In human cells, one-third of all polypeptides enter the secretory pathway at the endoplasmic reticulum (ER). The specificity and efficiency of this process are guaranteed by targeting of mRNAs and/or polypeptides to the ER membrane. Cytosolic SRP and its receptor in the ER membrane facilitate the cotranslational targeting of most ribosome-nascent precursor polypeptide chain (RNC) complexes together with the respective mRNAs to the Sec61 complex in the ER membrane. Alternatively, fully synthesized precursor polypeptides are targeted to the ER membrane post-translationally by either the TRC, SND, or PEX19/3 pathway. Furthermore, there is targeting of mRNAs to the ER membrane, which does not involve SRP but involves mRNA- or RNC-binding proteins on the ER surface, such as RRBP1 or KTN1. Traditionally, the targeting reactions were studied in cell-free or cellular assays, which focus on a single precursor polypeptide and allow the conclusion of whether a certain precursor can use a certain pathway. Recently, cellular approaches such as proximity-based ribosome profiling or quantitative proteomics were employed to address the question of which precursors use certain pathways under physiological conditions. Here, we combined siRNA-mediated depletion of putative mRNA receptors in HeLa cells with label-free quantitative proteomics and differential protein abundance analysis to characterize RRBP1- or KTN1-involving precursors and to identify possible genetic interactions between the various targeting pathways. Furthermore, we discuss the possible implications on the so-called TIGER domains and critically discuss the pros and cons of this experimental approach.

The human Sec61 complex is a widely distributed and abundant molecular machine. It resides in the membrane of the endoplasmic reticulum to channel two types of cargo: protein substrates and calcium ions. The SEC61A1 gene encodes for the pore-forming Sec61α subunit of the Sec61 complex. Despite their ubiquitous expression, the idiopathic SEC61A1 missense mutations p.V67G and p.T185A trigger a localized disease pattern diagnosed as autosomal dominant tubulointerstitial kidney disease (ADTKD–SEC61A1). Using cellular disease models for ADTKD–SEC61A1, we identified an impaired protein transport of the renal secretory protein renin and a reduced abundance of regulatory calcium transporters, including SERCA2. Treatment with the molecular chaperone phenylbutyrate reversed the defective protein transport of renin and the imbalanced calcium homeostasis. Signal peptide substitution experiments pointed at targeting sequences as the cause for the substrate-specific impairment of protein transport in the presence of the V67G or T185A mutations. Similarly, dominant mutations in the signal peptide of renin also cause ADTKD and point to impaired transport of this renal hormone as important pathogenic feature for ADTKD–SEC61A1 patients as well.

Here, we review recent molecular modelling and simulation studies of the Sec translocon, the primary component/channel of protein translocation into the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) and bacterial periplasm, respectively. Our focus is placed on the eukaryotic Sec61, but we also mention modelling studies on prokaryotic SecY since both systems operate in related ways. Cryo-EM structures are now available for different conformational states of the Sec61 complex, ranging from the idle or closed state over an inhibited state with the inhibitor mycolactone bound near the lateral gate, up to a translocating state with bound substrate peptide in the translocation pore. For all these states, computational studies have addressed the conformational dynamics of the translocon with respect to the pore ring, the plug region, and the lateral gate. Also, molecular simulations are addressing mechanistic issues of insertion into the ER membrane vs. translocation into the ER, how signal-peptides are recognised at all in the translocation pore, and how accessory proteins affect the Sec61 conformation in the co- and post-translational pathways.

The plant-derived macrocyclic resin glycoside ipomoeassin F (Ipom-F) binds to Sec61α and significantly disrupts multiple aspects of Sec61-mediated protein biogenesis at the endoplasmic reticulum, ultimately leading to cell death. However, extensive assessment of Ipom-F as a molecular tool and a therapeutic lead is hampered by its limited production scale, largely caused by intramolecular assembly of the macrocyclic ring. Here, using in vitro and/or in cellula biological assays to explore the first series of ring-opened analogues for the ipomoeassins, and indeed all resin glycosides, we provide clear evidence that macrocyclic integrity is not required for the cytotoxic inhibition of Sec61-dependent protein translocation by Ipom-F. Furthermore, our modeling suggests that open-chain analogues of Ipom-F can interact with multiple sites on the Sec61α subunit, most likely located at a previously identified binding site for mycolactone and/or the so-called lateral gate. Subsequent in silico-aided design led to the discovery of the stereochemically simplified analogue 3 as a potent, alternative lead compound that could be synthesized much more efficiently than Ipom-F and will accelerate future ipomoeassin research in chemical biology and drug discovery. Our work may also inspire further exploration of ring-opened analogues of other resin glycosides.

In eukaryotes, protein secretion begins with protein translocation through the universally conserved Sec61 channel into the endoplasmic reticulum (ER). Its β-subunit, Sbh1 in yeast, enhances ER import of proteins with specific suboptimal signal peptides by an unknown mechanism. The Sbh1 cytosolic N-terminus consists of an intrinsically disordered, non-conserved region (IDR) that has never been visualized in active channel structures, but is close to the translocating polypeptide in the cytosolic channel vestibule. The Sbh1/Sec61β N-terminal IDR is followed by structured 15 amino acids and its C-terminal transmembrane helix, both of which are conserved. We show here that the proline and adjacent conserved residues at the Sbh1 cytosolic/transmembrane domain interface form a hinge that positions the Sbh1 cytosolic domain across the channel vestibule and orients it with respect to the lateral gate. This orientation is critical for Sbh1-dependent protein insertion into the channel. Sbh1-dependence of Sec61 channel insertion is a function of the signal peptide of the respective secretory protein. By chemical crosslinking of purified cytosolic domains of Sbh1 and its paralog Sbh2 to synthetic signal peptides derived from their respective client proteins, we show that the cytosolic domains of Sbh1 and Sbh2 contain specific signal peptide binding sites. The position of the crosslinked residues suggests that signal peptide binding is mediated by the IDRs. We conclude that Sec61β homologs directly recognize signal peptides of their substrates and guide them into the Sec61 channel; they thus control entry of specific proteins into the secretory pathway.