Hemang B. Panchal

Dr. Hemang B. Panchal

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

18Years (2009-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 December 2014 in The American Journal of Cardiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
HPHemang B. Panchal
Hemang B. Panchal
VLVatsal Ladia
Vatsal Ladia
PAParthiv Amin
Parthiv Amin
PPParthavkumar Patel
Parthavkumar Patel
SVSreenivas P Veeranki
Sreenivas P Veeranki
TPTimir Paul
Timir Paul

1 December 2017 in Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
TPTimir K. Paul
Timir K. Paul
SBSamit Bhatheja
Samit Bhatheja
HPHemang B. Panchal
Hemang B. Panchal
SZShimin Zheng
Shimin Zheng
SBSubhash Banerjee
Subhash Banerjee
DMDebabrata Mukherjee
Debabrata Mukherjee
Background—: Current guidelines give a class I recommendation to use of embolic protection devices (EPD) for saphenous vein graft (SVG) intervention; however, studies have shown conflicting results. The objective of this meta-analysis is to compare all-cause mortality, major adverse cardiovascular events, myocardial infarction (MI), or target vessel revascularization in SVG intervention with and without EPD. Methods and Results—: Literature was searched through October 2016. Eight studies (n=52 893) comparing SVG intervention performed with EPD (n=11 506) and without EPD (n=41 387) were included. There was no significant difference in all-cause mortality (odds ratio [OR], 0.79; confidence interval [CI], 0.55–1.12; P =0.19), major adverse cardiovascular events (OR, 0.73, CI, 0.51–1.05; P =0.09), target vessel revascularization (OR, 1.0; CI, 0.95–1.05; P =0.94), periprocedural MI (OR, 1.12; CI, 0.65–1.90, P =0.69), and late MI (OR, 0.80; CI, 0.52–1.23; P =0.30) between the 2 groups. Sensitivity analysis excluding CathPCI Registry study showed no difference in periprocedural MI, late MI, and target vessel revascularization; however, it favored EPD use in all-cause mortality and major adverse cardiovascular events. Further sensitivity analysis including only observational studies revealed no difference in all-cause mortality, major adverse cardiovascular events, target vessel revascularization, and late MI. Additional analysis after excluding CathPCI Registry study revealed no difference in outcomes. Conclusions—: This study including 52 893 patients suggests no apparent benefit in routine use of EPD during SVG intervention in the contemporary real-world practice. Further randomized clinical trials are needed in current era to evaluate long-term outcomes in routine use of EPD, and meanwhile, current guideline recommendations on EPD use should be revisited.

1 September 2013 in The American Journal of Cardiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
HPHemang B. Panchal
Hemang B. Panchal
VLVatsal Ladia
Vatsal Ladia
SDSaurabh Desai
Saurabh Desai
TSTejaskumar Shah
Tejaskumar Shah
VRVijay Ramu
Vijay Ramu

1 July 2016 in Preventive Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Hadii MamuduHadii Mamudu
Hadii Mamudu
TPTimir K. Paul
Timir K. Paul
Liang WangLiang Wang
Liang Wang
SVSreenivas P Veeranki
Sreenivas P Veeranki
HPHemang B. Panchal
Hemang B. Panchal
Matthew Jay BudoffMatthew Jay Budoff
Matthew Jay Budoff

10 June 2016 in The American Journal of the Medical Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
SBSamit Bhatheja
Samit Bhatheja
HPHemang B. Panchal
Hemang B. Panchal
HVHector Ventura
Hector Ventura
TPTimir K. Paul
Timir K. Paul

1 February 2017 in Southern Medical Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
HMHadii M. Mamudu
Hadii M. Mamudu
TPTimir K. Paul
Timir K. Paul
Liang WangLiang Wang
Liang Wang
SVSreenivas P. Veeranki
Sreenivas P. Veeranki
HPHemang B. Panchal
Hemang B. Panchal
MBMatthew Budoff
Matthew Budoff
Objectives: The central Appalachian region of the United States is disproportionately burdened with cardiovascular diseases (CVD) and associated risk factors; however, research to inform clinical practice and policies and programs is sparse. This study aimed to examine the association between multiple modifiable risk factors for CVD and hypertension in asymptomatic patients in central...