Objective To investigate whether stress- and mitogen-activated protein kinases (SAPK/MAPK), such as extracellular signal–regulated kinase (ERK), c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK), and p38 MAPK, are significantly activated in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) synovial tissue compared with their activation in degenerative joint disease; to assess the localization of SAPK/MAPK activation in rheumatoid synovial tissue; and to search for the factors leading to stress kinase activation in human synovial cells. Methods Immunoblotting and immunohistology by antibodies specific for the activated forms of SAPK/MAPK were performed on synovial tissue samples from patients with RA and osteoarthritis (OA). In addition, untreated and cytokine-treated human synovial cells were assessed for SAPK/MAPK activation and downstream signaling by various techniques. Results ERK, JNK, and p38 MAPK activation were almost exclusively found in synovial tissue from RA, but not OA, patients. ERK activation was localized around synovial microvessels, JNK activation was localized around and within mononuclear cell infiltrates, and p38 MAPK activation was observed in the synovial lining layer and in synovial endothelial cells. Tumor necrosis factor α, interleukin-1 (IL-1), and IL-6 were the major inducers of ERK, JNK, and p38 MAPK activation in cultured human synovial cells. Conclusion Signaling through SAPK/MAPK pathways is a typical feature of chronic synovitis in RA, but not in degenerative joint disease. SAPK/MAPK signaling is found at distinct sites in the synovial tissue, is induced by proinflammatory cytokines, and could lead to the design of highly targeted therapies.

Objective: To investigate the safety of therapeutic tumor necrosis factor α (TNFα) blockade in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), in whom this proinflammatory cytokine is significantly increased and may be involved in the disease pathogenesis.Methods: In an open‐label study, 6 patients with moderately active SLE (4 with nephritis and 3 with arthritis refractory to other therapies) were given 4 300‐mg doses of infliximab, a chimeric anti‐TNFα antibody, in addition to immunosuppression with azathioprine or methotrexate.Results: The only significant adverse events observed were urinary tract infection in 3 patients, 1 of which was accompanied by Escherichia coli bacteremia, and a prolonged febrile episode of putatively viral origin in 1 of them. These patients had similar infectious conditions in the past. In none of the patients was it necessary to terminate the treatment prematurely. Levels of antibodies to double‐stranded DNA and cardiolipin increased in 4 patients each, but this was not associated with a decrease in serum complement levels, with vascular events, or with flares. In contrast, disease activity declined during therapy. All 3 patients with joint involvement experienced remission of arthritis, which relapsed 8–11 weeks after the last infliximab infusion. In the 4 patients with lupus nephritis, proteinuria decreased significantly within 1 week after initiation of therapy and was diminished by ≥60% within 8 weeks, remaining at low levels until the end of the observation period (at least several months).Conclusion: Infliximab did not lead to adverse events related to an increase in SLE activity, although autoantibodies to double‐stranded DNA and cardiolipin increased, as expected. This finding, coupled with the clinical improvement in the inflammatory manifestations of the disease, indicates that further study in larger controlled trials is warranted.

Background: Early treatment prevents progression of joint damage in rheumatoid arthritis (RA), but diagnosis in early disease is impeded by lack of appropriate diagnostic criteria. Objective: To study the value of rheumatoid factor (RF), anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide autoantibodies (anti-CCP), and anti-RA33 autoantibodies for diagnosis of RA and prediction of outcome in patients with very early arthritis. Methods: The prospective follow up inception cohort included 200 patients with very early (<3 months) inflammatory joint disease. Autoantibodies were measured at baseline and analysed in a tree based model which aimed at determining the added diagnostic value of testing for anti-CCP and anti-RA33 as compared with RF alone. Results: RA was diagnosed in 102 patients, while 98 developed other inflammatory arthropathies. Receiver operator curve analysis showed an optimum cut off level for RF at 50 U/ml, above which anti-CCP and anti-RA33 had no additional diagnostic value. Remarkably, RF ⩾50 U/ml and anti-CCP showed similar sensitivity and high specificity for RA, but overlapped considerably. Anti-RA33 was less specific and did not correlate with RF or anti-CCP. Among patients with RA, 72% showed at least one of these three autoantibodies, compared with 15% of non-RA patients. RF ⩾50 U/ml and anti-CCP were predictors of erosive disease, whereas anti-RA33 was associated with mild disease. Conclusions: Stepwise autoantibody testing in early inflammatory joint disease, starting with RF, followed by anti-CCP (in patients with RF <50 U/ml), and finally anti-RA33, should be used as a sensitive and effective strategy for distinguishing patients with RA at high risk for poor outcome.

