of these models conducted on scenarios allowed us to deduce a simple equation for estimating the influence of forest area on maximum river flows. The analysis showed that even small differences in the forest surface area exert an influence on the peak flow, varying between −5.28% and 8.09%.

19 September 2016 in Water, Air, & Soil Pollution
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MBMihail Simion Beldean-Galea
Mihail Simion Beldean-Galea
RMRadu Mihăiescu
Radu Mihăiescu
VAViorel Arghiuş
Viorel Arghiuş
Adina-Eliza CroitoruAdina-Eliza Croitoru
Adina-Eliza Croitoru
HCHorvath Csaba
Horvath Csaba
VCVirginia Coman
Virginia Coman