M. Esther Fárez-Vidal

Dr. M. Esther Fárez-Vidal


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

23Years (2004-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
28 September 2010 in International Journal of Cancer
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ASAbel Sanchez‐Palencia
Abel Sanchez‐Palencia
MGMercedes Gomez‐Morales
Mercedes Gomez‐Morales
JGJose Antonio Gomez‐Capilla
Jose Antonio Gomez‐Capilla
VPVicente Pedraza
Vicente Pedraza
LBLaura Boyero
Laura Boyero
MFM. Esther Fárez-Vidal
M. Esther Fárez-Vidal
The development of reliable gene expression profiling technology is having an increasing impact on our understanding of lung cancer biology. Our study aimed to determine any correlation between the phenotypic heterogeneity and genetic diversity of lung cancer. Microarray analysis was performed on a set of 46 tumor samples and 45 paired nontumor samples of nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) samples to establish gene signatures in primary adenocarcinomas and squamous‐cell carcinomas, determine differentially expressed gene sequences at different stages of the disease and identify sequences with biological significance for tumor progression. After the microarray analysis, the expression level of 92 selected genes was validated by qPCR and the robust Bonferroni test in an independent set of 70 samples composed of 48 tumor samples and 22 nontumor samples. Gene sequences were differentially expressed as a function of tumor type, stage and differentiation grade. High upregulation was observed for KRT15 and PKP1, which may be good markers to distinguish squamous‐cell carcinoma samples. High downregulation was observed for DSG3 in stage IA adenocarcinomas.

22 December 2009 in Cancer
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
VPVincente Pedraza
Vincente Pedraza
JGJose A. Gomez‐Capilla
Jose A. Gomez‐Capilla
GEGeorgia Escaramis
Georgia Escaramis
CGCarolina Gomez-Llorente
Carolina Gomez-Llorente
PTPablo Torné
Pablo Torné
MFM. Esther Fárez-Vidal
M. Esther Fárez-Vidal
BACKGROUND: The development of reliable gene expression profiling technology is having an increasing impact on the understanding of breast cancer biology.METHODS: In this study, microarray analysis was performed to establish gene signatures for different breast cancer phenotypes, to determine differentially expressed gene sequences at different stages of the disease, and to identify sequences with biologic significance for tumor progression. Samples were taken from patients before their treatment. After microarray analysis, the expression level of 153 selected genes was studied by real‐time quantitative polymerase chain reaction analysis.RESULTS: Several gene sequences were expressed differentially in tumor samples versus control samples and also were associated with different breast cancer phenotypes, estrogen receptor status, tumor histology, and grade of tumor differentiation. In lymph node‐negative tumors were identified a set of genes related to tumor differentiation grade.CONCLUSIONS: Several differentially expressed gene sequences were identified at different stages of breast cancer. Cancer 2010. © 2010 American Cancer Society.

10 March 2013 in Histopathology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MGMercedes Gómez‐Morales
Mercedes Gómez‐Morales
MCMiguel Cámara‐Pulido
Miguel Cámara‐Pulido
MMMaría Teresa Miranda‐León
María Teresa Miranda‐León
ASAbel Sánchez‐Palencia
Abel Sánchez‐Palencia
LBLaura Boyero
Laura Boyero
MFM. Esther Fárez-Vidal
M. Esther Fárez-Vidal

10 December 2019 in Oncogene
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JMJoel Martin-Padron
Joel Martin-Padron
LBLaura Boyero
Laura Boyero
MRMaria Isabel Rodriguez
Maria Isabel Rodriguez
ÁAÁlvaro Andrades
Álvaro Andrades
IDInés Díaz-Cano
Inés Díaz-Cano
PMPedro P. Medina
Pedro P. Medina

26 September 2016 in Oncotarget
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MVMaría del Mar Valenzuela-Membrives
María del Mar Valenzuela-Membrives
FPFrancisco Perea-García
Francisco Perea-García
ASAbel Sanchez-Palencia
Abel Sanchez-Palencia
FRFrancisco Ruiz-Cabello
Francisco Ruiz-Cabello
MGMercedes Gómez-Morales
Mercedes Gómez-Morales
MFM. Esther Fárez-Vidal
M. Esther Fárez-Vidal
Progressive changes in composition of lymphocytes in lung tissues from patients with non-small-cell lung cancer

6 December 2019 in Upsala Journal of Medical Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
IGInmaculada Galindo
Inmaculada Galindo
MGMercedes Gómez-Morales
Mercedes Gómez-Morales
IDInés Díaz-Cano
Inés Díaz-Cano
ÁAÁlvaro Andrades
Álvaro Andrades
MCMercedes Caba-Molina
Mercedes Caba-Molina
MFM. Esther Fárez-Vidal
M. Esther Fárez-Vidal
Background: An antibody panel is needed to definitively differentiate between adenocarcinoma (AC) and squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) in order to meet more stringent requirements for the histologic classification of lung cancers. Staining of desmosomal plaque-related proteins may be useful in the diagnosis of lung SCC. Materials and methods: We compared the usefulness of six conventional (CK5/6, p40, p63, CK7, TTF1, and Napsin A) and three novel (PKP1, KRT15, and DSG3) markers to distinguish between lung SCC and AC in 85 small biopsy specimens (41 ACs and 44 SCCs). Correlations were examined between expression of the markers and patients’ histologic and clinical data. Results: The specificity for SCC of membrane staining for PKP1, KRT15, and DSG3 was 97.4%, 94.6%, and 100%, respectively, and it was 100% when the markers were used together and in combination with the conventional markers (AUCs of 0.7619 for Panel 1 SCC, 0.7375 for Panel 2 SCC, 0.8552 for Panel 1 AC, and 0.8088 for Panel 2 AC). In a stepwise multivariate logistic regression model, the combination of CK5/6, p63, and PKP1 in membrane was the optimal panel to differentiate between SCC and AC, with a percentage correct classification of 96.2% overall (94.6% of ACs and 97.6% of SCCs). PKP1 and DSG3 are related to the prognosis. Conclusions: PKP1, KRT15, and DSG3 are highly specific for SCC, but they were more useful to differentiate between SCC and AC when used together and in combination with conventional markers. PKP1 and DSG3 expressions may have prognostic value.