Erik H. Saenger

Prof. Dr. Erik H. Saenger

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

29Years (1998-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 January 2013 in Computers & Geosciences
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
HAHeiko Andrä
Heiko Andrä
NCNicolas Combaret
Nicolas Combaret
JDJack Dvorkin
Jack Dvorkin
EGErik Glatt
Erik Glatt
JHJunehee Han
Junehee Han
XZXin Zhan
Xin Zhan

1 January 2013 in Computers & Geosciences
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
HAHeiko Andrä
Heiko Andrä
NCNicolas Combaret
Nicolas Combaret
JDJack Dvorkin
Jack Dvorkin
EGErik Glatt
Erik Glatt
JHJunehee Han
Junehee Han
XZXin Zhan
Xin Zhan

1 January 2000 in Wave Motion
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ESErik H. Saenger
Erik H. Saenger
NGNorbert Gold
Norbert Gold
SSSerge A. Shapiro
Serge A. Shapiro

1 January 2004 in Geophysics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ESErik H. Saenger
Erik H. Saenger
TBThomas Bohlen
Thomas Bohlen
We describe the application of the rotated staggered-grid (RSG) finite-difference technique to the wave equations for anisotropic and viscoelastic media. The RSG uses rotated finite-difference operators, leading to a distribution of modeling parameters in an elementary cell where all components of one physical property are located only at one single position. This can be advantageous for modeling wave propagation in anisotropic media or complex media, including high-contrast discontinuities, because no averaging of elastic moduli is needed. The RSG can be applied both to displacement-stress and to velocity-stress finite-difference (FD) schemes, whereby the latter are commonly used to model viscoelastic wave propagation. With a von Neumann-style anlysis, we estimate the dispersion error of the RSG scheme in general anisotropic media. In three different simulation examples, all based on previously published problems, we demonstrate the application and the accuracy of the proposed numerical approach.

1 January 2006 in Geophysics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
TBThomas Bohlen
Thomas Bohlen
ESErik H. Saenger
Erik H. Saenger
Heterogeneous finite-difference (FD) modeling assumes that the boundary conditions of the elastic wavefield between material discontinuities are implicitly fulfilled by the distribution of the elastic parameters on the numerical grid. It is widely applied to weak elastic contrasts between geologic formations inside the earth. We test the accuracy at the free surface of the earth. The accuracy for modeling Rayleigh waves using the conventional standard staggered-grid (SSG) and the rotated staggered grid (RSG) is investigated. The accuracy tests reveal that one cannot rely on conventional numerical dispersion discretization criteria. A higher sampling is necessary to obtain acceptable accuracy. In the case of planar free surfaces aligned with the grid, 15 to 30 grid points per minimum wavelength of the Rayleigh wave are required. The widely used explicit boundary condition, the so-called image method, produces similar accuracy and requires approximately half the sampling of the wavefield compared to heterogeneous free-surface modeling. For a free-surface not aligned with the grid (surface topography), the error increases significantly and varies with the dip angle of the interface. For an irregular interface, the RSG scheme is more accurate than the SSG scheme. The RSG scheme, however, requires 60 grid points per minimum wavelength to achieve good accuracy for all dip angles. The high computation requirements for 3D simulations on such fine grids limit the application of heterogenous modeling in the presence of complex surface topography.

10 April 2012 in Geophysical Journal International
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CMClaudio Madonna
Claudio Madonna
Bjarne AlmqvistBjarne Almqvist
Bjarne Almqvist
ESErik H. Saenger
Erik H. Saenger
Summary. Digital rock physics combines modern microscopic imaging with advanced numerical simulations to analyse the physical properties of rocks. Elastic-wave