Jacki McEachran

Mrs. Jacki McEachran

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

6Years (2021-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
27 May 2021 in Nutrients
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
VSVanessa S. Sakalidis
Vanessa S. Sakalidis
ARAlethea Rea
Alethea Rea
SPSharon Lisa Perrella
Sharon Lisa Perrella
JMJacki McEachran
Jacki McEachran
GCGrace Collis
Grace Collis
DGDonna Geddes
Donna Geddes
During the COVID-19 pandemic, breastfeeding women have experienced restricted access to support, placing them at increased risk of mental health concerns and limited breastfeeding assistance. This study investigated the effect of the pandemic on feeding choices and maternal wellbeing amongst breastfeeding mothers living in Australian and New Zealand. We conducted a cross-sectional online survey that examined feeding methods, maternal mental wellbeing, worries, challenges, and positive experiences during the pandemic. Most women were exclusively breastfeeding (82%). Partial breastfeeding was associated with perceived low milk supply and longer pregnancy duration during the pandemic. Reduced mental health and wellbeing was associated with lower levels of family functioning, increased perceived stress, and perinatal anxiety. Longer pregnancy duration during the pandemic was associated with lower mental health wellbeing scores, while higher perceived stress scores were reported for regions with higher COVID-19 infection rates and women with perceived low milk supply. Women reported that the pandemic resulted in less pressure and more time for family bonding, while worries about the pandemic, family health, and parenting challenges were also cited. Mental health concerns of breastfeeding women appear to be exacerbated by COVID-19, highlighting a critical need for access to mental health and broader family support during the pandemic.

18 May 2023 in Nutrients
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
INIsabella Norrish
Isabella Norrish
ASAzhar S. Sindi
Azhar S. Sindi
VSVanessa S. Sakalidis
Vanessa S. Sakalidis
CLCHING LAI
CHING LAI
JMJacki McEachran
Jacki McEachran
DGDonna Geddes
Donna Geddes
Human milk provides all of the elements necessary for infant growth and development. Previous studies have reported associations between breastfeeding and a reduced risk of developing obesity and late-onset metabolic disorders; however, the underlying mechanisms are poorly understood. Recently, intakes of human milk components have been associated with infant body composition, which is likely partially implicated in the reduced risk of developing childhood obesity among breastfed infants. In this systematic review, we searched electronic bibliographic databases for studies that explored relationships between the 24 h intakes of human milk macronutrients and bioactive components and infant body composition and/or growth parameters. Of 13 eligible studies, 10 assessed relationships of infant body composition and growth outcomes with human milk macronutrients, while 8 studies assessed relationships with human milk bioactive components. Significant time-dependent relationships with infant anthropometrics and body composition were found for intakes and no relationships for concentrations of several human milk components, such as lactose, total protein, and human milk oligosaccharides, suggesting that measuring concentrations of human milk components without quantifying the intake by the infant may provide a limited understanding. Future studies investigating the effect of human milk components on infant growth and body composition outcomes should consider measuring the actual intake of components and employ standardised methods for measuring milk intake.

SPSharon Lisa Perrella
Sharon Lisa Perrella
SASarah Gallo Abelha
Sarah Gallo Abelha
PVPhilip Vlaskovsky
Philip Vlaskovsky
JMJacki McEachran
Jacki McEachran
SPStuart A. Prosser
Stuart A. Prosser
DGDonna Geddes
Donna Geddes
Breastfeeding exclusivity and duration rates are lower after caesarean birth, yet the factors contributing to these are not well understood. This mixed-methods study used an anonymous online questionnaire to examine the facilitators and barriers to establishing breastfeeding as identified by Australian women after a caesarean birth. Quantitative data were reported using descriptive statistics, and multivariable models were used to determine the factors associated with breastfeeding outcomes including the timing of breastfeeding initiation, birth experience, and commercial infant formula use. Qualitative data were analysed using an inductive thematic analysis. Data were obtained for N = 961 women, of which <50% reported skin-to-skin contact during breastfeeding initiation. The barriers to breastfeeding included aspects of clinical care and reduced mobility, while unrushed care, partner support, and physical help with picking up the baby were helpful. Following a non-elective caesarean birth, women had half the odds of early breastfeeding initiation (OR = 0.50; 95% CI: 0.36, 0.68; p ≤ 0.001) and 10 times the odds to report a negative birth experience (OR = 10.2; 95% CI: 6.88, 15.43; p < 0.001). Commercial milk formula use was higher in primiparous women (OR = 2.16; 95% CI: 1.60, 2.91; p < 0.001) and in those that birthed in a private hospital (OR = 1.67; 95% CI: 1.25, 2.32; p = 0.001). Pain and reduced mobility, as well as conflicting and rushed care, negatively impacted breastfeeding after a caesarean birth, while delayed breastfeeding initiation, higher pain ratings, and negative birth experiences were more common for women that birthed by non-elective caesarean. This study adds valuable insights into the physical, emotional, and clinical care needs of women in establishing breastfeeding after a surgical birth. Clinical staffing and care should be modified to include full access to partner support to meet the specific needs of breastfeeding women after a caesarean birth.

