Mark A. Reynolds

Prof. Mark A. Reynolds

School of Dentistry, University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

37Years (1990-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 July 1990 in Mechanisms of Ageing and Development
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
CGC.L. Goodrick
C.L. Goodrick
DIDonald K Ingram
Donald K Ingram
Mark A. ReynoldsMark A. Reynolds
Mark A. Reynolds
JFJ.R. Freeman
J.R. Freeman
NCN. Cider
N. Cider
Beginning at either 1.5, 6 or 10 months of age, male mice from the A/J and C57BL/6J strains and their F1 hybrid, B6AF1/J were fed a diet (4.2 kcal/g) either ad libitum every day or in a restricted fashion by ad libitum feeding every other day. Relative to estimates for ad libitum controls, the body weights of the intermittently-fed restricted C57BL/6J and hybrid mice were reduced and mean and maximum life span were incremented when the every-other-day regimen was initiated at 1.5 or 6 months of age. When every-other-day feeding was introduced at 10 months of age, again both these genotypes lost body weight relative to controls; however, mean life span was not significantly affected although maximum life span was increased. Among A/J mice, intermittent feeding did not reduce body weight relative to ad libitum controls when introduced at 1.5 or 10 months of age; however, this treatment did increase mean and maximum life span when begun at 1.5 months, while it decreased mean and maximum life span when begun at 10 months. When restricted feeding was introduced to this genotype at 6 months of age, body weight reduction compared to control values was apparent at some ages, but the treatment had no significant effects on mean or maximum life span. These results illustrate that the effects of particular regimens of dietary restriction on body weight and life span are greatly dependent upon the genotype and age of initiation. Moreover, when examining the relationship of body weight to life span both between and within the various groups, it was clear that the complexity of this relationship made it difficult to predict that lower body weight would induce life span increment.

1 January 2010 in Dental Clinics of North America
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Mark A. ReynoldsMark A. Reynolds
Mark A. Reynolds
MAMary Elizabeth Aichelmann-Reidy
Mary Elizabeth Aichelmann-Reidy
GBGrishondra L. Branch-Mays
Grishondra L. Branch-Mays

1 October 2017 in Dental Clinics of North America
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
KZKe Zhang
Ke Zhang
NZNing Zhang
Ning Zhang
Michael WeirMichael Weir
Michael Weir
Mark A. ReynoldsMark A. Reynolds
Mark A. Reynolds
YBYuxing Bai
Yuxing Bai
HXHockin Xu
Hockin Xu

1 January 2012 in Journal of Periodontal & Implant Science
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JHJI-Young Han
JI-Young Han
Mark A. ReynoldsMark A. Reynolds
Mark A. Reynolds
Han JY, et al. J Periodontal Implant Sci. 2012 Feb;42(1):3-12. http://dx.doi.org/10.5051/jpis.2012.42.1.3

1 November 2016 in Materials
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
NZNing Zhang
Ning Zhang
MARY MELOMARY MELO
MARY MELO
Michael WeirMichael Weir
Michael Weir
Mark A. ReynoldsMark A. Reynolds
Mark A. Reynolds
YBYuxing Bai
Yuxing Bai
HXHockin Xu
Hockin Xu
A long-time drawback of dental composites is that they accumulate more biofilms and plaques than amalgam and glass ionomer restorative materials. It would be highly desirable to develop a new composite with reduced biofilm growth, while avoiding the non-esthetics of amalgam and low strength of glass ionomer. The objectives of this study were to: (1) develop a protein-repellent composite with reduced biofilms matching amalgam and glass ionomer for the first time; and (2) investigate their protein adsorption, biofilms, and mechanical properties. Five materials were tested: A new composite containing 3% of protein-repellent 2-methacryloyloxyethyl phosphorylcholine (MPC); the composite with 0% MPC as control; commercial composite control; dental amalgam; resin-modified glass ionomer (RMGI). A dental plaque microcosm biofilm model with human saliva as inoculum was used to investigate metabolic activity, colony-forming units (CFU), and lactic acid production. Composite with 3% MPC had flexural strength similar to those with 0% MPC and commercial composite control (p > 0.1), and much greater than RMGI (p < 0.05). Composite with 3% MPC had protein adsorption that was only 1/10 that of control composites (p < 0.05). Composite with 3% MPC had biofilm CFU and lactic acid much lower than control composites (p < 0.05). Biofilm growth, metabolic activity and lactic acid on the new composite with 3% MPC were reduced to the low level of amalgam and RMGI (p > 0.1). In conclusion, a new protein-repellent dental resin composite reduced oral biofilm growth and acid production to the low levels of non-esthetic amalgam and RMGI for the first time. The long-held conclusion that dental composites accumulate more biofilms than amalgam and glass ionomer is no longer true. The novel composite is promising to finally overcome the major biofilm-accumulation drawback of dental composites in order to reduce biofilm acids and secondary caries.

1 January 2009 in Nutrition
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Mark A. ReynoldsMark A. Reynolds
Mark A. Reynolds
DDDolphus R. Dawson
Dolphus R. Dawson
KNKaren F. Novak
Karen F. Novak
JEJeffrey L. Ebersole
Jeffrey L. Ebersole
JGJohn C. Gunsolley
John C. Gunsolley
MNM. John Novak
M. John Novak