The outstanding clinical success of immune checkpoint blockade has revived the interest in underlying mechanisms of the immune system that are capable of eliminating tumors even in advanced stages. In this scenario, CD4 and CD8 T cell responses are part of the cancer immune cycle and both populations significantly influence the clinical outcome. In general, the immune system has evolved several mechanisms to protect the host against cancer. Each of them has to be undermined or evaded during cancer development to enable tumor outgrowth. In this review, we give an overview of T lymphocyte-driven control of tumor growth and discuss the involved tumor-suppressive mechanisms of the immune system, such as senescence surveillance, cancer immunosurveillance, and cancer immunoediting with respect to recent clinical developments of immunotherapies. The main focus is on the currently existing knowledge about the CD4 and CD8 T lymphocyte interplay that mediates the control of tumor growth.

There is evidence that viral oncolysis is synergistic with immune checkpoint inhibition in cancer therapy but the underlying mechanisms are unclear. Here, we investigated whether local viral infection of malignant tumors is capable of overcoming systemic resistance to PD-1-immunotherapy by modulating the spectrum of tumor-directed CD8 T-cells. To focus on neoantigen-specific CD8 T-cell responses, we performed transcriptomic sequencing of PD-1-resistant CMT64 lung adenocarcinoma cells followed by algorithm-based neoepitope prediction. Investigations on neoepitope-specific T-cell responses in tumor-bearing mice demonstrated that PD-1 immunotherapy was insufficient whereas viral oncolysis elicited cytotoxic T-cell responses to a conserved panel of neoepitopes. After combined treatment, we observed that PD-1-blockade did not affect the magnitude of oncolysis-mediated antitumoral immune responses but a broader spectrum of T-cell responses including additional neoepitopes was observed. Oncolysis of the primary tumor significantly abrogated systemic resistance to PD-1-immunotherapy leading to improved elimination of disseminated lung tumors. Our observations were confirmed in a transgenic murine model of liver cancer where viral oncolysis strongly induced PD-L1 expression in primary liver tumors and lung metastasis. Furthermore, we demonstrated that combined treatment completely inhibited dissemination in a CD8 T-cell-dependent manner. Therefore, our results strongly recommend further evaluation of virotherapy and concomitant PD-1 immunotherapy in clinical studies.

Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) is defined as a chronic liver disease with loss of tolerance against liver tissue eventually leading to cirrhosis if left untreated. 80%-90% of patients can be treated with a life-long immunosuppression. Unfortunately, there are strong drug-related side effects and steroid-refractory patients. Therefore, there is a need for a model system to investigate the complex immunopathogenesis of this chronic disease and subsequently to develop new therapeutic interventions. We developed a new model of experimental murine AIH (emAIH) by a self-limited adenoviral infection with the hepatic autoantigen formiminotransferase cyclodeaminase (FTCD). After an initial transient hepatitis there was a chronic evolving AIH, finally leading to portal and lobular fibrosis. We could show that the genetic predisposition provided by the NOD background was essential for creating a fertile field for the development of liver-specific autoimmunity. However, a strong environmental trigger was additionally necessary to initiate the disease. Besides the break of humoral tolerance, T-cell tolerance against hepatic self-antigens was also broken and CD4+ T cells were identified as essential drivers of the disease. As the disease was successfully treated with prednisolone and budesonide, the model will be helpful to develop and test new therapeutic interventions. Conclusion : We developed a new murine AIH model closely resembling AIH in patients that explains the mechanisms of AIH pathophysiology. In addition, emAIH provides options to test therapeutic alternatives for patients not achieving remission, with reduced side effects of chronic nonspecific immunosuppression. (Hepatology 2013;58:718–728)

Oncolytic virotherapy has shown impressive results in preclinical studies and first promising therapeutic outcomes in clinical trials as well. Since viruses are known for a long time as excellent vaccination agents, oncolytic viruses are now designed as novel anticancer agents combining the aspect of lysis-dependent cytoreductive activity with concomitant induction of antitumoral immune responses. Antitumoral immune activation by oncolytic virus infection of tumor tissue comprises both, immediate effects of innate immunity and also adaptive responses for long lasting antitumoral activity which is regarded as the most prominent challenge in clinical oncology. To date, the complex effects of a viral tumor infection on the tumor microenvironment and the consequences for the tumor-infiltrating immune cell compartment are poorly understood. However, there is more and more evidence that a tumor infection by an oncolytic virus opens up a number of options for further immunomodulating interventions such as systemic chemotherapy, generic immunostimulating strategies, dendritic cell-based vaccines, and antigenic libraries to further support clinical efficacy of oncolytic virotherapy.