Xiaohong Sui

Prof. Dr. Xiaohong Sui


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

15Years (2012-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
24 September 2015 in Journal of Neural Engineering
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
GCGuohong Chai
Guohong Chai
XSXiaohong Sui
Xiaohong Sui
SLSi Li
Si Li
LHLongwen He
Longwen He
NLNing Lan
Ning Lan
The goal of this study is to characterize the phenomenon of evoked tactile sensation (ETS) on the stump skin of forearm amputees using transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS). We identified the projected finger map (PFM) of ETS on the stump skin in 11 forearm amputees, and compared perceptual attributes of the ETS in nine forearm amputees and eight able-bodied subjects using TENS. The profile of perceptual thresholds at the most sensitive points (MSPs) in each finger-projected area was obtained by modulating current amplitude, pulse width, and frequency of the biphasic, rectangular current stimulus. The long-term stability of the PFM and the perceptual threshold of the ETS were monitored in five forearm amputees for a period of 11 months. Five finger-specific projection areas can be independently identified on the stump skin of forearm amputees with a relatively long residual stump length. The shape of the PFM was progressively similar to that of the hand with more distal amputation. Similar sensory modalities of touch, pressure, buzz, vibration, and numb below pain sensation could be evoked both in the PFM of the stump skin of amputees and in the normal skin of able-bodied subjects. Sensory thresholds in the normal skin of able-bodied subjects were generally lower than those in the stump skin of forearm amputees, however, both were linearly modulated by current amplitude and pulse width. The variation of the MSPs in the PFM was confined to a small elliptical area with 95% confidence. The perceptual thresholds of thumb-projected areas were found to vary less than 0.99 × 10(-2) mA cm(-2). The stable PFM and sensory thresholds of ETS are desirable for a non-invasive neural interface that can feed back finger-specific tactile information from the prosthetic hand to forearm amputees.

1 August 2019 in Biomedical Signal Processing and Control
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Dinesh K. KumarDinesh K. Kumar
Dinesh K. Kumar
Beth JelfsBeth Jelfs
Beth Jelfs
XSXiaohong Sui
Xiaohong Sui
Sridhar ArjunanSridhar Arjunan
Sridhar Arjunan

6 October 2023 in Frontiers in Neuroscience
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
HTHaoyang Tian
Haoyang Tian
HZHaozheng Zhu
Haozheng Zhu
CGChenhao Gao
Chenhao Gao
MSMingxia Shi
Mingxia Shi
DYDekun Yang
Dekun Yang
XSXiaohong Sui
Xiaohong Sui
During the past decades, the potential effects of extremely low-frequency electromagnetic fields (ELF-EMFs) on human health have gained great interest all around the world. Though the International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection recommended a 100 μT, and then a 200 μT magnetic field limit, the long-term effects of ELF-EMFs on organisms and systems need to be further investigated. It was reported that both electrotherapy and possible effects on human health could be induced under ELF-EM radiation with varied EM frequencies and fields. This present article intends to systematically review the in vivo experimental outcome and the corresponding mechanisms to shed some light on the safety considerations of ELF-EMFs. This will further advance the subsequent application of electrotherapy in human health.

29 May 2013 in Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
XJXia Jiang
Xia Jiang
XSXiaohong Sui
Xiaohong Sui
YLYiliang Lu
Yiliang Lu
YYYan Yan
Yan Yan
CZChuanqing Zhou
Chuanqing Zhou
XCXinyu Chai
Xinyu Chai
Background: Epiretinal implants based on microelectro-mechanical system (MEMS) technology with a polyimide (PI) material are being proposed for application. Many kinds of non-photosensitive PIs have good biocompatibility and stability as typical MEMS materials for implantable electrodes. However, the effects of MEMS microfabrication, sterilization and implantation using a photosensitive polyimide (PSPI) microelectrode array for epiretinal electrical stimulation has not been extensively examined. Methods: A novel PSPI (Durimide 7510) microelectrode array for epiretinal electrical stimulation was designed, fabricated based on MEMS processing and microfabrication techniques. The biocompatibility of our new microelectrode was tested in vitro using an MTT assay and direct contact tests between the microelectrode surface and cells. Electrochemical impedance characteristics were tested based on a three-electrode testing method. The reliability and stability was evaluated by a chronic implantation of a non-functional array within the rabbit eye. Histological examination and SEM were performed to monitor possible damage of the retina and microelectrodes. Electrically evoked potentials (EEPs) were recorded during the acute stimulation of the retina. Results: The substrate was made of PSPI and the electrode material was platinum (Pt). The PSPI microelectrode array showed good biocompatibility and appropriate impedance characteristics for epiretinal stimulation. After a 6-month epiretinal implantation in the eyes of rabbits, we found no local retinal toxicity and no mechanical compression caused by the array. The Pt electrodes adhesion to the PSPI remained stable. A response to electrical stimuli was with recording electrodes lying on the visual cortex. Conclusion: We provide a relevant design and fundamental characteristics of a PSPI microelectrode array. Strong evidences on testing indicate that implantation is safe in terms of mechanical pressure and biocompatibility of PSPI microelectrode arrays on the retina. The dual-layer process we used proffers considerable advantages over the more traditional single-layer approach and can accommodate much many electrode sites. This lays the groundwork for a future, high-resolution retinal prosthesis with many more electrode sites based on the flexible PSPI thin film substrate.

