Alvina Khamidullina

Dr. Alvina Khamidullina

Institute of Gene Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

11Years (2016-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
AKAlvina Khamidullina
Alvina Khamidullina
YAYaroslav E. Abramenko
Yaroslav E. Abramenko
ABAlexandra Bruter
Alexandra Bruter
VTVictor V. Tatarskiy
Victor V. Tatarskiy
Replication stress (RS) is a characteristic state of cancer cells as they tend to exchange precision of replication for fast proliferation and increased genomic instability. To overcome the consequences of improper replication control, malignant cells frequently inactivate parts of their DNA damage response (DDR) pathways (the ATM-CHK2-p53 pathway), while relying on other pathways which help to maintain replication fork stability (ATR-CHK1). This creates a dependency on the remaining DDR pathways, vulnerability to further destabilization of replication and synthetic lethality of DDR inhibitors with common oncogenic alterations such as mutations of TP53, RB1, ATM, amplifications of MYC, CCNE1 and others. The response to RS is normally limited by coordination of cell cycle, transcription and replication. Inhibition of WEE1 and PKMYT1 kinases, which prevent unscheduled mitosis entry, leads to fragility of under-replicated sites. Recent evidence also shows that inhibition of Cyclin-dependent kinases (CDKs), such as CDK4/6, CDK2, CDK8/19 and CDK12/13 can contribute to RS through disruption of DNA repair and replication control. Here, we review the main causes of RS in cancers as well as main therapeutic targets—ATR, CHK1, PARP and their inhibitors.

25 January 2023 in Investigational New Drugs
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Alexander ScherbakovAlexander Scherbakov
Alexander Scherbakov
SVSvetlana K. Vorontsova
Svetlana K. Vorontsova
AKAlvina Khamidullina
Alvina Khamidullina
MMMrdanovic Mrdanovic
Mrdanovic Mrdanovic
OAOlga Andreeva
Olga Andreeva
VSValerii Shirinian
Valerii Shirinian
The promising antitumor effects of progesterone derivatives have been identified in many studies. However, the specific mechanism of action of this class of compounds has not been fully described. Therefore, in this study, we investigated the antiproliferative and (anti)estrogenic activities of novel pentacyclic derivatives and benzylidenes of the progesterone series. The antiproliferative effects of the compounds were evaluated on hormone-dependent MCF7 breast cancer cells using the MTT test. Estrogen receptor α (ERα) activity was assessed by a luciferase-based reporter assay. Immunoblotting was used to evaluate the expression of signaling proteins. All benzylidenes demonstrated inhibitory effects with IC50 values below 10 µM, whereas pentacyclic derivatives were less active. These patterns may be associated with the lability of the geometry of benzylidene molecules, which contributes to an increase in the affinity of interaction with the receptor. The selected compounds showed significant anti-estrogenic potency. Benzylidene 1d ((8 S,9 S,10R,13 S,14 S,17 S)-17-[(2E)-3-(4-fluorophenyl)prop-2-enoyl]-10,13-dimethyl-1,2,6,7,8,9,11,12,14,15-decahydrocyclopenta[a]phenanthren-3-one) was the most active in antiproliferative and anti-estrogenic assays. Apoptosis induced by compound 1d was accompanied by decreases in CDK4, ERα, and Cyclin D1 expression. Compounds 1d and 3d were characterized by high inhibitory potency against resistant breast cancer cells. Apoptosis induced by the leader compounds was confirmed by PARP cleavage and flow cytometry analysis. Compound 3d caused cell arrest in the G2/M phase. Further analysis of novel derivatives of the progesterone series is of great importance for medicinal chemistry, drug design, and oncology. Graphical Abstract

Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
LILeonid Ilchuk
Leonid Ilchuk
NSNina Stavskaya
Nina Stavskaya
EVEkaterina Varlamova
Ekaterina Varlamova
AKAlvina Khamidullina
Alvina Khamidullina
VTVictor V. Tatarskiy
Victor V. Tatarskiy
ABAlexandra Bruter
Alexandra Bruter
Inducible Cre-dependent systems are frequently used to produce both conditional knockouts and transgenic mice with regulated expression of the gene of interest. Induction can be achieved by doxycycline-dependent transcription of the wild type gene or OH-tamoxifen-dependent nuclear translocation of the chimeric Cre/ERT2 protein. However, both of these activation strategies have some limitations. We analyzed the efficiency of knockout in different tissues and found out that it correlates with the concentration of the hydroxytamoxifen and endoxifen—the active metabolites of tamoxifen—measured by LC-MS in these tissues. We also describe two cases of Cdk8floxed/floxed/Rosa-Cre-ERT2 mice tamoxifen-induced knockout limitations. In the first case, the standard scheme of tamoxifen administration does not lead to complete knockout formation in the brain or in the uterus. Tamoxifen metabolite measurements in multiple tissues were performed and it has been shown that low recombinase activity in the brain is due to the low levels of tamoxifen active metabolites. Increase of tamoxifen dosage (1.5 fold) and duration of activation (from 5 to 7 days) allowed us to significantly improve the knockout rate in the brain, but not in the uterus. In the second case, knockout induction during embryonic development was impossible due to the negative effect of tamoxifen on gestation. Although DNA editing in the embryos was achieved in some cases, the treatment led to different complications of the pregnancy in wild-type female mice. We propose to use doxycycline-induced Cre systems in such models.

15 March 2021 in Acta Naturae
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MYM. A. Yastrebova
M. A. Yastrebova
AKAlvina Khamidullina
Alvina Khamidullina
VTVictor V. Tatarskiy
Victor V. Tatarskiy
Alexander ScherbakovAlexander Scherbakov
Alexander Scherbakov
The review analyzes Snail family proteins, which are transcription factors involved in the regulation of the epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) of tumor cells. We describe the structure of these proteins, their post-translational modification, and the mechanisms of Snail-dependent regulation of genes. The role of Snail proteins in carcinogenesis, invasion, and metastasis is analyzed. Furthermore, we focus on EMT signaling mechanisms involving Snail proteins. Next, we dissect Snail signaling in hypoxia, a condition that complicates anticancer treatment. Finally, we offer classes of chemical compounds capable of down-regulating the transcriptional activity of Snails. Given the important role of Snail proteins in cancer biology and the potential for pharmacological inhibition, Snail family proteins may be considered promising as therapeutic targets.

1 January 2022 in Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
YPYuri A. Piven
Yuri A. Piven
MYMargarita A. Yastrebova
Margarita A. Yastrebova
AKAlvina Khamidullina
Alvina Khamidullina
ASAlexander M. Scherbakov
Alexander M. Scherbakov
VTVictor V. Tatarskiy
Victor V. Tatarskiy
FLFedor A. Lakhvich
Fedor A. Lakhvich

15 February 2025 in Cell Death Discovery
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
AKAlvina Khamidullina
Alvina Khamidullina
MYMargarita A. Yastrebova
Margarita A. Yastrebova
ABAlexandra V. Bruter
Alexandra V. Bruter
JNJulia V. Nuzhina
Julia V. Nuzhina
NVNadezhda E. Vorobyeva
Nadezhda E. Vorobyeva
VTVictor V. Tatarskiy
Victor V. Tatarskiy
Imatinib mesylate (IM) and other BCR-ABL tyrosine kinase inhibitors (BCR-ABLi) are the mainstay of chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) treatment. However, activation of circumventing signaling pathways and quiescence may limit BCR-ABLi efficacy. CDK8/19 Mediator kinases have been implicated in the emergence of non-genetic drug resistance. Dissecting the effects of pharmacological CDK8/19 inhibition on CML survival in response to BCR-ABLi, we found that a selective, non-toxic CDK8/19 inhibitor (CDK8/19i) Senexin B (SenB) and other CDK8/19i sensitized K562 cells to different BCR-ABLi via attenuation of cell cycle arrest. In particular, SenB prevented IM-induced upregulation of genes that negatively regulate cell cycle progression. SenB also antagonized IM-activated p27Kip1 elevation thereby diminishing the population of G1-arrested cells. After transient G1 arrest, cells treated with IM + SenB re-entered the S phase, where they were halted and underwent replicative stress. Consequently, the combination of IM and SenB intensified apoptotic cell death, measured by activation of caspase 9 and 3, subsequent cleavage of poly(ADPriboso)polymerase 1, positive Annexin V staining and increase of subG1 fraction. In contrast, IM-treated BCR-ABL-positive KU812 CML cells, which did not induce p27Kip1, readily died regardless of SenB treatment. Thus, CDK8/19i prevent the quiescence-mediated escape from BCR-ABLi-induced apoptosis, suggesting a strategy for avoiding the CML relapse.