This review summarises the status of silent speech interface (SSI) research. SSIs rely on non-acoustic biosignals generated by the human body during speech production to enable communication whenever normal verbal communication is not possible or not desirable. In this review, we focus on the first case and present latest SSI research aimed at providing new alternative and augmentative communication methods for persons with severe speech disorders. SSIs can employ a variety of biosignals to enable silent communication, such as electrophysiological recordings of neural activity, electromyographic (EMG) recordings of vocal tract movements or the direct tracking of articulator movements using imaging techniques. Depending on the disorder, some sensing techniques may be better suited than others to capture speech-related information. For instance, EMG and imaging techniques are well suited for laryngectomised patients, whose vocal tract remains almost intact but are unable to speak after the removal of the vocal folds, but fail for severely paralysed individuals. From the biosignals, SSIs decode the intended message, using automatic speech recognition or speech synthesis algorithms. Despite considerable advances in recent years, most present-day SSIs have only been validated in laboratory settings for healthy users. Thus, as discussed in this paper, a number of challenges remain to be addressed in future research before SSIs can be promoted to real-world applications. If these issues can be addressed successfully, future SSIs will improve the lives of persons with severe speech impairments by restoring their communication capabilities.

Biometric systems are exposed to spoofing attacks which may compromise their security, and voice biometrics based on automatic speaker verification (ASV), is no exception. To increase the robustness against such attacks, anti-spoofing systems have been proposed for the detection of replay, synthesis and voice conversion-based attacks. However, most proposed anti-spoofing techniques are loosely integrated with the ASV system. In this work, we develop a new integration neural network which jointly processes the embeddings extracted from ASV and anti-spoofing systems in order to detect both zero-effort impostors and spoofing attacks. Moreover, we propose a new loss function based on the minimization of the area under the expected (AUE) performance and spoofability curve (EPSC), which allows us to optimize the integration neural network on the desired operating range in which the biometric system is expected to work. To evaluate our proposals, experiments were carried out on the recent ASVspoof 2019 corpus, including both logical access (LA) and physical access (PA) scenarios. The experimental results show that our proposal clearly outperforms some well-known techniques based on the integration at the score- and embedding-level. Specifically, our proposal achieves up to 23.62% and 22.03% relative equal error rate (EER) improvement over the best performing baseline in the LA and PA scenarios, respectively, as well as relative gains of 27.62% and 29.15% on the AUE metric.

Biometric systems are exposed to spoofing attacks which may compromise their security, and voice biometrics, also known as automatic speaker verification (ASV), is no exception. Replay, synthesis and voice conversion attacks cause false acceptances that can be detected by anti-spoofing systems. Recently, deep neural networks (DNNs) which extract embedding vectors have shown superior performance than conventional systems in both ASV and anti-spoofing tasks. In this work, we develop a new concept of loss function for training DNNs which is based on kernel density estimation (KDE) techniques. The proposed loss functions estimate the probability density function (pdf) of every training class in each mini-batch, and compute a log likelihood matrix between the embedding vectors and pdfs of all training classes within the mini-batch in order to obtain the KDE-based loss. To evaluate our proposal for spoofing detection, experiments were carried out on the recent ASVspoof 2019 corpus, including both logical and physical access scenarios. The experimental results show that training a DNN based anti-spoofing system with our proposed loss functions clearly outperforms the performance of the same system being trained with other well-known loss functions. Moreover, the results also show that the proposed loss functions are effective for different types of neural network architectures.

Automatic speaker verification (ASV) is a voice biometric technology whose security might be compromised by spoofing attacks. To increase the robustness against spoofing attacks, presentation attack detection (PAD) or anti-spoofing systems for detecting replay, text-to-speech and voice conversion-based spoofing attacks are being developed. However, it was recently shown that adversarial spoofing attacks may seriously fool anti-spoofing systems. Moreover, the robustness of the whole biometric system (ASV + PAD) against this new type of attack is completely unexplored. In this work, a new generative adversarial network for biometric anti-spoofing (GANBA) is proposed. GANBA has a twofold basis: (1) it jointly employs the anti-spoofing and ASV losses to yield very damaging adversarial spoofing attacks, and (2) it trains the PAD as a discriminator in order to make them more robust against these types of adversarial attacks. The proposed system is able to generate adversarial spoofing attacks which can fool the complete voice biometric system. Then, the resulting PAD discriminators of the proposed GANBA can be used as a defense technique for detecting both original and adversarial spoofing attacks. The physical access (PA) and logical access (LA) scenarios of the ASVspoof 2019 database were employed to carry out the experiments. The experimental results show that the GANBA attacks are quite effective, outperforming other adversarial techniques when applied in white-box and black-box attack setups. In addition, the resulting PAD discriminators are more robust against both original and adversarial spoofing attacks.