Sreelakshmi Vattaparambil Sudarsan

Dr. Sreelakshmi Vattaparambil Sudarsan


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

7Years (2020-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
29 June 2021 in IEEE Access
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
SSSreelakshmi Vattaparambil Sudarsan
Sreelakshmi Vattaparambil Sudarsan
OSOlov Schelén
Olov Schelén
UBUlf Bodin
Ulf Bodin
Authentication, authorization, and digital identity management are core features required by secure digital systems. In this, authorization is a key component for regulating the detailed access credentials with respect to required service resources. Authorization, therefore, plays a significant role in the trust management of autonomous devices and services. Due to the heterogeneous nature of cyber-physical systems and the Internet of Things, several authorization techniques using different access control models, accounts, groups, tokens, and delegations have both strengths and weaknesses. Many studies exist in the literature that focus on other main security requirements, such as authentication, identity management, and confidentiality. However, there is a need for a comprehensive review of different authorization techniques in cyber-physical systems and the Internet of Things. A specific target of this paper is authorization in the cyber-physical system and Internet of Things networks with non-constrained devices in an industrial context with mobility, subcontractors, and autonomous machines that are able to carry out advanced tasks on behalf of others. We study the different authorization techniques using our three-dimensional classification, including access control models, subgranting models, and authorization governance. We focus on the state of the art of authorization subgranting, including delegation techniques by access control/authorization server and self-contained authorization using a new concept of power of attorney. Comparisons are performed with respect to several parameters, such as type of communication, method of authorization, control of expiration, and use of techniques such as public key certificate, encryption techniques, and tokens. The results show the differences and similarities of server-based and power of attorney-based authorization subgranting. The most common standards are also analyzed in light of those classifications.

7 April 2023 in IEEE Internet of Things Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
SSSreelakshmi Vattaparambil Sudarsan
Sreelakshmi Vattaparambil Sudarsan
OSOlov Schelén
Olov Schelén
UBUlf Bodin
Ulf Bodin
Many Cyber-Physical Systems are today semiautonomous and powerful enough to perform advanced tasks on their own. This means they can also act as representatives of people or devices that have given them an order. However, traditional access control policies and delegation models do not meet industrial requirements such as support for letting autonomous CPS devices act on their own with certified credentials under the sub authorization by subcontractors, without the need for a separate account per device. In this paper, we analyze and compare power of attorney, proxy signature by warrant, and OAuth to identify the strengths and challenges of each. Based on the comparison, we propose an OAuth grant type based on the power of attorney and inspired by the concept of proxy signature by warrant. Power of Attorney is a generic and self-contained document that a principal signs and directs to an agent, thereby providing it the power to execute actions on behalf of the principal for a predefined time, even if it is offline. One key advantage of the power of attorney is that it can support effective sub-granting on several levels to support industrial scenarios where resource owners bring in authorized contractors that can in their turn authorize and bring in several devices without incurring management overhead to the resource owner. A proof-of-concept and performance evaluation of the proposed model is presented using an industrial use-case scenario with multi-level authorization.

14 April 2020 in SAE International Journal of Advances and Current Practices in Mobility
Verified
Conference Paper
Closed access
SSSreelakshmi Vattaparambil Sudarsan
Sreelakshmi Vattaparambil Sudarsan
RKRajesh Koduri
Rajesh Koduri
SNSivaprasad Nandyala
Sivaprasad Nandyala
MMMithun Manalikandy
Mithun Manalikandy
The automotive industry is set for a rapid transformation in the next few years in terms of communication. The kind of growth the automotive industry is poised for in fields of connected cars is both fascinating and alarming at the same time. The communication devices equipped to the cars and the data exchanges done between vehicles to vehicles are prone to a lot of cyber-related attacks. The signals that are sent using Vehicular Adhoc Network (VANET) between vehicles can be eavesdropped by the attackers and it may be used for various attacks such as the man in the middle attack, DOS attack, Sybil attack, etc. These attacks can be prevented using the Blockchain technology, where each transaction is logged in a decentralized immutable Blockchain ledger. This provides authenticity and integrity to the signals. But the use of Blockchain Platforms such as Ethereum has various drawbacks like scalability which makes it infeasible for connected car system. Here, we propose a solution to address various drawbacks of VANET such as privacy issues and, security using a more scalable decentralized platform called IOTA incorporated with a Public Key Infrastructure.