As generative NLP can now produce content nearly indistinguishable from human writing, it is becoming difficult to identify genuine research contributions in academic writing and scientific publications. Moreover, information in machine-generated text can be factually wrong or even entirely fabricated. In this work, we introduce a novel benchmark dataset containing human-written and machine-generated scientific papers from SCIgen, GPT-2, GPT-3, ChatGPT, and Galactica, as well as papers co-created by humans and ChatGPT. We also experiment with several types of classifiers—linguistic-based and transformer-based—for detecting the authorship of scientific text. A strong focus is put on generalization capabilities and explainability to highlight the strengths and weaknesses of these detectors. Our work makes an important step towards creating more robust methods for distinguishing between human-written and machine-generated scientific papers, ultimately ensuring the integrity of scientific literature.
We introduce the first study of the automatic detoxification of Russian texts to combat offensive language. This kind of textual style transfer can be used for processing toxic content on social media or for eliminating toxicity in automatically generated texts. While much work has been done for the English language in this field, there are no works on detoxification for the Russian language. We suggest two types of models—an approach based on BERT architecture that performs local corrections and a supervised approach based on a pretrained GPT-2 language model. We compare these methods with several baselines. In addition, we provide the training datasets and describe the evaluation setup and metrics for automatic and manual evaluation. The results show that the tested approaches can be successfully used for detoxification, although there is room for improvement.
The rapid spread of deceptive information on the internet can have severe and irreparable consequences. As a result, it is important to develop technology that can detect fake news. Although significant progress has been made in this area, current methods are limited because they focus only on one language and do not incorporate multilingual information. In this work, we propose Multiverse—a new feature based on multilingual evidence that can be used for fake news detection and improve existing approaches. Our hypothesis that cross-lingual evidence can be used as a feature for fake news detection is supported by manual experiments based on a set of true (legit) and fake news. Furthermore, we compared our fake news classification system based on the proposed feature with several baselines on two multi-domain datasets of general-topic news and one fake COVID-19 news dataset, showing that (in combination with linguistic features) it yields significant improvements over the baseline models, bringing additional useful signals to the classifier.
Daryna Dementieva, Daniil Moskovskiy, David Dale, Alexander Panchenko. Proceedings of the 13th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing and the 3rd Conference of the Asia-Pacific Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2023.
Nowadays, misleading information spreads over the internet at an incredible speed, which can lead to irreparable consequences. As a result, it is becoming more and more essential to combat fake news, especially in the early stages of its origins. Over the past years, a lot of work has been done in this direction. However, all existed solutions have their limitations. One of the main limitations of the current approaches is that the majority of the models are focused only on one language and do not use any multilingual information. In this work, we investigate the new approach of fake news detection based on multilingual evidence. We show effectiveness of the proposed approach in a manual and an automated evaluation experiments.