Research productivity is expected of academic faculty, and mentoring can facilitate it. This paper presents a framework for using mentoring to develop researchers in health disciplines.We utilized ...

Many athletes living with and beyond cancer can continue to train and, in some cases, compete during treatment. Following cancer treatment, athletes can return to competitive sport but need to learn to adapt their physical strength and training to the lingering effects of cancer. It is critical for oncology healthcare providers to use the principles of assess, refer and advise to exercise oncology programs that are appropriate for the individual. Managing side effects of treatment is key to being able to train during and immediately following cancer treatment. Keen attention to fatigue is important at any point in the cancer spectrum to avoid overtraining and optimize the effects of training. Resources are introduced for providers to reference and direct patients to information for psychosocial support and instruction. The purpose of this paper is to present exercise considerations during and after cancer treatment for athletic cancer survivors.

Athletes living with and beyond cancer can continue to train and, in some cases, compete during treatment. Following cancer treatment, athletes can return to competitive sport but need to learn to adapt their physical strength and training to lingering effects of cancer. It is critical for oncology healthcare providers to use the principles of assess, refer and advise to exercise oncology programs that are appropriate for the individual. Managing side effects of treatment is key to being able to train during and immediately following cancer treatment. Keen attention to fatigue is important at any point in the cancer spectrum to avoid overtraining and optimize the effects of training.

Background: Exercise is important for the health of people living with and beyond cancer. Yet most cancer survivors do not receive advice or referral to exercise oncology rehabilitation programs. A smartphone delivered exercise oncology app could minimize many of the barriers to exercise that these individuals face. Objective: To develop an exercise oncology application that provides a tailored exercise program (based on exercise history, current physical function, etc.) and adapts to user’s fatigue levels to minimize many of the barriers faced by clinicians, patients and people in underserved areas. Methods: The algorithms in the app were developed based on previous research. The individualized exercise prescription is based on the user’s daily level of fatigue, and if the user is on treatment, type and duration of treatment, and current fitness level. Results: Developed an easy to navigate, read and use app with reminders to exercise and positive feedback for reaching one’s goals. Conclusion: Cancer Exercise is a unique app that provides a tailored exercise oncology program for cancer survivors. Additional research is needed to see how the app may benefit people living in rural and underserved communities.

Cancer-related fatigue (CRF) is prevalent and onerous for cancer survivors. Not all survivors respond equally to interventions, but the characteristics distinguishing responders and non-responders are often unknown. This secondary analysis study compared baseline characteristics for responders (CRF reduction ≥2 points), non-responders, and those lost to follow-up using data from a two-group pre-test/post-test trial of a four-week exercise intervention compared to usual care. Included were 278 adult cancer survivors, with a mean age of 52.2 ± 11.9, 65% (180/278) female, and 90% (250/278) Caucasian. Of these, 77 (28%) were responders, 153 (55%) were non-responders, and 48 (17%) were lost to follow-up. At baseline, participants completed the 6-item Schwartz Cancer Fatigue Scale, with responses from 1 (not at all) to 5 (extremely fatigued) and a total score ranging 6–30. In the intervention group, 35% (49/141) reported decreased fatigue, 24% (34/141) reported increased fatigue, 25% (35/141) had minimal change, and 16% (23/141) were lost to follow-up. In the control group, 20% (28/137) reported decreased fatigue, 39% (53/137) reported increased fatigue, 23% (31/137) had minimal change, and 18% (25/137) were lost to follow-up. Responders in both groups reported higher baseline fatigue than non-responders, with mean differences of 5.2 (95% CI: 3.6–6.8) and 5.4 (95% CI: 3.4–7.3) for intervention and usual care, respectively. Higher baseline fatigue was found in responders compared to non-responders, regardless of group assignment, suggesting that those with a greater fatigue burden may have derived more benefit from exercise for CRF or a regression to the mean effect.

Purpose: Cancer survivors in rural and underserved areas face barriers such as limited access to oncology exercise programs and limited facilities, contributing to health inequities in cancer survivorship. This study explored cancer survivors’ thoughts on exercise and mobile technology for exercising with a mobile application (app) during and after treatment in rural and remote areas. Methods: Three online focus groups were conducted in February 2024 using semi-structured interviews with 12 open-ended questions. Eligible participants were adult cancer survivors or caregivers living in medically underserved areas, English-speaking, consented to being audiotaped, and attended one 60-min group interview. The discussions were transcribed verbatim and analyzed via a content analysis approach with consensus. Results: Fifteen participants attended from four States. None of the participants were advised to exercise; availability of exercise resources depended on geographic location and a cancer-specific exercise app was desired. They understood the benefits of exercise after diagnosis but expressed a need for more guidance during treatment. Geographic location shaped their activities, with most engaging in daily physical tasks rather than structured exercise. Most participants were receptive to using an exercise app to manage fatigue. Suggested key features to exercise with an app included live trainers, exercise checklists, visual benchmarks, and programs tailored to different fitness levels. Conclusions: These results emphasize the need for personalized resources, guidance, and on-demand accessibility to an exercise oncology app. A cancer-specific exercise mobile app will mitigate health inequities for cancer survivors residing in rural and remote areas.