A technique of sutureless intrascleral fixation of an intraocular lens (IOL) in an eye that lacks a posterior capsular support has been reported. The advantage of this technique was that the suture-related complications did not develop. However, the long-term complications of a sutureless IOL implantation have not been reported. A 75-years-old man had a sutureless intrascleral fixation (Y-fixation) of an IOL 4 months before our examination. The nasal haptic became exposed and the temporal haptic was seen in the subconjunctiva. The tilted IOL was removed and replaced by a posterior chamber IOL that was sutured to the sclera. At the 6 months examination, the eye was quiet and the IOL was stable. We suggest that the exposure of the nasal haptic of an IOL that was implanted by sutureless intrascleral fixation (Y-fixation) was due to poor surgical technique and/or the erosion of a fragile sclera. Thus, eyes should be carefully and frequently monitored after sutureless intrascleral posterior chamber IOL implantation.

Purpose. To compare the effective fields of the Optos 200Tx® and Clarus 500™, two ultra-widefield ophthalmoscopes, based on their ability to image branches of retinal vessel in the four retinal quadrants. Methods. Ninety retinal images from 90 patients with various eye diseases were studied. All patients had undergone 200° retinal imaging to obtain a single image of Optos (O) and the montage of two images of the Clarus (C). The highest number of traceable vessel branches in the four retinal quadrants was determined by two masked raters. An image was classified as “O > C” when the number of identifiable branch was greater in the Optos than the Clarus, as “O = C” when the number was equal and as “O < C” when the number was fewer in the Optos than the Clarus. Results. The appearance probability of “O > C” was significantly higher at the upper temporal quadrant than “O < C” (p<0.01 for both raters). In contrast, the appearance probability of “O < C” was significantly higher at the lower nasal quadrant than “O > C” (p<0.01 for both raters). There were no significant differences in the appearance probability between “O > C” and “O < C” at the other two retinal quadrants (p>0.50 for both raters). Conclusions. These results demonstrate that the effective field of views was different between the two devices at different retina quadrants. Further studies are needed to clarify possible factors such as artifacts by the eyelashes, differences in the depth of focus, motion of the device, and different locations of the images on the effective field of views.

Epiretinal membrane (ERM) foveoschisis is a recently proposed clinical entity. The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical characteristics and surgical outcomes of eyes with ERM foveoschisis to those of typical ERM. The medical records of all patients with ERM-related disorders examined between 2011 and 2020 were reviewed. ERM foveoschisis was defined by the clinical criteria proposed by an international panel of experts on ERMs. The background factors, clinical characteristics, and surgical outcomes of ERM foveoschisis were compared to those of typical ERM. Forty eyes with ERM foveoschisis were compared to 333 eyes with typical ERM. The percentage of women was significantly higher in the ERM foveoschisis group (92.5%) than in the typical ERM group (48.9%, p < 0.001). The central macular thickness (CMT) was significantly thinner in the ERM foveoschisis group (340 ± 110 μm) than in the typical ERM groups (476 ± 111 μm, p < 0.01). The degree of improvement in the best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) three months after the surgery did not differ between the two groups (p = 0.59). These results suggest that the ERM foveoschisis is more likely to occur in women and that the prognosis after surgery is comparable to typical ERM.

Background: To compare the effectiveness of intravitreal ranibizumab (IVR) and intravitreal aflibercept (IVA) performed with the treat-and-extend (TAE) regimen on eyes with diabetic macular edema (DME). Patients and methods: This is a retrospective study of 125 eyes of 125 treatment-naïve DME patients who received anti-VEGF injections at three consecutive monthly intervals as the loading phase. The changes in the best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central retinal thickness (CRT), diabetic retinopathy severity scale (DRSS), and total injection numbers were compared between the two anti-VEGF agents. Results: Among 125 eyes, 26 eyes completed the treatment with the TAE regimen for 24 months (20.8%). Thirteen eyes of 13 patients (mean age, 70.9 ± 6.0 years) received intravitreal injections of 0.5 mg ranibizumab, and 13 eyes of 13 patients (65.9 ± 8.6 years) received 2 mg aflibercept. No significant differences were detected in the baseline demographics. At 24 months, BCVA was significantly improved in both groups; from 0.31 ± 0.19 to 0.10 ± 0.12 logMAR units for IVR and 0.41 ± 0.19 to 0.16 ± 0.28 logMAR units for IVA (p = 1.29 × 10⁻⁹). CRT was significantly reduced in both groups; 440.9 ± 69.3 to 307.5 ± 66.4 μm for IVR and 473.9 ± 71.5 to 317.8 ± 71.2 μm for IVA (p = 3.55 × 10⁻⁹). No significant differences were detected in the improvements of BCVA, CRT in both groups, and the total injection numbers for 24 months (11.0 ± 1.2 for the IVA group and 12.0 ± 1.0 the IVR group). DRSS was significantly improved in both groups (p = 0.0004 for IVR and p = 0.009 for IVA). Conclusion: No significant differences were detected in the improvements of BCVA or CRT and injection numbers between the IVR and IVA groups treated with the TAE regimen. These results indicate that the results of the treatment with both agents with the TAE regimen were equally effective, but only 20.8% of patients completed 24 months of continuous treatment with the TAE regimen. Synopsis: There are no significant differences regarding effectiveness between the IVR and IVA groups treated with the TAE regimen for DME eyes.

Intraocular inflammations (IOIs) have been reported to occur after intravitreal injections of brolucizumab, and one of their causes has been suggested to be drug-specific features. We evaluated the anterior chamber by the aqueous flare value (AFV) and the retina by flicker electroretinography (ERG) after the initial intravitreal injection of aflibercept (IVA), brolucizumab (IVBr), or faricimab (IVF) for neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD). The AFV and flicker ERGs were determined before, 2 weeks after, and 4 weeks after the injections in 14 eyes of 14 patients for each drug. After the injections, none of the patients had an IOI, but the AFV increased significantly in the IVA and IVF groups. The increase in the IVF group was +4.6 photon count/ms, which was significantly greater than in the other groups, but was not clinically significant. The implicit time was significantly prolonged in the IVBr group but unchanged in the IVA and IVF groups. These results suggest that brolucizumab, administered at high molar doses, may cause transient retinal disturbances that are not detectable by general ophthalmologic examinations but affect the implicit ERG times.