Chandula De Zoysa

Ms. Chandula De Zoysa


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

5Years (2022-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
23 August 2022 in Architecture
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
TPThisara Geethika Perera
Thisara Geethika Perera
CZChandula De Zoysa
Chandula De Zoysa
SASonali Erandi Abeysinghe
Sonali Erandi Abeysinghe
RHRichard Haigh
Richard Haigh
Dilanthi AmaratungaDilanthi Amaratunga
Dilanthi Amaratunga
RDRanjith Dissanayake
Ranjith Dissanayake
Tsunamis pose significant challenges for disaster reduction efforts due to the multi-hazard, cascading nature of these events, including a range of different potential triggering and consequential hazards. Although infrequent, they have the potential to cause devastating human and economic losses. Effective urban planning has been recognised as an important strategy for reducing disaster risk in cities. However, there have been limited studies on urban planning for tsunami-prone areas, and there have been wide ranging strategies adopted globally. This is an international study aimed at exploring the status of urban planning in tsunami areas and better understanding potential urban planning strategies to reduce disaster risk in coastal regions. Drawing upon the work of an international collaborative research team, in this article, we present the findings of a systematic review of the urban planning literature. Using the PRISMA guidelines, 56 papers were selected, and three guiding questions informed the review. Further empirical investigations were carried out in Sri Lanka by a local research team, including twelve semi-structured interviews with representatives from agencies in urban planning, construction, and disaster management, and a focus group representing town and country planning, architecture, structural engineering, disaster management, landscape and geospatial planning, building services, green buildings and infrastructure and environmental management fields. The combined analysis reveals insights into the characteristics of the literature, as well as the nature of existing strategies for urban planning in tsunami-prone areas, grouped into six broad themes: community participation, spatial planning, soft and hard engineering;,evacuation planning, and resilience thinking. The findings also reveal limitations in existing strategies, including their failure to address multi-hazard threats and systemic risk, as well as inadequate community participation, and limited access to timely disaster risk information. The findings are used to inform an initial model of urban planning strategies in tsunami-prone areas that can be used before a hazard event occurs, during and in the immediate response to a hazard event, and during recovery and reconstruction following a disaster.

9 May 2022 in Smart and Sustainable Built Environment
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SASonali Abeysinghe
Sonali Abeysinghe
CZChandula De Zoysa
Chandula De Zoysa
Chandana SiriwardanaChandana Siriwardana
Chandana Siriwardana
CBChaminda Senarathna Bandara
Chaminda Senarathna Bandara
RDRanjith Dissanayake
Ranjith Dissanayake
Purpose: The purpose of the study is to mainstream the disaster risk reduction (DRR) and disaster resilience measures into the GreenSL® building rating system in Sri Lanka to demonstrate a more holistic approach in achieving sustainability with resilience.Design/methodology/approach: First, a comprehensive literature review was carried out on green building practices and rating tools, natural hazards and DRR and global and local frameworks. Next, criteria were developed incorporating the disaster resilience aspects through eight expert committee meetings and included the rating tool in three levels. Finally, 11 green-certified buildings from the Green Building Council of Sri Lanka were reevaluated using the new disaster resilient GREENSL® rating system for built environment as a validation for the new tool and to analyze the new certification levels.Findings: All the green-certified buildings in hazard-prone areas dropped their certification by one level while the buildings in nonhazard-prone areas remained in the certification after being evaluated by the new DRR-incorporated rating system, which recommends the use of new tool for the buildings in hazard-prone areas. But due to the rapid changes in climate and the unpredictable trends of natural hazards, the use of new DRR incorporated GREENSL® rating system for built environment for the certification of buildings is highly endorsed.Originality/value: This is the first research study based on the GREENSL rating system. And it is the first effort to incorporate DRR aspects to any rating tool in Sri Lanka. The projects that were evaluated for the validation of the new tool are the actual projects which obtained green building certification. Also, it is apparent that this study has gone some way towards enhancing the understanding of blending the sustainability and resilience in rating systems for built environment.

29 September 2022
Verified
Book Chapter
Closed access
PDF file
CZChandula De Zoysa
Chandula De Zoysa
AAA. A. S. E. Abeysinghe
A. A. S. E. Abeysinghe
UPU. T. G. Perera
U. T. G. Perera
CSC. S. A. Siriwardana
C. S. A. Siriwardana
PDP. B. R. Dissanayake
P. B. R. Dissanayake
DAD. Amaratunga
D. Amaratunga