Purpose: The majority of the supply chain sustainability (SCS) literature is based on research perspectives and findings from studies conducted in developed countries. The purpose of this paper is to analyse the current Latin American publications on SCS (2007–2016) to explore whether another perspective exists. Design/methodology/approach: As part of a structured literature review, 123 peer-reviewed articles published in four Latin American databases were scanned. This literature review was combined with a qualitative content analysis using an inductive and deductive approach to move away from top–down approaches and to illuminate the Latin American perspective on SCS. Findings: The analysis of the scientific literature demonstrates that the traditional three pillars of sustainability are not enough to understand the specificities of the region. This review shows that cultural and institutional dimensions enhance the understanding of SCS locally. In addition, three major triggers for SCS in Latin American economies were found: green supply chain management practices, local development and stakeholder engagement. Research limitations/implications: A deeper understanding of the Latin American perspective can support scholars worldwide in developing the field of SCS in relevant directions and in comprehending the specificities of their own countries by infusing cultural and institutional elements into their conceptualisations of SCS. Originality/value: This paper provides an unexplored perspective on SCS because it analyses Latin American publications and presents a mapping of current SCS issues and research gaps that offers insights to guide future research in the field.

Gender diversity (GD) has become an open topic of discussion, with a focus on gender gaps in terms of salary and access to education. There has been little research highlighting the active role women may play in sustainable decision making. This study addresses this gap by considering the case of supply chain management (SCM), a function mostly led by men and where several unsustainable issues prevail. It focuses on determining whether GD has an impact on sustainability-related decisions made in SCM. An exploratory and qualitative approach was taken to look at managerial, operational and hybrid skills and practices. The findings reveal three main opinion groups and show that GD would bring softer skills such as empathy at the managerial level, or more socially responsible supplier selection at the operational level. More GD in SCM would improve social relations, communication, compliance and health and safety issues. This study contributes to filling the gap on the social dimension of sustainability.