Therapeutic cancer vaccines have become increasingly qualified for use in personalized cancer immunotherapy. A deeper understanding of tumor immunology and novel antigen delivery technologies has assisted in optimizing vaccine design. Therapeutic cancer vaccines aim to establish long-lasting immunological memory against tumor cells, thereby leading to effective tumor regression and minimizing non-specific or adverse events. However, due to several resistance mechanisms, significant challenges remain to be solved in order to achieve these goals. In this review, we describe our current understanding with respect to the use of the antigen repertoire in vaccine platform development. We also summarize various intrinsic and extrinsic resistance mechanisms behind the failure of cancer vaccine development in the past. Finally, we suggest a strategy that combines immune checkpoint inhibitors to enhance the efficacy of cancer vaccines.

Background: Predictive markers for treatment response and survival outcome have not been identified in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) receiving chemoimmunotherapy. We aimed to evaluate whether imaging biomarkers of ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose (¹⁸F-FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) and routinely assessed clinico-laboratory values were associated with clinical outcomes in patients with advanced NSCLC receiving pembrolizumab plus platinum-doublet chemotherapy as a first-line treatment. Methods: We retrospectively enrolled 52 patients with advanced NSCLC who underwent baseline ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT before treatment initiation. PET/CT parameters and clinico-laboratory variables, constituting the prognostic immunotherapy scoring system, were collected. Optimal cut-off values for PET/CT parameters were determined using the maximized log-rank test for progression-free survival (PFS). A multivariate prediction model was developed based on Cox models for PFS, and a scoring system was established based on hazard ratios of the predictive factors. Results: During the median follow-up period of 16.7 months (95% confidence interval: 15.7–17.7 months), 43 (82.7%) and 31 (59.6%) patients experienced disease progression and death, respectively. Objective response was observed in 23 (44.2%) patients. In the multivariate analysis, maximum standardized uptake value, metabolic tumour volume_2.5, total lesion glycolysis_2.5, and bone marrow-to-liver uptake ratio from the PET/CT variables and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) from the clinico-laboratory variables were independently associated with PFS. The scoring system based on these independent predictive variables significantly predicted the treatment response, PFS, and overall survival. Conclusion: PET/CT variables and NLR were useful biomarkers for predicting outcomes of patients with NSCLC receiving pembrolizumab and chemotherapy as a first-line treatment, suggesting their potential as effective markers for combined PD-1 blockade and chemotherapy.

Objectives: Patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) ultimately acquire resistance to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) during treatment. In 5–22% of these patients, resistance is mediated by aberrant mesenchymal epithelial transition factor (MET) gene amplification. Here, we evaluated the emergence of MET amplification after EGFR-TKI treatment failure based on clinical parameters. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 186 patients with advanced EGFR-mutant NSCLC for MET amplification status by in situ hybridization (ISH) assay after EGFR-TKI failure. We collected information including baseline patient characteristics, metastatic locations and generation, line, and progression-free survival (PFS) of EGFR-TKI used before MET evaluation. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was conducted to evaluate associations between MET amplification status and clinical variables. Results: Regarding baseline EGFR mutations, exon 19 deletion was predominant (57.5%), followed by L858R mutation (37.1%). The proportions of MET ISH assays performed after first/second-generation and third-generation TKI failure were 66.7% and 33.1%, respectively. The median PFS for the most recent EGFR-TKI treatment was shorter in MET amplification-positive patients than in MET amplification-negative patients (median PFS 7.0 vs. 10.4 months, p = 0.004). Multivariate logistic regression demonstrated that a history of smoking, short PFS on the most recent TKI, and less intracranial progression were associated with a high probability of MET amplification (all p < 0.05). Conclusions: Our results demonstrated the distinct clinical characteristics of patients with MET amplification-positive NSCLC after EGFR-TKI therapy. Our clinical prediction can aid physicians in selecting patients eligible for MET amplification screening and therapeutic targeting.

Background: In phase I studies, poziotinib has shown meaningful efficacy against various types of cancers. This phase 2 study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of poziotinib in recurrent and/or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (R/M‐HNSCC).Methods: Overall, 49 patients were enrolled (median age, 62 years; age range, 21–78 years). Patients received a median of two prior treatments including chemotherapy and others and received 12 mg poziotinib orally once daily as part of a 28‐day cycle. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR), and the secondary endpoints were progression‐free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Targeted capture sequencing was performed using available tissues to identify translational biomarkers related to clinical response.Results: ORR was 22.4%, median PFS was 4.0 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.8–6.2 months), and median OS was 7.6 months (95% CI, 4.4–10.8 months). The most common treatment‐related adverse events were acneiform rash (85%) and mucositis (77%). A grade 3 or higher adverse event was acneiform rash (3%). Targeted capture sequencing was performed in 30 tissue samples. TP53 and PIK3CA were the most frequently mutated genes (43%), followed by CCND1 (33%) and EGFR (30%). Mutations in ERBB2, ERBB3, and ERBB4, which are HER family genes, were observed in 17%, 13%, and 10% samples, respectively. There was no difference in the frequency of somatic mutations in the HER family genes between the clinically benefitted and non‐benefitted groups.Conclusion: Compared to other pan‐HER inhibitors, poziotinib showed clinically meaningful efficacy in heavily treated R/M‐HNSCC.Clinical trial registration number.: NCT02216916.

Hong M, et al. J Gastric Cancer. 2023 Oct;23(4):574-583. https://doi.org/10.5230/jgc.2023.23.e36