This review describes acetaminophen pharmacokinetics (PK) throughout pregnancy, as analyzed by three methods (non-compartmental analyses (NCA), population PK, and physiologically based PK (PBPK) modelling). Eighteen studies using NCA were reported in the scientific literature. These studies reported an increase in the volume of distribution (3.5–60.7%) and an increase in the clearance (36.8–84.4%) of acetaminophen in pregnant women compared to non-pregnant women. Only two studies using population PK modelling as a technique were available in the literature. The largest difference in acetaminophen clearance (203%) was observed in women at delivery compared to non-pregnant women. One study using the PBPK technique was found in the literature. This study focused on the formation of metabolites, and the toxic metabolite N-acetyl-p-benzoquinone imine was the highest in the first trimester, followed by the second and third trimester, compared with non-pregnant women. In conclusion, this review gave an overview on acetaminophen PK changes in pregnancy. Also, knowledge gaps, such as fetal and placenta PK parameters, have been identified, which should be explored further before dosing adjustments can be suggested on an evidence-based basis.

Over 75 kinase inhibitors (KIs) have been approved for the treatment of various cancers. KIs are orally administrated but mostly lack pediatric age-appropriate dosage forms or instructions for dose manipulation. This is highly problematic for clinical practice in pediatric oncology, as flexible oral formulations are essential to individually set dosages and to adjust it to a child’s swallowability. Most KIs are poorly soluble, categorized in Biopharmaceutics Classification System (BCS) class II or IV, and improperly manipulating the KI formulation can alter pharmacokinetics and jeopardize KI drug safety and efficacy. Therefore, the goals of this review were to provide practical recommendations for manipulating the formulation of the 15 most frequently used KIs in pediatric oncology (i.e., bosutinib, cabozantinib, cobimetinib, crizotinib, dabrafenib, dasatinib, entrectinib, imatinib, larotrectinib, nilotinib, ponatinib, ruxolitinib, selumetinib, sunitinib and trametinib) based on available literature studies and fundamental drug characteristics and to establish a decision tool that supports decisions regarding formulation manipulation of solid oral dosages of KIs that have been or will be licensed (for adult and/or pediatric cancers) but are not included in this review.