Accurate functional diagnosis of coronary stenosis is vital for decision making in coronary revascularization. With recent advances in computational fluid dynamics (CFD), fractional flow reserve (FFR) can be derived non-invasively from coronary computed tomography angiography images (FFRCT) for functional measurement of stenosis. However, the accuracy of FFRCT is limited due to the approximate modeling approach of maximal hyperemia conditions. To overcome this problem, a new CFD based non-invasive method is proposed. Instead of modeling maximal hyperemia condition, a series of boundary conditions are specified and those simulated results are combined to provide a pressure-flow curve for a stenosis. Then, functional diagnosis of stenosis is assessed based on parameters derived from the obtained pressure-flow curve. The proposed method is applied to both idealized and patient-specific models, and validated with invasive FFR in six patients. Results show that additional hemodynamic information about the flow resistances of a stenosis is provided, which cannot be directly obtained from anatomy information. Parameters derived from the simulated pressure-flow curve show a linear and significant correlations with invasive FFR (r > 0.95, P < 0.05). The proposed method can assess flow resistances by the pressure-flow curve derived parameters without modeling of maximal hyperemia condition, which is a new promising approach for non-invasive functional assessment of coronary stenosis.

BACKGROUND: Pericoronary adipose tissue (PCAT) and Coronary Artery Disease Reporting and Data System (CAD-RADS) category had prognostic values for major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs). However, little is known about the difference between CAD-RADS and PCAT computed tomography (CT) attenuation for predicting MACEs. This study was to compare the prognostic value of PCAT and CAD-RADS for MACEs in patients with acute chest pain. METHODS: Between January 2010 and December 2021, all consecutive emergency patients with acute chest pain referred for coronary computed tomography angiography were enrolled in this retrospective study. MACEs included unstable angina requiring hospitalization, coronary revascularization, nonfatal myocardial infarction, and all-cause death. Patients’ clinical characteristics, CAD-RADS, and PCAT CT attenuation were used to evaluate risk factors of MACEs using multivariable Cox regression analysis. RESULTS: A total of 1313 patients were evaluated (mean age, 57.13±12.57 years; 782 men). During a median follow-up of 38 months, 142 of the 1313 patients (10.81%) experienced MACEs. Multivariable Cox regression analysis showed that CAD-RADS categories 2, 3, 4, 5 (hazard ratio range, 2.286–8.325; all P <0.005) and right coronary artery PCAT CT attenuation (hazard ratio, 1.033; P =0.006) were independent predictors of MACEs after adjusting for clinical risk factors. The C statistics revealed that CAD-RADS improved risk stratification compared with PCAT CT alone (C-index, 0.760 versus 0.712; P =0.036). However, the benefit of right coronary artery PCAT CT attenuation combined with CAD-RADS was not significant compared with CAD-RADS alone (0.777 versus 0.760; P =0.129). CONCLUSIONS: Right coronary artery PCAT CT attenuation and CAD-RADS were independent predictors of MACEs. However, no incremental prognostic value of right coronary artery PCAT CT attenuation beyond CAD-RADS was detected for MACEs in patients with acute chest pain.