Summary: Background: Chemotherapy with gemcitabine and cisplatin is the current standard for patients with unresectable cholangiocarcinoma. Local photodynamic therapy has also demonstrated benefit in patients with extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.Aim: To evaluate the benefit of photodynamic therapy in combination with systemic chemotherapy in advanced extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.Methods: Three hundred and fifty‐three patients diagnosed with cholangiocarcinoma between 2004 and 2016 were treated at the University Hospital of Bonn, Germany. Of these, 96 suffering from unresectable extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma were included. Patients were stratified according to treatment: combination photodynamic therapy and chemotherapy (36 patients), photodynamic therapy alone (34 patients), and chemotherapy alone (26 patients).Results: Combined photodynamic therapy with chemotherapy resulted in significantly longer overall survival than chemotherapy alone (P = 0.022). Median survival was 20 months in the combination group (95% CI: 16.38‐23.62), 15 months in the photodynamic alone group (95% CI: 10.02‐19.98) and 10 months in the chemotherapy alone group (95% CI: 8.45‐11.55). In multivariate analysis, combination therapy and photodynamic therapy alone (HR: 0.41, 95% CI: 0.22‐0.77, P = 0.006), metal stenting, and radiofrequency ablation were independent predictors of longer survival.Conclusions: Combination photodynamic therapy and chemotherapy was well tolerated and resulted in significantly longer survival than chemotherapy alone. Application of photodynamic therapy significantly correlated with longer survival, demonstrating benefit in advanced cholangiocarcinoma. Thus, photodynamic therapy should be considered during therapeutic decision making in advanced cholangiocarcinoma.

Background: This analysis aims at evaluating the impact of multidisciplinary tumor boards on clinical outcome of multiple tumor entities, the effect of the specific number of multidisciplinary tumor boards and potential differences between the tumor entities. Methods: By a matched-pair analysis we compared the response to treatment, overall survival, relapse or disease free survival and progression free survival of patients whose cases were discussed in a tumor board meeting with patients whose cases were not. It was performed with patients registered in the cancer registry of the University of Bonn and diagnosed between 2010 and 2016. After the matching process with a pool of 7262 patients a total of 454 patients with 66 different tumor types were included in this study. Results: First, patients with three or more multidisciplinary tumor board meetings in their history show a significantly better overall survival than patients with no tumor board meeting. Second, response to treatment, relapse free survival and time to progression were not found to be significantly different. Third, there was no significant difference for a specific tumor entity. Conclusion: This study revealed a positive impact of a higher number of multidisciplinary tumor boards on the clinical outcome. Also, our analysis hints towards a positive effect of multidisciplinary tumor boards on overall survival.

Adoptive cellular immunotherapy (ACI) is a promising treatment for a number of cancers. Cytokine-induced killer cells (CIKs) are considered to be major cytotoxic immunologic effector cells. Usually cancer cells are able to suppress antitumor responses by secreting immunosuppressive factors. CIKs have significant antitumor activity and are capable of eradicating tumors with few side effects. They are a very encouraging cell population used against hematological and solid tumors, with an inexpensive expansion protocol which could yield to superior clinical outcome in clinical trials employing adoptive cellular therapy combination. In the last decade, clinical protocols have been modified by enriching lymphocytes with CIK cells. They are a subpopulation of lymphocytes characterized by the expression of CD3+ and CD56+ wich are surface markers common to T lymphocytes and natural killer NK cells. CIK cells are mainly used in two diseases: in hematological patients who suffer relapse after allogeneic transplantation and in patients with hepatic carcinoma after surgical ablation to eliminate residual tumor cells. Dendritic cells DCs could play a pivotal role in enhancing the antitumor efficacy of CIKs.

