Background: Mismatch repair (MMR) system has been implicated in the response of mammalian cells to ionizing radiation and DNA damaging agents. We investigated the value of the MMR system in predicting response to adjuvant therapy in endometrial cancer.Methods: This was a single institution retrospective study. MMR protein status of endometrial carcinomas was assessed by immunohistochemistry. MMR deficient (MMR‐D) tumors were identified as MLH1 methylated or nonmethylated by methylation‐specific multiplex ligation‐dependent probe amplification. Tumors with abnormal p53 staining or polymerase ϵ exonuclease domain mutation were excluded from the MMR proficient subgroup, which was termed as “no specific molecular profile” (NSMP). Disease‐specific survival analyses were adjusted for age, stage, histology and grade, depth of myometrial invasion, and lymphovascular space invasion.Results: A total of 505 patients were included in the study. Median follow‐up time was 81 months (range 1–136). Whole pelvic radiotherapy (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 0.092 vs. no adjuvant therapy) and chemotherapy combined with radiotherapy (adjusted HR 0.18) were associated with improved disease‐specific survival in the NSMP subgroup (n = 218). In contrast, adjuvant therapies showed no effect on disease‐specific survival in the full MMR‐D cohort (n = 287) or in MLH1 methylated tumors (n = 154). Whole pelvic radiotherapy (adjusted HR 25 vs. no adjuvant therapy/vaginal brachytherapy) and chemotherapy combined with whole pelvic radiotherapy (adjusted HR 32) were associated with poor disease‐specific survival in MMR‐D nonmethylated tumors (n = 70).Conclusion: MMR protein and MLH1 methylation status predict the response to adjuvant therapy in endometrial cancer. The MMR system could be utilized for selection of patients who most likely benefit from adjuvant therapy.

The aggressiveness of mismatch repair (MMR) deficient endometrial carcinomas was examined in a single institution retrospective study. Outcomes were similar for MMR proficient (n = 508) and deficient (n = 287) carcinomas, identified by immunohistochemistry. In accordance with molecular classification based on The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA), tumors with abnormal p53 staining or polymerase-ϵ exonuclease domain mutation were excluded from the MMR proficient subgroup, termed as “no specific molecular profile” (NSMP). Compared with NSMP (n = 218), MMR deficiency (n = 191) was associated with poor disease-specific survival (p = 0.001). MMR deficiency was associated with an increased risk of cancer-related death when controlling for confounders (hazard ratio 2.0). In the absence of established clinicopathologic risk factors, MMR deficiency was invariably associated with an increased risk of cancer-related death in univariable analyses (hazard ratios ≥ 2.0). In contrast, outcomes for MMR deficient and NSMP subgroups did not differ when risk factors were present. Lymphatic dissemination was more common (p = 0.008) and the proportion of pelvic relapses was higher (p = 0.029) in the MMR deficient subgroup. Our findings emphasize the need for improved triage to adjuvant therapy and new therapeutic approaches in MMR deficient endometrial carcinomas.

Background: Clinical factors may influence endometrial cancer survival outcomes. We examined the prognostic significance of age, body mass index (BMI), and type 2 diabetes among molecular subgroups of endometrial cancer. Methods: This was a single institution retrospective study of patients who underwent surgery for endometrial carcinoma between January 2007 and December 2012. Tumors were classified into four molecular subgroups by immunohistochemistry of mismatch repair (MMR) proteins and p53, and sequencing of polymerase-ϵ (POLE). Overall, cancer-related, and non-cancer-related mortality were estimated using univariable and multivariable survival analyses. Results: Age >65 years was associated with increased mortality rates in the whole cohort (n = 515) and in the “no specific molecular profile” (NSMP) (n = 218) and MMR deficient (MMR-D) (n = 191) subgroups during a median follow-up time of 81 months (range 1‒136). However, hazard ratios for cancer-related mortality were non-significant for NSMP and MMR-D. Diabetes was associated with increased overall and non-cancer-related mortality in the whole cohort and MMR-D subgroup. Overweight/obesity had no effect on outcomes in the whole cohort, but was associated with decreased overall and cancer-related mortality in the NSMP subgroup, and increased overall and non-cancer-related mortality in the MMR-D subgroup. Overweight/obesity effect on cancer-related mortality in the NSMP subgroup remained unchanged after controlling for confounders. High-risk uterine factors were more common, and estrogen and progesterone receptor expression less common in NSMP subtype cancers of normal-weight patients compared with overweight/obese patients. No clinical factors were associated with outcomes in p53 aberrant (n = 69) and POLE mutant (n = 37) subgroups. No cancer-related deaths occurred in the POLE mutant subgroup. Conclusions: The prognostic effects of age, BMI, and type 2 diabetes do not appear to be uniform for the molecular subgroups of endometrial cancer. Our data support further evaluation of BMI combined with genomics-based risk-assessment.