Cara Agerstrand

Cara Agerstrand


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

11Years (2016-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
26 February 2021 in ASAIO Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JBJenelle Badulak
Jenelle Badulak
MAMarta Velia Antonini
Marta Velia Antonini
CSChristine M Stead
Christine M Stead
LSLara Shekerdemian
Lara Shekerdemian
LRLakshmi Raman
Lakshmi Raman
DBDaniel Brodie
Daniel Brodie
Disclaimer: This is an updated guideline from the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization (ELSO) for the role of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) for patients with severe cardiopulmonary failure due to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). The great majority of COVID-19 patients (>90%) requiring ECMO have been supported using venovenous (V-V) ECMO for acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). While COVID-19 ECMO run duration may be longer than in non-COVID-19 ECMO patients, published mortality appears to be similar between the two groups. However, data collection is ongoing, and there is a signal that overall mortality may be increasing. Conventional selection criteria for COVID-19–related ECMO should be used; however, when resources become more constrained during a pandemic, more stringent contraindications should be implemented. Formation of regional ECMO referral networks may facilitate communication, resource sharing, expedited patient referral, and mobile ECMO retrieval. There are no data to suggest deviation from conventional ECMO device or patient management when applying ECMO for COVID-19 patients. Rarely, children may require ECMO support for COVID-19–related ARDS, myocarditis, or multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C); conventional selection criteria and management practices should be the standard. We strongly encourage participation in data submission to investigate the optimal use of ECMO for COVID-19.

15 September 2023 in American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
DRDarya Rudym
Darya Rudym
TPTai Pham
Tai Pham
CRCraig R. Rackley
Craig R. Rackley
GGGiacomo Grasselli
Giacomo Grasselli
MAMichaela Anderson
Michaela Anderson
DBDaniel Brodie
Daniel Brodie
Rationale: Patients with obesity are at increased risk for developing acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Some centers consider obesity a relative contraindication to receiving extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) support, despite growing implementation of ECMO for ARDS in the general population. Objectives: To investigate the association between obesity and mortality in patients with ARDS receiving ECMO. Methods: In this large, international, multicenter, retrospective cohort study, we evaluated the association of obesity, defined as body mass index ≥ 30 kg/m2, with ICU mortality in patients receiving ECMO for ARDS by performing adjusted multivariable logistic regression and propensity score matching. Measurements and Main Results: Of 790 patients with ARDS receiving ECMO in our study, 320 had obesity. Of those, 24.1% died in the ICU, compared with 35.3% of patients without obesity (P < 0.001). In adjusted models, obesity was associated with lower ICU mortality (odds ratio, 0.63 [95% confidence interval, 0.43–0.93]; P = 0.018). Examined as a continuous variable, higher body mass index was associated with decreased ICU mortality in multivariable regression (odds ratio, 0.97 [95% confidence interval, 0.95–1.00]; P = 0.023). In propensity score matching of 199 patients with obesity to 199 patients without, patients with obesity had a lower probability of ICU death than those without (22.6% vs. 35.2%; P = 0.007). Conclusions: Among patients receiving ECMO for ARDS, those with obesity had lower ICU mortality than patients without obesity in multivariable and propensity score matching analyses. Our findings support the notion that obesity should not be considered a general contraindication to ECMO.

28 December 2020 in ASAIO Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CACara Agerstrand
Cara Agerstrand
RDRichard Dubois
Richard Dubois
KTKoji Takeda
Koji Takeda
NUNir Uriel
Nir Uriel
PLPhilippe Lemaitre
Philippe Lemaitre
DBDaniel Brodie
Daniel Brodie
The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has placed extraordinary strain on global healthcare systems. Use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) for patients with severe respiratory or cardiac failure attributed to COVID-19 has been debated due to uncertain survival benefit and the resources required to safely deliver ECMO support. We retrospectively investigated adult patients supported with ECMO for COVID-19 at our institution during the first 80 days following New York City’s declaration of a state of emergency. The primary objective was to evaluate survival outcomes in patients supported with ECMO for COVID-19 and describe the programmatic adaptations made in response to pandemic-related crisis conditions. Twenty-two patients with COVID-19 were placed on ECMO during the study period. Median age was 52 years and 18 (81.8%) were male. Twenty-one patients (95.4%) had severe ARDS and seven (31.8%) had cardiac failure. Fifteen patients (68.1%) were managed with venovenous ECMO while 7 (31.8%) required arterial support. Twelve patients (54.5%) were transported on ECMO from external institutions. Twelve patients were discharged alive from the hospital (54.5%). Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation was used successfully in patients with respiratory and cardiac failure due to COVID-19. The continued use of ECMO, including ECMO transport, during crisis conditions was possible even at the height of the COVID-19 pandemic.

30 June 2021 in Membranes
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
DFDanielle Feldhaus
Danielle Feldhaus
DBDaniel Brodie
Daniel Brodie
PLPhilippe Lemaitre
Philippe Lemaitre
JSJoshua R. Sonett
Joshua R. Sonett
CACara Agerstrand
Cara Agerstrand
Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) has been used with increasing frequency to support patients with acute respiratory failure, most commonly, and severe forms of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). The marked increase in the global use of ECMO followed the publication of a large randomized trial in 2009 and the experience garnered during the 2009 influenza A (H1N1) pandemic, and has been further supported by the release of a large, randomized clinical trial in 2018, confirming a benefit from using ECMO in patients with severe ARDS. Despite a rapid expansion of ECMO-related publications, optimal management of patients receiving ECMO, in terms of patient selection, ventilator management, anticoagulation, and transfusion strategies, is evolving. Most recently, ECMO is being utilized for an expanding variety of conditions, including for cases of severe pulmonary or cardiac failure from coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). This review evaluates modern evidence for ECMO for respiratory failure and the current challenges in the field.

8 March 2024 in Medizinische Klinik - Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
RGRichard Greendyk
Richard Greendyk
RKRahul Kanade
Rahul Kanade
MPMadhavi Parekh
Madhavi Parekh
DADarryl Abrams
Darryl Abrams
PLPhilippe Lemaitre
Philippe Lemaitre
CACara Agerstrand
Cara Agerstrand

29 June 2026 in Intensive Care Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
QMQuentin Moyon
Quentin Moyon
GHGreet Hermans
Greet Hermans
DADarryl Abrams
Darryl Abrams
CACara Agerstrand
Cara Agerstrand
MAMichaela R. Anderson
Michaela R. Anderson
DBDaniel Brodie
Daniel Brodie