30 April 2018 in Frontiers in Neuroscience
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MLMengnan Li
Mengnan Li
DZDingguo Zhang
Dingguo Zhang
YCYao Chen
Yao Chen
XCXinyu Chai
Xinyu Chai
LHLongwen He
Longwen He
XSXiaohong Sui
Xiaohong Sui
Tactile sensory feedback would make a significant contribution to the state-of-the-art prosthetic hands for achieving dexterous manipulation over objects. Phantom finger sensation, also called referred sensation of lost fingers, can be noninvasively evoked by transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) of the phantom finger territories (PFTs) near the stump for upper-limb amputees. As such, intuitive sensations pertaining to lost fingers could be non-invasively generated. However, the encoding of stimulation parameters into tactile sensations that can be intuitively interpreted by the users remains a significant challenge. Further, how discriminative such artificial tactile sensation with TENS of the PFTs is still unknown. In this study, we systematically characterized the tactile discrimination across different phantom fingers on the stump skin by TENS among six subjects. Charge-balanced and biphasic stimulating current pulses were adopted. The pulse amplitude (PA), the pulse frequency (PF) and the pulse width (PW) were modulated to evaluate the detection threshold, perceived touch intensity, and the just-noticeable difference (JND) of the phantom finger sensation. Particularly, the recognition of phantom fingers under simultaneous stimulation was assessed. The psychophysical experiments revealed that subjects could discern fine variations of stimuli with comfortable sensation of phantom fingers including D1 (phantom thumb), D2 (phantom index finger), D3 (Phantom middle finger), and D5 (Phantom pinky finger). With respect to PA, PF, and PW modulations, the detection thresholds across the four phantom fingers were achieved by the method of constant stimuli based on a two-alternative forced-choice (2AFC) paradigm. For each modulation, the perceived intensity, which was indexed by skin indentations on the contralateral intact finger pulp, reinforced gradually with enhancing stimuli within lower-intensity range. Particularly, the curve of the indentation depth vs. PF almost reached a plateau with PF more than 200 Hz. Moreover, the performance of phantom finger recognition deteriorated with the increasing number of phantom fingers under simultaneous TENS. For one, two and four stimulating channels, the corresponding recognition rate of an individual PFT were respective 85.83, 67.67, and 46.44%. The results of the present work would provide direct guidelines regarding the optimization of stimulating strategies to deliver artificial tactile sensation by TENS for clinical applications.

16 May 2017 in Frontiers in Neuroscience
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
KZKaihua Zhu
Kaihua Zhu
LLLiming Li
Liming Li
XWXuyong Wei
Xuyong Wei
XSXiaohong Sui
Xiaohong Sui
Tactile sensory feedback plays an important role in our daily life. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) is widely accepted to produce artificial tactile sensation. To explore the underlying mechanism of tactile sensation under TENS, this paper presented a novel 3D TENS computational model including an active Aβ tactile nerve fiber (TNF) model and a forearm finite element model with the fine-layered skin structure. The conduction velocity vs. fiber diameter and strength-duration relationships in this combined TENS model matched well with experimental data. Based on this validated TENS model, threshold current variation were further investigated under different stimulating electrode sizes with varied fiber diameters. The computational results showed that the threshold current intensity increased with electrode size, and larger nerve fibers were recruited at lower current intensities. These results were comparable to our psychophysical experimental data from six healthy subjects. This novel 3D TENS model would further guide the floorplan of the surface electrodes, and the stimulating paradigms for tactile sensory feedback.