Tasneem Arsiwala

Ms. Tasneem Arsiwala

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

8Years (2019-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 August 2019 in Trends in Cancer
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SSSamuel A. Sprowls
Samuel A. Sprowls
Tasneem ArsiwalaTasneem Arsiwala
Tasneem Arsiwala
JBJacob Bumgarner
Jacob Bumgarner
NSNeal Shah
Neal Shah
SLSundus S. Lateef
Sundus S. Lateef
Paul LockmanPaul Lockman
Paul Lockman

1 June 2020 in Translational Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
CBChristopher Butler
Christopher Butler
SSSamuel Sprowls
Samuel Sprowls
GSGabor Szalai
Gabor Szalai
Tasneem ArsiwalaTasneem Arsiwala
Tasneem Arsiwala
PSPushkar Saralkar
Pushkar Saralkar
Tuoen LiuTuoen Liu
Tuoen Liu
Breast cancer patients presenting with symptomatic brain metastases have poor prognosis, and current chemotherapeutic agents are largely ineffective. In this study, we evaluated the hypomethylating agent azacitidine (AZA) for its potential as a novel therapeutic in preclinical models of brain metastasis of breast cancer. We used the parental triple-negative breast cancer MDA-MB-231 (231) cells and their brain colonizing counterpart (231Br) to ascertain phenotypic differences in response to AZA. We observed that 231Br cells have higher metastatic potential compared to 231 cells. With regard to therapeutic value, the AZA IC50 value in 231Br cells is significantly lower than that in parental cells (P < .01). AZA treatment increased apoptosis and inhibited the Wnt signaling transduction pathway, angiogenesis, and cell metastatic capacity to a significantly higher extent in the 231Br line. AZA treatment in mice with experimental brain metastases significantly reduced tumor burden (P = .0112) and increased survival (P = .0026) compared to vehicle. Lastly, we observed a decreased expression of keratin 18 (an epithelial maker) in 231Br cells due to hypermethylation, elucidating a potential mechanism of action of AZA in treating brain metastases from breast cancer.

1 March 2020 in International Journal of Pharmaceutics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PSPushkar Saralkar
Pushkar Saralkar
Tasneem ArsiwalaTasneem Arsiwala
Tasneem Arsiwala
WGWerner J Geldenhuys
Werner J Geldenhuys

12 May 2021 in Pharmaceutical Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
PSPushkar Saralkar
Pushkar Saralkar
AMAlexander Mdzinarishvili
Alexander Mdzinarishvili
Tasneem ArsiwalaTasneem Arsiwala
Tasneem Arsiwala
YLYoon-Kwang Lee
Yoon-Kwang Lee
PSPatrick Sullivan
Patrick Sullivan
WGWerner J Geldenhuys
Werner J Geldenhuys
Purpose Therapeutic strategies to treat ischemic stroke are limited due to the heterogeneity of cerebral ischemic injury and the mechanisms that contribute to the cell death. Since oxidative stress is one of the primary mechanisms that cause brain injury post-stroke, we hypothesized that therapeutic targets that modulate mitochondrial function could protect against reperfusion-injury after cerebral ischemia, with the focus here on a mitochondrial protein, mitoNEET, that modulates cellular bioenergetics. Method In this study, we evaluated the pharmacology of the mitoNEET ligand NL-1 in an in vivo therapeutic role for NL-1 in a C57Bl/6 murine model of ischemic stroke. Results NL-1 decreased hydrogen peroxide production with an IC50 of 5.95 μM in neuronal cells (N2A). The in vivo activity of NL-1 was evaluated in a murine 1 h transient middle cerebral artery occlusion (t-MCAO) model of ischemic stroke. We found that mice treated with NL-1 (10 mg/kg, i.p.) at time of reperfusion and allowed to recover for 24 h showed a 43% reduction in infarct volume and 68% reduction in edema compared to sham-injured mice. Additionally, we found that when NL-1 was administered 15 min post-t-MCAO, the ischemia volume was reduced by 41%, and stroke-associated edema by 63%. Conclusion As support of our hypothesis, as expected, NL-1 failed to reduce stroke infarct in a permanent photothrombotic occlusion model of stroke. This report demonstrates the potential therapeutic benefits of using mitoNEET ligands like NL-1 as novel mitoceuticals for treating reperfusion-injury with cerebral stroke.

8 January 2025 in Pharmaceutics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Tasneem ArsiwalaTasneem Arsiwala
Tasneem Arsiwala
KBKathryn Elizabeth Blethen
Kathryn Elizabeth Blethen
CWCullen Parker Wolford
Cullen Parker Wolford
GPGeoffrey Pecar
Geoffrey Pecar
DPDhruvi M Panchal
Dhruvi M Panchal
Paul LockmanPaul Lockman
Paul Lockman
Background/Objective: The blood–brain barrier (BBB) is selectively permeable, but it also poses significant challenges for treating CNS diseases. Low-intensity focused ultrasound (LiFUS), paired with microbubbles is a promising, non-invasive technique for transiently opening the BBB, allowing enhanced drug delivery to the central nervous system (CNS). However, the downstream physiological effects following BBB opening, particularly secondary responses, are not well understood. This study aimed to characterize the time-dependent changes in BBB permeability, transporter function, and inflammatory responses in both sonicated and non-sonicated brain tissues following LiFUS treatment. Methods: We employed in situ brain perfusion to assess alterations in BBB integrity and transporter function, as well as multiplex cytokine analysis to quantify the inflammatory response. Results: Our findings show that LiFUS significantly increased vascular volume and glucose uptake, with reduced P-gp function in brain tissues six hours post treatment, indicating biphasic BBB disruption. Additionally, elevated levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines, including TNF-α and IL-6, were observed in both sonicated and non-sonicated regions. A comparative analysis between wild-type and immunodeficient mice revealed distinct patterns of cytokine release, with immunodeficient mice showing lower serum concentrations of IFN-γ and TNF-α, highlighting the potential impact of immune status on the inflammatory response to LiFUS. Conclusions: This study provides new insights into the biphasic nature of LiFUS-induced BBB disruption, emphasizing the importance of understanding the timing and extent of secondary physiological changes.

19 May 2021 in Pharmaceutics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SSSamuel A Sprowls
Samuel A Sprowls
PSPushkar Saralkar
Pushkar Saralkar
Tasneem ArsiwalaTasneem Arsiwala
Tasneem Arsiwala
CAChristopher E. Adkins
Christopher E. Adkins
KBKathryn Elizabeth Blethen
Kathryn Elizabeth Blethen
Paul LockmanPaul Lockman
Paul Lockman
The blood–brain barrier (BBB) limits movement of solutes from the lumen of the brain microvascular capillary system into the parenchyma. The unidirectional transfer constant, Kin, is the rate at which transport across the BBB occurs for individual molecules. Single and multiple uptake experiments are available for the determination of Kin for new drug candidates using both intravenous and in situ protocols. Additionally, the single uptake method can be used to determine Kin in heterogeneous pathophysiological conditions such as stroke, brain cancers, and Alzheimer’s disease. In this review, we briefly cover the anatomy and physiology of the BBB, discuss the impact of efflux transporters on solute uptake, and provide an overview of the single-timepoint method for determination of Kin values. Lastly, we compare preclinical Kin experimental results with human parallels.