Dirk Erpenbeck

Prof. Dr. Dirk Erpenbeck

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

20Years (2007-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 June 2012 in Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
DEDirk Erpenbeck
Dirk Erpenbeck
PSPatricia Sutcliffe
Patricia Sutcliffe
SCSteve de C. Cook
Steve de C. Cook
ADAndreas Dietzel
Andreas Dietzel
MMManuel Maldonado
Manuel Maldonado
Dr. Gert WörheideDr. Gert Wörheide
Dr. Gert Wörheide

1 April 2010 in PLOS ONE
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JPJudith Pöppe
Judith Pöppe
PSPatricia Sutcliffe
Patricia Sutcliffe
JHJohn Hooper
John Hooper
Dr. Gert WörheideDr. Gert Wörheide
Dr. Gert Wörheide
DEDirk Erpenbeck
Dirk Erpenbeck
DNA barcoding is a promising tool to facilitate a rapid and unambiguous identification of sponge species. Demosponges of the order Dictyoceratida are particularly challenging to identify, but are of ecological as well as biochemical importance. Here we apply DNA barcoding with the standard CO1-barcoding marker on selected Indo-Pacific specimens of two genera, Ircinia and Psammocinia of the family Irciniidae. We show that the CO1 marker identifies several species new to science, reveals separate radiation patterns of deep-sea Ircinia sponges and indicates dispersal patterns of Psammocinia species. However, some species cannot be unambiguously barcoded by solely this marker due to low evolutionary rates. We support previous suggestions for a combination of the standard CO1 fragment with an additional fragment for sponge DNA barcoding.

1 April 2016 in Marine Pollution Bulletin
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
DEDirk Erpenbeck
Dirk Erpenbeck
OOliver Voigt
Oliver Voigt
AAAli M. Al-Aidaroos
Ali M. Al-Aidaroos
MBMichael Berumen
Michael Berumen
GBGabriele Büttner
Gabriele Büttner
Dr. Gert WörheideDr. Gert Wörheide
Dr. Gert Wörheide

2 April 2021 in PeerJ
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ASAstrid Schuster
Astrid Schuster
SPShirley A. Pomponi
Shirley A. Pomponi
APAndrzej Pisera
Andrzej Pisera
PCPaco Cárdenas
Paco Cárdenas
MKMichelle Kelly
Michelle Kelly
DEDirk Erpenbeck
Dirk Erpenbeck
Background: Among all present demosponges, lithistids represent a polyphyletic group with exceptionally well-preserved fossils dating back to the Cambrian. Knowledge of their recent diversity, particularly in the Tropical Western Atlantic Ocean (TWA) where they are common in deep waters, is scarce making any comparison between present and past major ‘lithistid’ faunas difficult. In addition, the lack of sufficient molecular and morphological data hamper any predictions on phylogenetic relationships or phylodiversity from this region. The Harbor Branch Oceanographic Institute (HBOI, Fort Pierce, Florida) holds the largest collection of TWA lithistid sponges worldwide, however, the majority remain to be taxonomically identified and revised.Principal Findings: In this study we provide sequences of 249 lithistid demosponges using two independent molecular markers (28S rDNA (C1-D2) andcox1mtDNA). In addition, a morphological documentation of 70 lithistid specimens is provided in the database of the Sponge Barcoding Project (SBP). This integrated dataset represents the largest and most comprehensive of the TWA lithistids to date. The phylogenetic diversity of ‘lithistid’ demosponges in the Bahamas and Jamaica are high in comparison to other TWA regions; Theonellidae and Corallistidae dominate the fauna, while Neopeltidae and Macandrewiidae are rare. A proposed tetractinellid suborder, one undescribed genus and several undescribed species are recognized and the Pacific ‘lithistid’ genera,HerengeriaandAwhiowhio, are reported from the TWA for the first time. The higher-taxa relationships of desma-bearing tetractinellids are discussed and topics for revision suggested.Conclusion: This first integrative approach of TWA ‘lithistid’ demosponges contributes to a better understanding of their phylogenetic affinities, diversity and bathymetric distribution patterns within the TWA. As in the Pacific, the TWA ‘lithistid’ demosponges dominate deep-water habitats. Deeper taxonomic investigations will undoubtedly contribute to a better comparison between present major ‘lithistid’ faunas and their fossil record in the Mesozoic.

20 March 2017 in BMC Ecology and Evolution
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ASAstrid Schuster
Astrid Schuster
JLJose Lopez
Jose Lopez
LBLeontine E. Becking
Leontine E. Becking
Michele KellyMichele Kelly
Michele Kelly
SPShirley A Pomponi
Shirley A Pomponi
PCPaco Cárdenas
Paco Cárdenas
Mitochondrial introns intermit coding regions of genes and feature characteristic secondary structures and splicing mechanisms. In metazoans, mitochondrial introns have only been detected in sponges, cnidarians, placozoans and one annelid species. Within demosponges, group I and group II introns are present in six families. Based on different insertion sites within the cox1 gene and secondary structures, four types of group I and two types of group II introns are known, which can harbor up to three encoding homing endonuclease genes (HEG) of the LAGLIDADG family (group I) and/or reverse transcriptase (group II). However, only little is known about sponge intron mobility, transmission, and origin due to the lack of a comprehensive dataset. We analyzed the largest dataset on sponge mitochondrial group I introns to date: 95 specimens, from 11 different sponge genera which provided novel insights into the evolution of group I introns. For the first time group I introns were detected in four genera of the sponge family Scleritodermidae (Scleritoderma, Microscleroderma, Aciculites, Setidium). We demonstrated that group I introns in sponges aggregate in the most conserved regions of cox1. We showed that co-occurrence of two introns in cox1 is unique among metazoans, but not uncommon in sponges. However, this combination always associates an active intron with a degenerating one. Earlier hypotheses of HGT were confirmed and for the first time VGT and secondary losses of introns conclusively demonstrated. This study validates the subclass Spirophorina (Tetractinellida) as an intron hotspot in sponges. Our analyses confirm that most sponge group I introns probably originated from fungi. DNA barcoding is discussed and the application of alternative primers suggested.

1 January 2009 in BMC Genomics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
DEDirk Erpenbeck
Dirk Erpenbeck
OOliver Voigt
Oliver Voigt
Dr. Gert WörheideDr. Gert Wörheide
Dr. Gert Wörheide
DLDennis V Lavrov
Dennis V Lavrov
The mitochondrial (mt) genomes of sponges possess a variety of features, which appear to be intermediate between those of Eumetazoa and non-metazoan opisthokonts. Among these features is the presence of long intergenic regions, which are common in other eukaryotes, but generally absent in Eumetazoa. Here we analyse poriferan mitochondrial intergenic regions, paying particular attention to repetitive sequences within them. In this context we introduce the mitochondrial genome of Ircinia strobilina (Lamarck, 1816; Demospongiae: Dictyoceratida) and compare it with mtDNA of other sponges.