Celeste Chevalier

Ms. Celeste Chevalier

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

6Years (2021-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
16 August 2022 in Life
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CCCeleste Chevalier
Celeste Chevalier
MWMiriam Wendner
Miriam Wendner
ASAnna Suling
Anna Suling
ECErsin Cavus
Ersin Cavus
KMKai Muellerleile
Kai Muellerleile
MPMonica Patten
Monica Patten
Serum biomarkers such as N-terminal prohormone of the brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) and cardiac troponins are elevated in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM). At present, it is not clear if these markers are associated with distinct clinical alterations in HCM, such as left ventricular hypertrophy, outflow tract obstruction, myocardial fibrosis and/or diastolic dysfunction (DD), which are associated with adverse cardiovascular outcome. Here we evaluate the association of NT-proBNP and high sensitivity cardiac troponin T (hs-cTnT) to a variety of cardiac imaging parameters in HCM patients in a multivariable regression analysis. This retrospective cross-sectional study included 366 HCM patients who underwent transthoracic echocardiography (TTE), 218 of whom also obtained cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) to assess focal myocardial fibrosis by LGE. Multivariable regression analyses revealed the strongest association of the DD parameters E/E′ mean and E/E′ septal with NT-proBNP (b = 0.06, 95%-CI [0.05–0.07], p < 0.001, R2 = 0.28; b = 0.08, 95%-CI [0.06–0.1], p < 0.001, R2 = 0.25) and LGE size showed the strongest association with hs-cTnT (b = 0.20, 95%-CI [0.15–0.24], p < 0.001, R2 = 0.28). This study indicates that NT-proBNP and hs-cTnT are associated with structural and functional alterations in HCM. NT-proBNP is a stronger predictor for DD, while hs-cTnT is associated with the extent of focal myocardial fibrosis. Both biomarkers might be useful in the diagnostic procedure in addition to imaging parameters.

Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
LKLaura Keil
Laura Keil
CCCeleste Chevalier
Celeste Chevalier
PKPaulus Kirchhof
Paulus Kirchhof
SBStefan Blankenberg
Stefan Blankenberg
GLGunnar Lund
Gunnar Lund
CMChristina Magnussen
Christina Magnussen
Non-ischemic cardiomyopathy (NICM) is one of the most important entities for arrhythmias and sudden cardiac death (SCD). Previous studies suggest a lower benefit of implantable cardioverter–defibrillator (ICD) therapy in patients with NICM as compared to ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM). Nevertheless, current guidelines do not differentiate between the two subgroups in recommending ICD implantation. Hence, risk stratification is required to determine the subgroup of patients with NICM who will likely benefit from ICD therapy. Various predictors have been proposed, among others genetic mutations, left-ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), left-ventricular end-diastolic volume (LVEDD), and T-wave alternans (TWA). In addition to these parameters, cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) has the potential to further improve risk stratification. CMR allows the comprehensive analysis of cardiac function and myocardial tissue composition. A range of CMR parameters have been associated with SCD. Applicable examples include late gadolinium enhancement (LGE), T1 relaxation times, and myocardial strain. This review evaluates the epidemiological aspects of SCD in NICM, the role of CMR for risk stratification, and resulting indications for ICD implantation.

15 December 2022 in Open Heart
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CCCeleste Chevalier
Celeste Chevalier
KKKatja Kremer
Katja Kremer
ECErsin Cavus
Ersin Cavus
JSJan Schneider
Jan Schneider
CJCharlotte Jahnke
Charlotte Jahnke
KMKai Muellerleile
Kai Muellerleile
Background: There is a paucity of data on cardiovascular magnetic resonance feature tracking (CMR-FT) in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM). We aimed at describing global and segmental myocardial strain patterns and a potential association with the presence of focal myocardial scarring in DCM patients by CMR-FT. Methods: Thirty-nine patients with DCM and reduced left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (mean 21±8%) underwent CMR including standard cine steady-state free precession (SSFP) sequences and late gadolinium enhancement (LGE). We measured global LV longitudinal as well as global and segmental circumferential and radial strain. The presence of focal myocardial fibrosis was assessed on LGE images. Results: Nineteen patients had focal myocardial fibrosis on LGE images with the highest prevalence in the basal septal segments II and III, which were affected in 12 (63%) and 13 (68%) patients. Furthermore, there was a significantly lower average short-axis LV radial strain (LVSAX-RS) in these segments (4.89 (−1.55 to 11.34) %) compared with the average of the other myocardial segments (21.20 (17.36 to 25.05)%; p<0.001) after adjusting for LGE and left-bundle branch block (LBBB). In general, LV segments with LGE had lower model-based mean LVSAX-RS values (17.65 (10.37 to 24.93) %) compared with those without LGE (19.40 (15.43 to 23.37) %), but this effect was not significant after adjusting for the presence of LBBB (p=0.630). Conclusion: Our findings revealed a coincidence of impaired radial strain and focal myocardial fibrosis in the basal septal LV myocardial segments of patients with DCM. Regardless of this pattern, we did not find a general, significant effect of myocardial fibrosis on strain in our cohort. Future studies are required to assess the potential prognostic implications of myocardial strain patterns in addition to the assessment of myocardial fibrosis in patients with DCM.