Till Utesch

Prof. Dr. Till Utesch

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

12Years (2015-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
11 February 2019 in Sports Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
TUTill Utesch
Till Utesch
Farid BardidFarid Bardid
Farid Bardid
DBDirk Büsch
Dirk Büsch
BSBernd Strauss
Bernd Strauss

1 August 2019 in Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
DWDaizong Wen
Daizong Wen
TUTill Utesch
Till Utesch
JWJun Wu
Jun Wu
SRSamuel Robertson
Samuel Robertson
JLJohn Liu
John Liu
CHChen Haichun
Chen Haichun

Luis LopesLuis Lopes
Luis Lopes
Rute SantosRute Santos
Rute Santos
MCManuel J Coelho-e-Silva
Manuel J Coelho-e-Silva
CDCatherine Draper
Catherine Draper
JMJorge Mota
Jorge Mota
CACésar Agostinis-Sobrinho
César Agostinis-Sobrinho
Lack of physical activity is a global public health problem causing not only morbidity and premature mortality, but it is also a major economic burden worldwide. One of the cornerstones of a physically active lifestyle is Motor Competence (MC). MC is a complex biocultural attribute and therefore, its study requires a multi-sectoral, multi-, inter- and transdisciplinary approach. MC is a growing area of research, especially in children and adolescents due to its positive association with a plethora of health and developmental outcomes. Many questions, however, remain to be answered in this field of research, with regard to: (i) Health and Developmental-related Associations of MC; (ii) Assessment of MC; (iii) Prevalence and Trends of MC; (iv) Correlates and Determinants of MC; (v) MC Interventions, and (vi) Translating MC Research into Practice and Policy. This paper presents a narrative review of the literature, summarizing current knowledge, identifying key research gaps and presenting questions for future investigation on MC in children and adolescents. This is a collaborative effort from the International Motor Competence Network (IMCNetwork) a network of academics and researchers aiming to promote international collaborative research and knowledge translation in the expansive field of MC. The knowledge and deliverables generated by addressing and answering the aforementioned research questions on MC presented in this review have the potential to shape the ways in which researchers and practitioners promote MC and physical activity in children and adolescents across the world.

12 April 2018 in Scientific Reports
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
TUTill Utesch
Till Utesch
DDD. Dreiskämper
D. Dreiskämper
RNR. Naul
R. Naul
KGK. Geukes
K. Geukes
Both the physical self-concept and actual motor competence are important for healthy future physical activity levels and consequently decrease overweight and obesity in childhood. However, children scoring high on motor competence do not necessarily report high levels of physical self-concept and vice versa, resulting in respective (in-) accuracy also referred to as (non-) veridicality. This study examines whether children’s accuracy of physical self-concept is a meaningful predictive factor for their future physical activity. Motor competence, physical self-concept and physical activity were assessed in 3rd grade and one year later in 4th grade. Children’s weight status was categorized based on WHO recommendations. Polynomial regression with Response surface analyses were conducted with a quasi-DIF approach examining moderating weight status effects. Analyses revealed that children with higher motor competence levels and higher self-perceptions show greater physical activity. Importantly, children who perceive their motor competence more accurately (compared to less) show more future physical activity. This effect is strong for underweight and overweight/obese children, but weak for normal weight children. This study indicates that an accurate self-perception of motor competence fosters future physical activity beyond single main effects, respectively. Hence, the promotion of actual motor competence should be linked with the respective development of accurate self-knowledge.

26 April 2017 in Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
TUTill Utesch
Till Utesch
DDDennis Dreiskämper
Dennis Dreiskämper
BSBernd Strauss
Bernd Strauss
RNRoland Naul
Roland Naul

15 January 2021 in Children
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MCMatteo Crotti
Matteo Crotti
JRjames rudd
james rudd
SRSimon Roberts
Simon Roberts
Lynne M. BoddyLynne M. Boddy
Lynne M. Boddy
KDKatie Fitton Davies
Katie Fitton Davies
LFLawrence Foweather
Lawrence Foweather
Background: School-based interventions are a key opportunity to improve children’s physical activity (PA); however, there is lack of evidence about how pedagogical approaches to motor learning in physical education (PE) might affect PA in children. Therefore, this study aimed to assess how different pedagogical approaches in PE might affect children’s PA. Methods: Participants (n = 360, 5–6 years) from 12 primary schools within the SAMPLE-PE randomized controlled trial were randomly allocated to either Linear Pedagogy (LP: n = 3) or Nonlinear Pedagogy (NP: n = 3) interventions, where schools received a 15-week PE intervention delivered by trained coaches, or to a control group (n = 6), where schools followed usual practice. ActiGraph GT9X accelerometers were used to assess PA metrics (moderate-to-vigorous PA, mean raw acceleration and lowest acceleration over the most active hour and half hour) over whole and segmented weeks at baseline, immediately post-intervention and 6 months follow-up. Intention to treat analysis employing multilevel modelling was used to assess intervention effects. Results: LP and NP interventions did not significantly affect children’s PA levels compared to the control group. Conclusion: PE interventions based on LP and NP alone might not be effective in improving habitual PA in children.