26 August 2024 in Nutrients
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
XJXuehua Jin
Xuehua Jin
CLCHING LAI
CHING LAI
SPSharon Lisa Perrella
Sharon Lisa Perrella
JMJacki McEachran
Jacki McEachran
ZGZoya Gridneva
Zoya Gridneva
DGDonna Geddes
Donna Geddes
Background: Maternal breast volume is determined by the quantity of glandular and adipose tissue, and it undergoes significant changes during pregnancy. These changes are intricately linked to the development of glandular tissue, which most likely reflects lactation capacity. Evidence indicates that women with overweight or obesity exhibit larger breast volume compared to those with a normal body mass index (BMI), emphasizing the close relationship between breast volume and maternal adiposity. Hence, we aim to investigate breast volume growth and maternal BMI as potential risk factors for low milk production. Methods: Lactating women (n = 609) from the Perth metropolitan area in Western Australia between 2011 and 2023 were included in the analysis. Twenty-four-hour milk production measurements were conducted using the test weighing method, and milk removal frequencies were recorded. Mothers completed questionnaires regarding demographic, obstetric and infant details. Linear and logistic regression models were used to determine maternal and infant factors associated with milk production. Results: Here we show that increasing maternal age and BMI are associated with low milk production. Moreover, larger pre-pregnancy breast volume and breast growth are associated with both higher BMI and milk production. Conclusions: Women who are older, have an obese BMI and who have minimal pre-pregnancy breast volume and breast growth should be provided with antenatal screening and breastfeeding support as they are more likely to experience low milk production.

17 August 2022 in European Journal of Pediatrics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
VSVanessa S. Sakalidis
Vanessa S. Sakalidis
ARAlethea Rea
Alethea Rea
SPSharon Lisa Perrella
Sharon Lisa Perrella
JMJacki McEachran
Jacki McEachran
GCGrace Collis
Grace Collis
DGDonna Geddes
Donna Geddes
The COVID-19 pandemic has impacted new mothers’ wellbeing and breastfeeding experience. Women have experienced changes in birth and postnatal care and restricted access to their support network. It is unclear how these impacts may have changed over time with shifting rates of infection and policies restricting movement and access to services in Australia and New Zealand. This study investigated the longitudinal effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on breastfeeding and maternal wellbeing in Australia and New Zealand. Mothers (n = 246) completed an online survey every 4 weeks for 6 months that examined feeding methods, maternal mental wellbeing, worries, challenges, and positive experiences during the pandemic. Mothers maintained high full breastfeeding rates at 4 months (81%) which decreased to 37% at 6 months. Perceived low milk supply contributed to the earlier cessation of full breastfeeding. Poor infant sleep was associated with stress, perinatal anxiety, mental wellbeing, and breastfeeding status. Although mothers initially reported that lockdowns helped with family bonding and less pressure, prolonged lockdowns appeared to have adverse effects on access to social networks and extended family support.    Conclusion: The results highlight the changing dynamic of the pandemic and the need for adaptable perinatal services which allow mothers access to in-person services and their support network even in lockdowns. Similarly, access to continuous education and clinical care remains critical for women experiencing concerns about their milk supply, infant sleep, and their own wellbeing. What is Known:• The COVID-19 pandemic and lockdown restrictions have significantly affected perinatal mental health, disrupted maternal services, and subsequent breastfeeding. What is New:• In Australia and New Zealand, breastfeeding women experienced challenges to their mental wellbeing, sleep, and breastfeeding, which was likely exacerbated over time by the pandemic. Lockdowns, while initially beneficial for some families, became detrimental to maternal support and wellbeing.

11 November 2025 in Nutrients
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
XJXuehua Jin
Xuehua Jin
CLCHING LAI
CHING LAI
SPSharon Lisa Perrella
Sharon Lisa Perrella
ZGZoya Gridneva
Zoya Gridneva
JMJacki McEachran
Jacki McEachran
DGDonna Geddes
Donna Geddes
Background: Current low milk supply (LMS) definitions use subjective maternal perceptions or arbitrary thresholds for 24 h milk production (MP), potentially misclassifying cases. This study aimed to re-evaluate the definition of LMS using data-driven approaches and investigate associated maternal risk factors. Methods: Lactating mothers 4–26 weeks postpartum (n = 460) provided demographic, obstetric, and infant data and measured 24 h MP and infant milk intake using the test-weighing method. Infant growth was calculated as their weight-for-age z-score. Latent profile analysis, receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, and multinomial logistic regression were used for classification, diagnostic evaluation, and risk factor assessment for LMS. Results: Four milk supply classes emerged: Class 1 with adequate MP, infant intake and infant growth (n = 254); Class 2 with high MP exceeding infant demand and adequate growth (n = 30); Class 3 with slow infant growth despite moderate MP (n = 120); and Class 4 with extremely low MP and high formula intake (n = 56). Classes 1 and 2 were grouped as the normal milk supply group (61.7%), while Classes 3 and 4 formed the LMS group (38.3%). New thresholds were identified for 24 h MP (708 mL/24 h, area under the curve (AUC) = 0.92) and infant breast milk intake (694 mL/24 h, AUC = 0.94) with high diagnostic accuracy. Moreover, practical alternative thresholds for infant average daily weight gain (26 g, AUC = 0.89), formula intake (122 mL/24 h, AUC = 0.89) and formula-to-growth ratio (4 mL/g, AUC = 0.94) were established for the identification of LMS. Minimal breast growth during pregnancy (Odds ratio (OR) = 4.6, 95% confidence interval (CI): 2.3–9.6), advanced maternal age (OR = 2.1, 95% CI: 1.0–4.5), and gestational diabetes mellitus (OR = 2.1, 95% CI: 1.1–4.0) were significant risk factors related to the LMS subgroups. Co-existence of maternal advanced age and overweight showed greatly amplified risk of LMS (OR = 3.7, 95% CI: 1.3–10.5), and a more pronounced risk was observed for the combination of minimal breast growth and advanced maternal age (OR = 9.2, 95% CI: 3.0–28.3). Conclusions: This data-driven classification of LMS and identified risk factors may enhance the precision of LMS diagnosis and guide targeted interventions for lactating mothers.