Mohammad Khalilzadeh

Prof. Dr. Mohammad Khalilzadeh

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

10Years (2017-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
19 February 2021 in Advances in Human-Computer Interaction
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
FRForouzan Rezaei
Forouzan Rezaei
Mohammad KhalilzadehMohammad Khalilzadeh
Mohammad Khalilzadeh
PSParia Soleimani
Paria Soleimani
This study aims to investigate and identify the factors affecting the empowerment and implementation of knowledge management in organizations as well as the impact of knowledge management on organizational performance. This study also examines the mediating role of human capital in the relationship between knowledge management and performance of Kabul Steel Plant, which is the largest steel plant in Afghanistan. The research model was developed through the literature review. The initial data were collected through a questionnaire containing 48 questions. Participants were 108 managers and administrative staff of the company. The collected data were analyzed by using the SPSS and SmartPLS software. The hypotheses regarding the impact of strategy and technology on knowledge management were rejected by using correlation analysis and t-test statistic. Finally, the findings showed the positive effects of variables of structure, culture, leadership, and trust on knowledge management in an organization. Also, knowledge management influences the organizational performance, both directly and through the mediating variable of human capital. This research encourages the managers and employees of organizations to use the available organizational resources to implement knowledge management in organizations and improve knowledge management practices and human resources that are the most valuable resources of any organization in order to remain competitive in the markets.

1 August 2020 in Heliyon
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
HSHedieh Shakeri
Hedieh Shakeri
Mohammad KhalilzadehMohammad Khalilzadeh
Mohammad Khalilzadeh
One of the main factors in the success of projects is communications management and proper and timely distribution of information among all internal and external project stakeholders. Despite of emphasizing on the importance of project communications in the literature, there are few studies identifying factors influencing project communications. This research aims to address this shortcoming by identifying and determining sequences and relationships factors affecting project communications and their clustering. The informed communication strategy allows managers to structure the information flow in a better and more controlled manner and to avoid the costs caused by lack of effective and timely communication. The present study is conducted to help clarify the views of the organization's managers and project managers on project communications, and to identify factors affecting it and how they effectively communicate to successfully accomplish the projects. First a number of factors influencing project communications are identified on the basis of previous studies and interviews with experts and project managers working in oil, gas and power plant construction megaprojects in Iran. Then, these factors are analyzed by using the combination of fuzzy DEMATEL and Interpretive Structural Modeling (ISM) techniques. The relationships and sequence between the indicators are determined so that it can be effective in project communications planning and project success through providing an insight for senior managers and project managers.

25 July 2020 in International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Sayyid Ali BanihashemiSayyid Ali Banihashemi
Sayyid Ali Banihashemi
Mohammad KhalilzadehMohammad Khalilzadeh
Mohammad Khalilzadeh
ASA. Shahraki
A. Shahraki
MMM. Rostami Malkhalifeh
M. Rostami Malkhalifeh
SAS. S. R. Ahmadizadeh
S. S. R. Ahmadizadeh

2 June 2022 in Environment, Development and Sustainability
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Ali HeidariAli Heidari
Ali Heidari
DIDin Mohammad Imani
Din Mohammad Imani
Mohammad KhalilzadehMohammad Khalilzadeh
Mohammad Khalilzadeh
MSMahdieh Sarbazvatan
Mahdieh Sarbazvatan

30 September 2021 in Sustainability
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Sayyid Ali BanihashemiSayyid Ali Banihashemi
Sayyid Ali Banihashemi
Mohammad KhalilzadehMohammad Khalilzadeh
Mohammad Khalilzadeh
Edmundas Kazimieras ZavadskasEdmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas
Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas
Jurgita AntuchevicieneJurgita Antucheviciene
Jurgita Antucheviciene
Currently, construction projects have a significant share in environmental pollution. Usually, the employers and managers of construction projects pay attention to the project implementation with the shortest duration and the lowest cost, whereas less attention is paid to the environmental effects of the implementation of projects. Sustainable development requires the planning and implementation of construction projects, taking environmental impacts, along with other factors, into account. Few studies have investigated the balancing time, cost, and environmental effects. Although the selection of an execution method for the project activity requires the use of decision-making methods, these methods have not been used in the project scheduling problems. This study seeks to simultaneously minimize the project time, cost, and environmental impacts. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the environmental impact of project activities in three physical, biological, and social aspects throughout the construction projects, and to attempt to minimize them as measurable values. In this paper, the environmental effects of an urban water supply construction project as a real case study are assessed in different activity execution modes by the Leopold matrix and the best execution mode of each project activity is selected using the CoCoSo (combined compromise solution) multi-criteria decision-making method, considering the time–cost-environmental impact trade-off. The CoCoSo method is employed because of its high flexibility compared to other multi-criteria decision-making methods. The results of this study will direct managers and stakeholders of construction projects to pay more attention to the environmental effects of construction project activities, together with the other conventional project goals and objectives, such as the time and cost.

6 June 2020 in Journal of Enterprise Information Management
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
RFReza Fattahi
Reza Fattahi
RTReza Tavakkoli-Moghaddam
Reza Tavakkoli-Moghaddam
Mohammad KhalilzadehMohammad Khalilzadeh
Mohammad Khalilzadeh
NSNasser Shahsavari-Pour
Nasser Shahsavari-Pour
RSRoya Soltani
Roya Soltani
Purpose: Risk assessment is a very important step toward managing risks in various organizations and industries. One of the most extensively applied risk assessment techniques is failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA). In this paper, a novel fuzzy multiple-criteria decision-making (MCDM)-based FMEA model is proposed for assessing the risks of different failure modes more accurately.Design/methodology/approach: In this model, the weight of each failure mode is considered instead of risk priority number (RPN). Additionally, three criteria of time, cost and profit are added to the three previous risk factors of occurrence (O), severity (S) and detection (D). Furthermore, the weights of the mentioned criteria and the priority weights of the decision-makers calculated by modified fuzzy AHP and fuzzy weighted MULTIMOORA methods, respectively, are considered in the proposed model. A new ranking method of fuzzy numbers is also utilized in both proposed fuzzy MCDM methods.Findings: To show the capability and usefulness of the suggested fuzzy MCDM-based FMEA model, Kerman Steel Industries Factory is considered as a case study. Moreover, a sensitivity analysis is conducted for validating the achieved results. Findings indicate that the proposed model is a beneficial and applicable tool for risk assessment.Originality/value: To the best of authors’ knowledge, no research has considered the weights of failure modes, the weights of risk factors and the priority weights of decision-makers simultaneously in the FMEA method.