Introduction: Gastrointestinal (GI) malignancies, such as cholangiocarcinoma, pancreatic carcinoma, and metastatic colorectal carcinoma, have a poor prognosis and effective therapeutic approaches are still challenging. Checkpoint inhibition with PD-1 or PDL-1 antibodies revealed promising results in different tumor entities; however, only few patients with GI tumors can potentially benefit from PD1/PDL1 inhibiting immunotherapy. Further immunotherapeutic strategies for GI malignancies are urgently needed. The aim of this study was to demonstrate that in vitro activation of the immune checkpoint CD40/CD40L can improve DC action towards bile duct, pancreas, and colorectal carcinoma. Methods: Human DC were isolated from buffy coats from healthy donors, pulsed with tumor lysates and then transduced with adenoviruses encoding human CD40L (Ad-hCD40L). Using transwell assays, the effects of (m)CD40L on DC immunoactivation compared to (s)CD40L were analyzed. Surface marker and cytokine/chemokine expression were measured by flow cytometry, ELISA and cytokine arrays. Capacity of Ad-hCD40L-transduced DC to induce tumor-specific effector cells was tested using MTT proliferation assay and cytotoxicity assays. Apoptosis induction on tumor cells after culturing with supernatants of Ad-hCD40L-transduced DC was analyzed by flow cytometry. Results: Ad-hCD40L transduction induced a high expression of (s)CD40L and (m)CD40L on DC and seemed to induce a strong cellular CD40/CD40L interaction among DC, leading to the formation of cell aggregates. Due to the CD40/CD40L interaction, a significant upregulation of DC maturation markers and a Th1-shift on cytokines/chemokines in the supernatant of DC were achieved. Interestingly, a pure Th1-shift was only achieved, when a cellular CD40/CD40L interaction among DC took place. (s)CD40L induced almost no upregulation of maturation markers and rather resulted in a Th2-cytokine expression, such as IL-10. Correspondingly, (m)CD40L-expressing DC led to significant proliferation and stimulation of tumor-specific effector cells with increased cytotoxicity towards pancreatic, bile duct and colorectal tumor cells. Supernatants of Ad-hCD40L-transduced DC could also induce apoptosis in the different tumor cells in vitro. Conclusion: Stimulation of the immune checkpoint CD40L/CD40 by endogenous expression of (m)CD40L provokes a cellular interaction, which increases the immunomodulatory capacity of DC. A Th1 cytokine/chemokine expression is induced, leading to a significant proliferation and enabling cytotoxicity of effector cells towards human bile duct, pancreatic and colorectal tumor cells. The present data point to the promising approach for DC-based immunotherapy of gastrointestinal malignances by activating the CD40/CD40L immune checkpoint.

Prognosis of patients with advanced extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (eCCA) is poor. The current standard first-line treatment is systemic chemotherapy (CT) with gemcitabine and a platinum derivate. Additionally, endobiliary radiofrequency ablation (eRFA) can be applied to treat biliary obstructions. This study aimed to evaluate the additional benefit of scheduled regular eRFA in a real-life patient cohort with advanced extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma under standard systemic CT. All patients with irresectable eCCA treated at University Hospital Bonn between 2010 and 2020 were eligible for inclusion. Patients were stratified according to treatment: standard CT (n = 26) vs. combination of eRFA with standard CT (n = 40). Overall survival (OS), progression free survival (PFS), feasibility and toxicity were retrospectively analyzed using univariate and multivariate approaches. Combined eRFA and CT resulted in significantly longer median OS (17.3 vs. 8.6 months, p = 0.004) and PFS (12.9 vs. 5.7 months, p = 0.045) compared to the CT only group. While groups did not differ regarding age, sex, tumor stage and chemotherapy treatment regimen, mean MELD was even higher (10.1 vs. 6.7, p = 0.015) in the eRFA + CT group. The survival benefit of concomitant eRFA was more evident in the subgroup with locally advanced tumors. Severe hematological toxicities (CTCAE grades 3 – 5) did not differ significantly between the groups. However, therapy-related cholangitis occurred more often in the combined treatment group (p = 0.031). Combination of eRFA and systemic CT was feasible, well-tolerated and could significantly prolong survival compared to standard CT alone. Thus, eRFA should be considered during therapeutic decision making in advanced eCCA.

In 2019, the FLOT4 protocol was established as the new standard for perioperative therapy in patients with locally advanced gastroesophageal and gastric cancer. Whether this protocol is beneficial in a real‐world setting remains a question with limited answers to date. In our study, a large cohort of unselected patients treated with FLOT4 was analyzed and compared to protocols based on 5‐FU/platinum derivative. This retrospective analysis included patients with locally advanced gastroesophageal and gastric cancer treated with perioperative FLOT or 5‐FU/platinum derivative at University Hospital, Bonn between 2010 and 2022 in a curative setting (n = 99). Overall survival, disease‐free survival, therapy response and therapy complications were analyzed. Patients treated with FLOT showed a statistically significant longer median overall survival of 57.8 vs 28.9 months (HR: 0.554, 95% CI: 0.317‐0.969, P = .036). Moreover, pathological tumor regression (pTR) was significantly higher in the FLOT group compared to the 5‐FU/platinum group (P = .001). Subgroup analysis showed a favorable survival benefit for the FLOT vs 5‐FU/platinum derivate in patients with AEG and non‐signet cell carcinoma. Overall, FLOT was tolerated well but CTCAE ≥3 grade neutropenia and diarrhea occurred more often within the FLOT group. Similar to the prospective phase II/III trials, FLOT4 was the best protocol for patients with locally advanced gastroesophageal and gastric cancer as perioperative therapy in terms of overall survival and pathological response rate compared to 5‐FU/platinum derivative protocols. Interestingly, patients with gastroesophageal cancer benefitted more from this therapy. In contrast, patients with signet ring cells appear not to benefit from addition of docetaxel.