An inception cohort of 238 patients having peripheral joint synovitis of less than 12 months duration was evaluated clinically and followed prospectively for 1 year to determine the clinical significance of a number of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) associated autoantibodies. Serum samples collected at the time of the initial evaluation were tested for rheumatoid factor (RF) and antibodies to Sa (anti-Sa), RA-33, (pro)filaggrin [antifilaggrin antibody (AFA)], cyclic citrullinated peptide (anti-CCP), calpastatin, and keratin [antikeratin antibody (AKA)]. RF had a sensitivity of 66% and a specificity of 87% for RA. Anti-Sa, AFA, and anti-CCP all had a specificity of more than 90%, but a sensitivity of less than 50% for this diagnosis. Overall, there was a high degree of correlation between AFA, AKA, anti-Sa or anti-CCP, this being highest between anti-Sa and anti-CCP (odds ratio, 13.3; P < 0.001). Of the 101 patients who were positive for at least one of these four autoantibodies, 57% were positive for only one. Finally, anti-SA identified a subset of predominantly male RA patients with severe, erosive disease. Anti-SA, AFA and anti-CCP are all specific for early RA but, overall, have little additional diagnostic value over RF alone. Although these antibodies may preferentially recognize citrullinated antigens, the modest degree of concordance between them in individual patient sera suggests that it is unlikely a single antigen is involved in generating these responses.

Objective: To investigate the efficacy of single and combined blockade of tumor necrosis factor (TNF), interleukin‐1 (IL‐1), and RANKL pathways on synovial inflammation, bone erosion, and cartilage destruction in a TNF‐driven arthritis model.Methods: Human TNF–transgenic (hTNFtg) mice were treated with anti‐TNF (infliximab), IL‐1 receptor antagonist (IL‐1Ra; anakinra), or osteoprotegerin (OPG; an OPG‐Fc fusion protein), either alone or in combinations of 2 agents or all 3 agents. Synovial inflammation, bone erosion, and cartilage damage were evaluated histologically.Results: Synovial inflammation was inhibited by anti‐TNF (−51%), but not by IL‐1Ra or OPG monotherapy. The combination of anti‐TNF with either IL‐1Ra (−91%) or OPG (−81%) was additive and almost completely blocked inflammation. Bone erosion was effectively blocked by anti‐TNF (−79%) and OPG (−60%), but not by IL‐1Ra monotherapy. The combination of anti‐TNF with IL‐1Ra, however, completely blocked bone erosion (−98%). Inhibition of bone erosion was accompanied by a reduction of osteoclast numbers in synovial tissue. Cartilage destruction was inhibited by anti‐TNF (−43%) and was weakly, but not significantly, inhibited by IL‐1Ra, but was not inhibited by OPG monotherapy. The combination of anti‐TNF with IL‐1Ra was the most effective double combination therapy in preventing cartilage destruction (−80%). In all analyses, the triple combination of anti‐TNF, IL‐1Ra, and OPG was not superior to the double combination of anti‐TNF and IL‐1Ra.Conclusion: Articular changes caused by chronic overexpression of TNF are not completely blockable by monotherapies that target TNF, IL‐1, or RANKL. However, combined approaches, especially the combined blockade of TNF and IL‐1 and, to a lesser extent, TNF and RANKL, lead to almost complete remission of disease. Differences in abilities to block synovial inflammation, bone erosion, and cartilage destruction further strengthen the rationale for using combined blockade of more than one proinflammatory pathway.