Georg  Eickerling

Dr. Georg Eickerling

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

23Years (2004-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
12 January 2015 in Angewandte Chemie International Edition
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
WSWolfgang Scherer
Wolfgang Scherer
ADAndrew C. Dunbar
Andrew C. Dunbar
JBJosé Enrique Barquera-Lozada
José Enrique Barquera-Lozada
DSDominik Schmitz
Dominik Schmitz
GEGeorg Eickerling
Georg Eickerling
CKChristine Kuntscher
Christine Kuntscher

24 August 2011 in The Journal of Physical Chemistry A
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
AFA. Fischer
A. Fischer
DTdavide tiana
davide tiana
WSWolfgang Scherer
Wolfgang Scherer
KBK. Batke
K. Batke
GEGeorg Eickerling
Georg Eickerling
BIB. B. Iversen
B. B. Iversen

20 October 2007 in Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
GEGeorg Eickerling
Georg Eickerling
RMRemigius Mastalerz
Remigius Mastalerz
VHVerena Herz
Verena Herz
WSWolfgang Scherer
Wolfgang Scherer
HHHans-Jörg Himmel
Hans-Jörg Himmel
MRMarkus Reiher
Markus Reiher

3 February 2006 in New Journal of Chemistry
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
WSWolfgang Scherer
Wolfgang Scherer
GEGeorg Eickerling
Georg Eickerling
DSDmitry Shorokhov
Dmitry Shorokhov
EGEmanuel Gullo
Emanuel Gullo
GMG. Sean McGrady
G. Sean McGrady
PSPeter Sirsch
Peter Sirsch
Combined experimental and theoretical charge density studies of the complex [Ni(η2-C2H4)dbpe] (dbpe = But2PCH2CH2PBut2), 1, reveal how the location and magnitude of charge concentrations in the valence shell of the metal atom influence the σ- and π-components of the metal–olefin interaction.

10 March 2010 in Angewandte Chemie International Edition
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
WSWolfgang Scherer
Wolfgang Scherer
DWDavid J. Wolstenholme
David J. Wolstenholme
VHVerena Herz
Verena Herz
GEGeorg Eickerling
Georg Eickerling
ABAndreas Brück
Andreas Brück
Peter RoeskyPeter Roesky
Peter Roesky

28 January 2008 in The Journal of Chemical Physics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
KKKarin Kiewisch
Karin Kiewisch
GEGeorg Eickerling
Georg Eickerling
MRMarkus Reiher
Markus Reiher
JNJohannes Neugebauer
Johannes Neugebauer
In this study, we compare the electron densities for a set of hydrogen-bonded complexes obtained with either conventional Kohn-Sham density functional theory (DFT) calculations or with the frozen-density embedding (FDE) method, which is a subsystem approach to DFT. For a detailed analysis of the differences between these two methods, we compare the topology of the electron densities obtained from Kohn-Sham DFT and FDE in terms of deformation densities, bond critical points, and the negative Laplacian of the electron density. Different kinetic-energy functionals as needed for the frozen-density embedding method are tested and compared to a purely electrostatic embedding. It is shown that FDE is able to reproduce the characteristics of the density in the bonding region even in systems such as the F–H–F− molecule, which contains one of the strongest hydrogen bonds. Basis functions on the frozen system are usually required to accurately reproduce the electron densities of supermolecular calculations. However, it is shown here that it is in general sufficient to provide just a few basis functions in the boundary region between the two subsystems so that the use of the full supermolecular basis set can be avoided. It also turns out that electron-density deformations upon bonding predicted by FDE lack directionality with currently available functionals for the nonadditive kinetic-energy contribution.