Objectives: To evaluate the long-term efficacy of a second generation of vaginal laser treatment, the vaginal erbium laser, as a non-ablative photothermal therapy for the management of genitourinary syndrome of menopause. Methods: The study was performed using an erbium laser crystal yttrium-aluminum-garnet (XS Fotona Smooth™, Fotona, Ljubljana, Slovenia) with a wavelength of 2940 nm. Postmenopausal women (n = 205) were treated with three laser applications at 30-day intervals. Symptoms were assessed before and after treatment throughout 24 months, using the subjective visual analog scale (VAS) and the objective vaginal health index score (VHIS). In addition, postmenopausal women suffering from stress urinary incontinence were evaluated with the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Urinary Incontinence Short Form (ICIQ-UI SF). Results: Vaginal erbium laser treatment induced a significant (p < 0.01) decrease in VAS for both vaginal dryness and dyspareunia, as well an increase in VHIS (p < 0.01) up to the 12th month after the last laser treatment. The values returned to levels similar to the baseline after 18 and 24 months. In addition, vaginal erbium laser treatment improved mild-moderate stress urinary incontinence in 114 postmenopausal women. Less than 3% of patients discontinued treatment due to adverse events. Conclusions: These results suggest that vaginal erbium laser may be effective and safe for the treatment of genitourinary syndrome of menopause.

Nowadays, postmenopausal women are largely undertreated. Analysis of conflicting results among different studies suggests that hormone replacement therapy (HRT) can prevent osteoporosis and cardiovascular disease in symptomatic, early postmenopausal women. In fact, climacteric symptoms are related to an increased risk of chronic conditions, including hypertension and cardiovascular disease. Different scientific societies have pointed out that patient selection, timing of initiation, and the choice of the type and dose of HRT used are the major determinants of the ultimate effect of HRT on women’s health and quality of life in selected women. HRT may prevent chronic conditions when started in symptomatic women before the age of 60 years or within 10 years of the onset of the menopause, taking into consideration the characteristics and risk profiles of each given woman. The bulk of scientific evidence from preclinical, clinical, epidemiological, and also randomized studies indicates that wisely selected HRT is generally useful and rarely dangerous. Following simple and well-established rules, HRT benefits outweigh all of the possible risks. Progestogen choice can make the difference in terms of cardiovascular disease benefits.

Premature ovarian insufficiency (POI) is probably one of the most devastating diagnoses for women of reproductive age. The major implications for fertility, climacteric symptoms, and quality of life, the great impact of long-term consequences such as bone loss and cardiovascular health, and the lack of a coherent and shared clinical approach make the choice for the right hormonal therapy challenging. In this review we propose an integrated and patient-based hormonal approach for women with POI, from puberty to late reproductive age.

Around 80% of women suffer menopause-related symptoms that affect their daily activities and quality of life. Menopausal hormone therapy (MHT) has proven to be beneficial in relieving these symptoms. Nevertheless, only 20/30% of symptomatic women seek treatment. This has resulted in neglect of a generation of healthcare professionals' (HCPs) education in menopausal medicine and a reduction in the prescription of MHT in menopausal women for over two decades. The aim of this article was to identify the main barriers that HCPs face for prescribing MHT and menopausal women for using it. Six European experts in menopause agreed on the profiles of women that benefit from MHT and proposed strategies to break down these barriers. The most important barrier for HCPs was deficient knowledge of the true evidence-based information, with inadequate training regarding the efficacy and safety of personalized MHT and the real benefit/risk ratio in the treatment of symptomatic women. For patients, fear of developing breast cancer was identified as the single most important barrier. Breaking down barriers is possible, by providing appropriate training and education to HCPs and women. This should result in fully informed, evidence based, shared treatment decisions by women and their physicians.