Nikolay Kondratyev

Mr. Nikolay Kondratyev


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

11Years (2016-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
13 January 2020 in Nature Neuroscience
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
GIGROUP Investigators
GROUP Investigators
ERElliott Rees
Elliott Rees
JHJun Han
Jun Han
JMJoanne Morgan
Joanne Morgan
NCNoa Carrera
Noa Carrera
MOMichael J. Owen
Michael J. Owen

18 January 2020 in Cells
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
AGArkadiy Golov
Arkadiy Golov
NKNikolay Kondratyev
Nikolay Kondratyev
GKGeorge Kostyuk
George Kostyuk
VGVera Golimbet
Vera Golimbet
Recent advances in psychiatric genetics have led to the discovery of dozens of genomic loci associated with schizophrenia. However, a gap exists between the detection of genetic associations and understanding the underlying molecular mechanisms. This review describes the basic approaches used in the so-called post-GWAS studies to generate biological interpretation of the existing population genetic data, including both molecular (creation and analysis of knockout animals, exploration of the transcriptional effects of common variants in human brain cells) and computational (fine-mapping of causal variability, gene set enrichment analysis, partitioned heritability analysis) methods. The results of the crucial studies, in which these approaches were used to uncover the molecular and neurobiological basis of the disease, are also reported.

23 September 2020 in Scientific Reports
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
AGArkadiy Golov
Arkadiy Golov
DADmitrii A. Abashkin
Dmitrii A. Abashkin
NKNikolay Kondratyev
Nikolay Kondratyev
SRSergey V. Razin
Sergey V. Razin
AGAlexey A. Gavrilov
Alexey A. Gavrilov
VGVera E. Golimbet
Vera E. Golimbet
Large-scale epigenomic projects have mapped hundreds of thousands of potential regulatory sites in the human genome, but only a small proportion of these elements are proximal to transcription start sites. It is believed that the majority of these sequences are remote promoter-activating genomic sites scattered within several hundreds of kilobases from their cognate promoters and referred to as enhancers. It is still unclear what principles, aside from relative closeness in the linear genome, determine which promoter(s) is controlled by a given enhancer; however, this understanding is of great fundamental and clinical relevance. In recent years, C-methods (chromosome conformation capture-based methods) have become a powerful tool for the identification of enhancer–promoter spatial contacts that, in most cases, reflect their functional link. Here, we describe a new hybridisation-based promoter Capture-C protocol that makes use of biotinylated dsDNA probes generated by PCR from a custom pool of long oligonucleotides. The described protocol allows high-resolution promoter interactome description, providing a flexible and cost-effective alternative to the existing promoter Capture-C modifications. Based on the obtained data, we propose several tips on probe design that could potentially improve the results of future experiments.

15 November 2021 in Cells
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
NKNikolay Kondratyev
Nikolay Kondratyev
MAMargarita V Alfimova
Margarita V Alfimova
AGArkadiy Golov
Arkadiy Golov
VGVera Golimbet
Vera Golimbet
Scientifically interesting as well as practically important phenotypes often belong to the realm of complex traits. To the extent that these traits are hereditary, they are usually ‘highly polygenic’. The study of such traits presents a challenge for researchers, as the complex genetic architecture of such traits makes it nearly impossible to utilise many of the usual methods of reverse genetics, which often focus on specific genes. In recent years, thousands of genome-wide association studies (GWAS) were undertaken to explore the relationships between complex traits and a large number of genetic factors, most of which are characterised by tiny effects. In this review, we aim to familiarise ‘wet biologists’ with approaches for the interpretation of GWAS results, to clarify some issues that may seem counterintuitive and to assess the possibility of using GWAS results in experiments on various complex traits.

3 May 2019 in Journal of Molecular Neuroscience
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MAMargarita V Alfimova
Margarita V Alfimova
NKNikolay Kondratyev
Nikolay Kondratyev
ATAlexander S. Tomyshev
Alexander S. Tomyshev
ILIrina S. Lebedeva
Irina S. Lebedeva
TLTatyana V. Lezheiko
Tatyana V. Lezheiko
VGVera E. Golimbet
Vera E. Golimbet

23 October 2018 in Clinical Epigenetics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
NKNikolay Kondratyev
Nikolay Kondratyev
AGArkadiy Golov
Arkadiy Golov
MAMargarita Alfimova
Margarita Alfimova
TLTatiana Lezheiko
Tatiana Lezheiko
VGVera Golimbet
Vera Golimbet
Methylation of DNA is associated with a variety of biological processes. With whole-genome studies of DNA methylation, it became possible to determine a set of genomic sites where DNA methylation is associated with a specific phenotype. A method is needed that allows detailed follow-up studies of the sites, including taking into account genetic information. Bisulfite PCR is a natural choice for this kind of task, but multiplexing is one of the most important problems impeding its implementation. To address this task, we took advantage of a recently published method based on Pacbio sequencing of long bisulfite PCR products (single-molecule real-time bisulfite sequencing, SMRT-BS) and tested the validity of the improved methodology with a smoking phenotype. Herein, we describe the “panhandle” modification of the method, which permits a more robust PCR with multiple targets. We applied this technique to determine smoking by DNA methylation in 71 healthy people and 83 schizophrenia patients (n = 50 smokers and n = 104 non-smokers, Russians of the Moscow region). We used five targets known to be influenced by smoking (regions of genes AHRR, ALPPL2, IER3, GNG12, and GFI1). We discovered significant allele-specific methylation effects in the AHRR and IER3 regions and assessed how this information could be exploited to improve the prediction of smoking based on the collected DNA methylation data. We found no significant difference in the methylation profiles of selected targets in relation to schizophrenia suggesting that smoking affects methylation at the studied genomic sites in healthy people and schizophrenia patients in a similar way. We determined that SMRT-BS with “panhandle” modification performs well in the described setting. Additional information regarding methylation and allele-specific effects could improve the predictive accuracy of DNA methylation-based models, which could be valuable for both basic research and clinical applications.