Alessandro Agresta

Mr. Alessandro Agresta

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

18Years (2009-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
16 June 2021 in Microorganisms
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CAChiara Agrati
Chiara Agrati
Concetta CastillettiConcetta Castilletti
Concetta Castilletti
DELIA GOLETTIDELIA GOLETTI
DELIA GOLETTI
SMSilvia Meschi
Silvia Meschi
ASAlessandra Sacchi
Alessandra Sacchi
OGon behalf of the INMI COVID-190 Vaccine Study Group
on behalf of the INMI COVID-190 Vaccine Study Group
Vaccination is the main public health measure to reduce SARS-CoV-2 transmission and hospitalization, and a massive worldwide scientific effort resulted in the rapid development of effective vaccines. This work aimed to define the dynamics of humoral and cell-mediated immune response in a cohort of health care workers (HCWs) who received a two-dose BNT162b2-mRNA vaccination. The serological response was evaluated by quantifying the anti-RBD and neutralizing antibodies. The cell-mediated response was performed by a whole blood test quantifying Th1 cytokines (IFN-γ, TNF-α, IL-2), produced in response to spike peptides. The BNT162b2-mRNA vaccine induced both humoral and cell-mediated immune responses against spike peptides in virtually all HCWs without previous SARS-CoV-2 infection, with a moderate inverse relation with age in the anti-RBD response. Spike-specific T cells produced several Th1 cytokines (IFN-γ, TNF-α, and IL-2), which correlated with the specific-serological response. Overall, our study describes the ability of the BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine to elicit a coordinated neutralizing humoral and spike-specific T cell response in HCWs. Assessing the dynamics of these parameters by an easy immune monitoring protocol can allow for the evaluation of the persistence of the vaccine response in order to define the optimal vaccination strategy.

1 September 2013 in Transplantation Proceedings
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
GEGiuseppe Maria Ettorre
Giuseppe Maria Ettorre
PPPierluca Piselli
Pierluca Piselli
LGL. Galatioto
L. Galatioto
MRM. Rendina
M. Rendina
FNF. Nudo
F. Nudo
DSDiego Serraino
Diego Serraino

10 November 2017 in PLOS ONE
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Simone LaniniSimone Lanini
Simone Lanini
CMClaudia Minosse
Claudia Minosse
FVFrancesco Vairo
Francesco Vairo
AGAnnarosa Garbuglia
Annarosa Garbuglia
VBVirginia Di Bari
Virginia Di Bari
G(Gruppo Laziale Sorveglianza Epatiti Virali (GLaSEV)
Gruppo Laziale Sorveglianza Epatiti Virali (GLaSEV)
The hepatitis A virus (HAV) is mainly transmitted through the faecal-oral route. In industrialized countries HAV infection generally occurs as either sporadic cases in travelers from endemic areas, local outbreak within closed/semi-closed population and as foodborne community outbreak. Recently, an increasing number of HAV infection clusters have been reported among young men-who-have-sex-with-men (MSM). The Lazio Regional Service for the epidemiology and control for infectious diseases (SeRESMI) has noticed an increase of acute hepatitis A (AHA) since September 2016. Temporal analysis carried out with a discrete Poisson model using surveillance data between January 2016 and March 2017 evidenced an ongoing outbreak of AHA that started at the end of August. Molecular investigation carried out on 130 out of 513 cases AHA reported until March 2017 suggests that this outbreak is mainly supported by an HAV variant which is currently spreading within MSM communities across Europe (VRD_521_2016). The report confirms that AHA is an emerging issue among MSM. In addition through the integration of standard (case based) surveillance with molecular investigation we could discriminate, temporally concomitant but epidemiologically unrelated, clusters due to different HAV variants. As suggested by the WHO, in countries with low HAV circulation, vaccination programmes should be tailored on the local epidemiological patterns to prevent outbreaks among high risk groups and eventual spillover of the infection in the general population.

1 June 2012 in Journal of Clinical Virology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
AGAnna Rosa Garbuglia
Anna Rosa Garbuglia
PPPierluca Piselli
Pierluca Piselli
DLDaniele Lapa
Daniele Lapa
CSCatia Sias
Catia Sias
FNFranca Del Nonno
Franca Del Nonno
MCMaria Capobianchi
Maria Capobianchi

25 April 2018 in International Journal of Cancer
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MTMartina Taborelli
Martina Taborelli
PPPierluca Piselli
Pierluca Piselli
GEGiuseppe Maria Ettorre
Giuseppe Maria Ettorre
ALAugusto Lauro
Augusto Lauro
LGLaura Galatioto
Laura Galatioto
FSfor the Italian Transplant & Cancer Cohort Study
for the Italian Transplant & Cancer Cohort Study

8 June 2021 in Vaccines
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
VPVincenzo Puro
Vincenzo Puro
Concetta CastillettiConcetta Castilletti
Concetta Castilletti
CAChiara Agrati
Chiara Agrati
DELIA GOLETTIDELIA GOLETTI
DELIA GOLETTI
SLSara Leone
Sara Leone
OGon behalf of the INMI COVID-19 Vaccine Study Group
on behalf of the INMI COVID-19 Vaccine Study Group
Vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 is considered the most effective method of prevention to contain the pandemic. While highly effective SARS-CoV-2 vaccines are being applied on a large-scale, whether and to what extent the strength of the vaccine-induced immune response could be further potentiated is still an object of debate. Several reports studied the effect of different vaccines on the susceptibility and mortality of COVID-19, with conflicting results. We aimed to evaluate whether previous influenza and/or pneumococcal vaccination had an impact on the specific immune response to the SARS-CoV-2 BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine. The study population consists of 710 workers from our Institute who completed the BNT162b2 schedule and have been tested at least once after the second dose, from 27 December 2020 up to 15 April 2021. Of these, 152 (21.4%) had received an influenza and 215 (30.3%) a concomitant influenza and pneumococcal vaccination, a median of 102 days before the second dose of BNT162b2. Overall, 100% of workers were tested for anti-Spike receptor-binding domain (anti-S/RBD) antibodies, 224 workers for neutralization titer (Micro-neutralization assay, MNA), and 155 workers for a spike-specific T cell interferon-γ response (IFN-γ). The levels of anti-S/RBD, MNA and IFN-γ were evaluated and compared according to sex, age, involvement in direct care of COVID-19 patients, and previous influenza/pneumococcal vaccination. At the univariate analysis, no statistically significant association was observed with regard to a previous influenza and pneumococcal vaccination. A significant lower anti-S/RBD response was observed according to an older age and male sex, while MNA titers were significantly associated to sex but not to age. At the multivariable analysis, workers receiving a concomitant influenza and pneumococcal vaccination or only influenza showed a 58% (p 0.01) and 42% (p 0.07) increase in MNA titers, respectively, compared to those who did not receive an influenza/pneumococcal vaccination. Female workers showed an 81% MNA and a 44% anti-S/RBD increase compared to male workers (p < 0.001). Compared to workers aged 21 to 49 years, those aged 50 or older were associated with a reduction in the anti-S/RBD (16%; p 0.005), MNA (31%; p 0.019), and IFN.g (32%) immune response. Maintaining the influenza and pneumococcal immunization program for the coming season, in which COVID-19 could still be spreading, remains strongly recommended to protect those who are more vulnerable and to limit the potential burden of these infections on the healthcare system.